User talk:Sunnybondsinghjalwehra
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] 
Welcome, Sunnybondsinghjalwehra!
Hello, Sunnybondsinghjalwehra, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Clamster5, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
{{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!thanks thanksSunnybondsinghjalwehra 12:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Copyrighted text
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Asa Nu Maan Watna Da article, but for legal reasons, we CANNOT accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material.
As a consequence, your article will most likely be deleted; in fact, it may already have been deleted.
Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text - which means allowing other people to modify it - then you have to prove that it's yours (because people can and do lie) by adding, on the external site, the statement that "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I irrevocably release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. - Lucky 6.9 17:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
oh ok
thanks man
Sunnybondsinghjalwehra 17:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] welcome to Wikiproject India
Hi, and welcome to the India WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
- The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every India article in Wikipedia.
- Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! -- Lost(talk) 10:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
HEYYY thanksSunnybondsinghjalwehra 12:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stub creation
Hi there, and welcome! I see that you're active in the India WikiProjects. May I suggest that before you create a "stub" category, you propose it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals before plunging in? The Cat:Indian Punjabi-language films-stub has some problems, in that there aren't really enough articles to justify a stub type (usually at least 60 articles should qualify), plus there are naming conventions to be applied. I don't want to discourage you, so please have a look at the proposals page and use it if you want stub types created. Cheers! Pegship 00:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 
WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume 1, Issue 2 - November 2006
|
|
|
i read all this, thx for calling me a contributious editer... Sunnybondsinghjalwehra 16:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume I, Issue 3 - December 2006
|
|
|
[edit] Article for Deletion
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sikhs_in_Belgium, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikhs_in_Belgium. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Qwertyca 02:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Removed
User:CanadianCaesar has extensively re-written your article on Sikhs_in_Belgium and brought it up to par for a Wikipedia stub. As a result, I will request an admin to remove it from AfD. Thanks. --Qwertyca 05:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume II, Issue 1 - January 2007
|
|
|
[edit] Romiz Uddan
[edit] Romuz Uddin
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Romuz Uddin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Joe Decker 23:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume II, Issue 2 - March 2007
|
|
|
[edit] License tagging for Image:Sant.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sant.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Jalwehrain1987.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jalwehrain1987.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jalwehrain87.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jalwehrain87.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jalwehrareceivingsiropa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jalwehrareceivingsiropa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:0EB4EE75.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:0EB4EE75.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Seraphim Whipp 13:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shaheed Manjeet Singh Babbar
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Shaheed Manjeet Singh Babbar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 17:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GurdasMithiRamainKachehari.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GurdasMithiRamainKachehari.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:ActorShivendraMahal.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ActorShivendraMahal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 13:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:GurdasMithiRamainKachehari.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GurdasMithiRamainKachehari.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Koom Singh Doad
A tag has been placed on Koom Singh Doad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ChrisDHDR 21:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sukhdev Ahluwalia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sukhdev Ahluwalia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.cfsindia.org/colors/26.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Non-commercial image
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Carlosguitar (ready and willing) 21:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Jagjit singh chauhan.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jagjit singh chauhan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Gurmit singh aulakh.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gurmit singh aulakh.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 22:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of President of Khalistan
An article that you have been involved in editing, President of Khalistan, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/President of Khalistan. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] bolowali encounter
Sir, could u please explain me why u put an notice on the article Bolowali Encounter? COuld u tell me what I can do, to improve it. Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 14:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, the article on Bolowali Encounter does not have any verifiable reference and on googling it one gets only 3 hits out of which two are from wikipedia and the other is an extremist pov blog, thus it seems that the article is based on original research WP:OR. I would like to suggest that in order to keep the article you have to get verifiable npov sources to substantiate the claims made in the article. LegalEagle (talk) 14:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Proposed Map of Khalistan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Proposed Map of Khalistan.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] hi
Hi how are you 123.201.45.80 (talk) 08:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
hi i'm fine how ru? ur sikh?? Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Moujiya Encounter: BKI against Indian Armed Forces
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LegalEagle (talk) 11:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Mistake in categorising as attack, I was using TW and instead of Original research i had inadvertently opted for attack, however if you look into the article you would find that the attack tag has been replaced with other tag. LegalEagle (talk) 12:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi Sunny
God bless U, If you can read/ translate or know Hindi & ..... if you are helpful .....or say... If you are familiar with some cities states of India, I need your help. That will be great if your good self will guide me about some newspapers , their authenticity , circulation , reading status, popularity etc in your North Indian states like: Jammu Kashmir , Punjab , Rajasthan , Uttar Pradesh , Haryana etc. I want to now about newspapers like - Punjab Kesari , (Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh ) Dainik Bhaskar ( Rajasthan , Gujarat etc) Rajasthan Patrika, Evening Post (Jaipur}, Samachar Jagat(Udaipur), Aparan Times (Udaipur), Mahka Bharat (Jaipur) , Nav jyoti (Jaipur) If you can help me out please come on my talk page .--Dralansun (talk) 10:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Regards - Alan Sun
[edit] Khalistan movement
Hi, I have been paying attention to your edits on the article and I actually think that you have been doing a good job. My intent was to remove the weasel words and POV inserted by an anonymous IP (not you). I would appreciate it, however, if you didn't call my edits POV because of me being a Hindu. Thanks! --vi5in[talk] 17:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Sunny, the khalistan and Sikh movement articles are again being vandalised with extreme Indian POV, suggeste you and other Wiki editors push for protection
Can the Khalistan pages be protected they are vandalised everyday , also other Sikh pages seem to be under attack.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 07:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Brother Sunny, the Khalistan related pages are mostly attacked, if you click on the IP address of the Indian extremists the changes come up. Eeven the 'Sikh' page was up until recently had a focus towards showing a lot of Sikhs with cut hair, subtle but you know what is going on. Can the Khalistan pages be protected, a file sent to higher administrators about what is going on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 07:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Gurmit Singh Aulakhs page is also attacked, you can get a trial of all the changes when you click on their IP address. Are there a group of Sikh editors, the Indian ones all oppose Sikh views mostly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 10:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Indo-Khalistan wars
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Indo-Khalistan wars, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Sunny, the khalistan and Sikh movement articles are again being vandalised with extreme Indian POV, suggeste you and other Wiki editors push for protection —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 07:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you file a 3RR report against some of the people making changes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 09:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Shere Punjab
The article Shere Punjab has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. See WP:V -- you need sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sukhdev Singh Jalwerha
Hi there. I've nominated the above article for deletion. Since you created it, your opinions and input into the discussion are welcome. You can chime in here. I would suggest that you bring sources and other ways to back up the claims of notability in the article, if you can the chances of a keep are much higher. Thanks! --UsaSatsui (talk) 17:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:JagtarSinghHawara.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JagtarSinghHawara.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Paramjit Singh Ajrawat
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paramjit Singh Ajrawat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Paramjit Singh Ajrawat. LegalEagle (talk) 16:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Gotras of Rajputs
A tag has been placed on Template:Gotras of Rajputs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hello Sunny! Bond?
I have removed the war tag of Khalistan Indo wars from Operation Blue Star. As you might not know that Bhindranwale was fighting for greater rights for Punjab. He is known for raising voice for his religion and Khalistan does not seem to be expicitly in his agenda. It is a very comlicated matter ( i mean his views on Khalistan ). Operation blue Star has nothing to do with Khalistan ( Trust Me ). If you wan to discuus or reply, do it here.Ajjay (talk) 17:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- You are right. But he meant that the attack on Golden Temple would convince the sikhs that there is no use of living in a country which wants to destroy them. The concept of Khalistan would come if Sikhs had no place in India. Before operation blue star, he was not an explicit demanding Khalistan, he was raising his voice for other reasons, such as greater freedom etc.Ajjay (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mehnga Singh Babbar
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mehnga Singh Babbar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mehnga Singh Babbar. LegalEagle (talk) 12:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiquette alerts
Hello, you have been reported to the wikiquette noticeboard for what seems to be a serious breach of civility rules. Considering all the circumstances of the case that I can see, I would say that that was probably the correct place (rather than WP:ANI where they easily block users). While leaving a message on another user's user page, starting with "u idiot", is of course never OK, I am aware that the translation of the rest of your comment may have been an April fools' joke. In any case I would appreciate your comment at WP:WQA#Sunnybondsinghjalwehra. --Hans Adler (talk) 14:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sukhdev Singh Babbar
Please save article Sukhdev Singh Babbar from deletion by voting at Vote if you beleive that he was a notable person. Singh6 (talk) 15:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Navneet Singh Khadian
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Navneet Singh Khadian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? UtherSRG (talk) 11:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Extremely Urgent - IHRO
Please give your vote at Wikipedia:RSN#ihro.in if you beleive that Human Rights Watchdog is a unbiased organization.
Please remember that huge number of crimes committed by Indian security forces in Punjab will go un-referenced on wikipedia if www.ihro.in is declared POV site. Reason this is among extremely few unbiased sources available online. Eventhough some of the north-Indian newspapers always published govt crimes in Punjab, but unfortunately they do not have this old data archived. For example, The Tribune (a 125 year old newspaper group), one of north-Indian newspapers does not have any online editions prior to year 2001 and Ajit, a regional newspaper of India etc did not have any online editions untill very recently. Also, India’s National magazine, Frontline does not have archive records prior to 1997.
Please read "Amnesty International", "Amnesty International, "Human Rights watch" where it says that "Thousands of mothers await their sons even though some may know that that the oppressor has not spared their sons’ lives on this earth. A mother’s heart is such that even if she sees her son’s dead body, she does not accept that her son has left her. And those mothers who have not even seen their children’s dead bodies, they were asking us: at least find out, is our son alive or not?" and "ENSAAF". As per HRW, Indian security forces arbitrarily detained, tortured, executed, and “disappeared” tens of thousands of Sikhs in counterinsurgency operations. Please remember, Amnesty International was not allowed to enter Punjab during these troubled times, hence Amnesty can not provide records of most of the crimes committed by Indian security forces as an India based Organization IHRO.
So please vote at Wikipedia:RSN#ihro.in ASAP .Singh6 (talk) 07:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Navneet Singh Khadian
An article that you have been involved in editing, Navneet Singh Khadian, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navneet Singh Khadian. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? UtherSRG (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
