User talk:Ineffable3000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Welcome! 2 Orange County Department on Aging 3 Fire of Moscow 4 My RFA 5 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Clements University 5.1 what do u make of this 6 Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy 7 Revert 8 Welcome! 9 Vandalism on ted drewes page 10 Rosario Ybarra 11 Nishkid64's RfA thanks 12 AFD 13 Featured picture promotion! 14 Peter Yavanov 15 Rosario Ybarra 16 Battle of the Durham Station 17 Invitation 18 Image copyright problem with Image:Kuzbass_workers.jpg 19 {{Wdefcon}} 20 Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3 21 Spyware Stormer 22 Revert vandalism 23 Benjamin Erfe 24 Image tagging for Image:Eralash2.jpg 25 Wikipedia:Esotericism does not imply non-notability 26 Deletion 27 Hey Ineffable, 28 Reed Bed panorama 29 Request for edit summary 30 Did you know? 31 Battle of Grozny (August 1996) 32 Closure of Siberian Wikipedia 33 Congrats 34 Image copyright problem with Image:M_dol_dob.jpg 35 stamps copyrighted 36 Page moves 37 Welcome to the Military history WikiProject! 38 Battle of Amstetten 39 Re: Battle of Amstetten 40 Open City 41 Lists of (insert characteristic) people 42 George Vernadsky 43 ЯрГУ 44 Your comment 45 reinstatement of Jawbone under discussion 46 Allow me 47 Writing about math 48 Mainpage criticizing 49 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006 50 Confused 51 Re: Anglo-Spanish War (1800s) 52 DYK! 53 Image:La guerra grande.jpg 54 Sokha 55 Russian loanword 56 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007 57 WP:NPOV shortcut 58 WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections 59 WikiProject Military History elections 60 Brahman cattle.JPG 61 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007 62 Costa Rica Hydroelectric plant 63 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007 64 April Fools Day 65 Why did you delete my page 66 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007) 67 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007) 68 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007) 69 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lost scrapbook.jpg 70 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Opencity-cover.jpg 71 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lots.jpg 72 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rules of procedure.jpg

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Ineffable3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! --Ghirla ^-трёп- 09:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orange County Department on Aging

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Orange County Department on Aging article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Melchoir 23:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I have rephrased the article. Thanks for the hint. --Ineffable3000 23:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay, good hunting! Melchoir 23:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fire of Moscow

I'm sure the image is free. You may upload it under {{PD-art}} license. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 11:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA

Thank you, Ineffable3000, for voting on my RFA, which passed 95 to 1. Now that I have the mop, I hope I can live up to the standard, and be a good administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. —this is messedrocker (talk) 21:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Clements University

Hi. I see you've weighed in on this AfD. I just noticed that TheronJ has substantially cleaned up the article, and I think St. Clements University is worth another look. Regards, William Pietri 06:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] what do u make of this

Ryodox [1] 66.246.72.108 13:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

That was not my doing. Someone else had gotten ahold of my account over a year ago and used it to vandalize that page. I have since changed my password.

--Ryodox 18:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy

Hi. You contributed to the discussion at Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy. If you have the time and interest, I'm asking contributors to past a brief summary of their position on the proposal here, thanks. Herostratus 20:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Revert

I notice that you reverted my last edit to the ejaculation article, but I fail to see why, since the bulk of my edit was updating to the new reference style, noting an unreferenced statement, and clarifying a poorly-written section. --HarmonicFeather 08:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

[edit] Vandalism on ted drewes page

Yes, I did vandalize the ted drewes page after it was shamelessly returned to its inaccurate state. Yes, the christmas trees suck. Yes, there are rednecks yelling at each other all the time. Whoever is in charge of the wiki page is either an employee who wants to paint a false picture of what it is like or has never been there. I will continue to edit the page until the lies about ted drewes being a quality establishment are washed away forever. Congrats on being a pathetic nerd with nothing better to do than stop online vandalism of one of the least credible sources for information in the history of the internet. Hey, I think your mom is calling you from up the stairs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.217.129.175 (talk • contribs)

Expressing your point of view and conducting original research is strictly forbidden on Wikipedia pages. Read WP:POV and WP:OR. Please refrain from vandalism and personal attacks in the future. --Ineffable3000 00:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Ha, that is laughable. That page is nothing more than an advertisement to start with. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.217.129.175 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Rosario Ybarra

Hello ineffable3000!

The name of Senator Rosario Ybarra is with an "Y" (Ybarra) not with "I" (Ibarra). Most people write Ybarra's name in the wrong way. [2]

Regards,

Abögarp 18:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nishkid64's RfA thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RfA, which closed successfully earlier today with a result of (60/9/4). Although, I encountered a few problems in my RfA, I have peacefully resolved my conflicts and made amends with the people involved. If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free talk to me. I hope I will live up to your expectations. --Nishkid64 22:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AFD

No need to move AFDs from one day to the next - they should stay in the log of the day they were opened. Also, please add new nominations at the bottom of the list, otherwise they will get missed by people who just check the latest additions. Cheers, Yomangani^talk 01:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Featured picture promotion!

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Crab Nebula.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. howcheng {chat} 18:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

This is to let you know the Featured Picture you uploaded and/or nominated Image:Crab Nebula.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the day on December 25, 2006, when it will be featured on the Main Page. Congratulations! howcheng {chat} 17:28, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Yavanov

Thank you for your message. As you might have guessed, I did not close the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Yavanov. What you saw was a forgery by Infrogtation (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) which I have just reverted. I have reported this at WP:ANI and I hope that Infrogtation will be blocked. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rosario Ybarra

Hello ineffable3000

I left a message to Abogarp, because I sent a mail to Rosario´s office to know from her mouth which is her real surname. Since you are from counter vandalism unit I want to make clear there was not such thing from me.

What I rejact it´s the censorship. The "Liga 23 de Septiembre" was an armed organization, not just a "communist organization", and killed soldiers and policemen, but also innocent civilian people.

Posmodern2000

[edit] Battle of the Durham Station

If you have an argument that it is not true, please nominate it for deletion. I decided to withdraw the AfD because I didn't have sufficient evidence that it is a hoax. --Ineffable3000 01:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I doubt that a hoax is involved. It is difficult to prove a negative, so I hope I took the appropriate course by asking for references. If none are forthcoming after a week or so, the deletion request will be appropriate. It is too bad that there is no better way to be aware of when some of these discussions are taking place. Perhaps my comments would have had a more immediate effect in the appropriate context. When someone referred to getting Google results on the battle, the only one that I got was from a website called brainyhistory.com and I have found that they have spurious entries on there from time to time. Hal Jespersen 14:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Invitation

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Kuzbass_workers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kuzbass_workers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] {{Wdefcon}}

Just a gentle reminder, when editing defcon, please leave a comment as well, and not just change the number. Thanks! - SpLoT 07:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that's fine, but you have to add your comment and your name below as well. - SpLoT 09:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Andeh 16:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spyware Stormer

You reverted an edit I made reverting vandalism on an article. The subject of the article is malware/spyware, and an IP address (most likely someone working with the company) keeps editing it to say that it is legitimate software. Please check edit histories before reverting! Voretus^talk 21:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Revert vandalism

i am here to ask for your help. KojiDude and TTN have been vandalizing and removing information from the Dodoria, Zarbon, and Kiwi pages. They purposely undo edits on the page and they caused for some members to get unnecessarily blocked recently using 3rr as their excuse. Since one member is not allowed to edit the same page reverted during the same 24 hours, they each take turns on these pages, reverting and creating chaos by diminishing the profiles, deleting pictures, and taking out relevant information. I ask you as a fellow wikipedian to please bring a stop to them, either by banning them or some other means of stopping them from editing those pages. Much honesty.

Don't listen to him, he is a possible sockpuppet of a user who's been blocked for one month.--SUIT⁴² 22:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Benjamin Erfe

That wasn't me. That was an IP. I reverted that guy after realizing that wasn't in the article from day 1.

Check the edit history if you don't believe me.--Rmky87 19:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Eralash2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eralash2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Esotericism does not imply non-notability

Hi. I have reverted your inclusion of links to Wikipedia:Esotericism does not imply non-notability in existing notability guidelines or proposals. Since you have just started that proposal and it has yet to receive any sort of feedback, it's way too early to start refering to it in guidelines. If you want some feedback, it's better to post a message on the guidelines talk pages or, once the proposal has matured, on the village pump. Pascal.Tesson 22:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion

It was deleted for a total lack of content beyond the fact that it's an upcoming South Park episode. Nothing personal. - Lucky 6.9 07:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do.  :) - Lucky 6.9 07:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hey Ineffable,

Re FPC of HistMac.gif, I found out about the picture nomination by random wikisurfing! I think I've made comments that illuminate certain dark aspects regarding this picture and would like you to evaluate them and respond here. Thanks! •NikoSilver• 11:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reed Bed panorama

I have uploaded a new version on FPC, which you might check out. It addresses the concerns voiced by the opposers. Greetings, --Janke | Talk 15:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Did you know?

On 23 November 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Rakovor, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 16:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Battle of Grozny (August 1996)

You moved Battle of Grozny (1996) to Battle of Grozny (August 1996). Was there more than one Battle of Grozny in 1996? Why did we need the extra characters? Bejnar 20:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Closure of Siberian Wikipedia

Would you please support us in the closure of this propagandistic esbat? Sign at meta:Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Siberian Wikipedia. Thank you. Voyevoda 23:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Congrats

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Mandelbrot set 2500px.png, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. NauticaShades 10:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:M_dol_dob.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:M_dol_dob.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] stamps copyrighted

Stamps are copyrighted in Russia. You may use Soviet works published before 1954. See {{PD-RU-exempt}} & {{PD-Russia}}. `'mikkanarxi 01:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Page moves

Please refrain from such acts with long-established pages without prior consultations with more experisnced wikipedians. In particular, your moves of Turkish wars are against established naming conventions. In the future, please always refer to wikipedia:Naming conventions. While I myself like to grumble about too much bureaucracy in wikipedia lately, in many cases it does make things more ogranized. `'mikkanarxi 09:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

[edit] Battle of Amstetten

I have completed the article on the Battle of Amstetten. Can you please verify the infromation (esp. numbers) and add additional information to it? I do not have many resources on that specific battle. --Ineffable3000 01:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Sure, glad to help. I've made some revisions, hope they meet with your approval. I have no sources readily at hand either, so I used the numbers based on the Order of Battle at the Austerlitz campaign. There Murat had 7,400 troopers, he probably had much closer to 8,000 at Amstetten, plus part of Lannes' 12,000+ man corps, so at least a division of 3-4,000, giving the French easily 10,000 or more. This wargames miniture site [3] estimates the French as having just over 8,000 engaged. The Coalition was clearly outnumbered, but this is not surprising given the strategic context plus the fact that rear-guards usually act against superior enemy forces, in an attempt to trade lives for time. Time which, in this case, was not very well used. Cheers--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 03:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Battle of Amstetten

Meh, I'm not really an expert on Napoleonic warfare; I'd suggest asking UberCryxic, who knows a lot more about that topic than I do. Kirill Lokshin 03:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I've looked up and added more to the battle. Try this site and see if you agree with my conclusion. Looks like Lannes forces did most of the work. Also note the excellent scouting on the French side and how much it affected the battle. Note that Lannes was commanding a Elite formation and this too was helping the outcome. Given the numbers there was little doubt how it was going to turn out but be aware that the allied force accompished exactly what it intended forcing the French to spend the entire day clearing the position. http://www.napoleonicminiatureswargame.com/amstetten.html Tirronan 20:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I will see if I can find anything more conclusive for you Tirronan 21:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Open City

Hi, I don't have any particular opinion whether the Open City should redirect to the film or to the definition, but please, in the future take care to sort out the incoming links when you re-redirect the page—all 5 links to Open City were meant for the film. Duja► 09:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lists of (insert characteristic) people

Just starting to realise how many of these stupid things there are. As well as beards, moustaches, and baldness- we also seem to have List of famous short men, List of famous short women, List of famous tall men, List of famous tall women. I now worry my flippant examples could spawn whole new ones. Seriously though, do think these should be AfD as well? WJBscribe 05:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Glad you agree. If I find any other similar ones, I shall nominate them myself. WJBscribe 05:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

OK. I'll deal with those. WJBscribe 06:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Just a couple of small notes. One is that "strong" is mostly a waste of time when making a recomendation, it's the arguments that count, not how you feel about them. Second (leading on nicely from that) is that XfD is a debate, not a vote. If by nominating something you provide a clear and lucid rational, preferably backed by policy, there is no need to "vote" with an embolded Delete.
152.91.9.144 06:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to add that, in the future, please only have 2 or 3 proposals for a deletion of articles in the same field open at a time, and please discuss what problems you might have on the article talk page before proposing a deletion. If there's clear violation of wiki-policy, it's not a problem, but you've proposed deletions for numerous articles citing problems that are not considered good reasons for deletion, and are in fact cited as problems that should be fixed without deletion (See WP:Deletion policy). It's particularly annoying when you cite reasons that are not considered valid reasons for deleting an article, e.g. that the List of battles (alphabetical) has non-battles on it and then don't provide any examples of that. It wouldn't hurt you to spend some time making your case for deletion rock-solid. -NorsemanII 05:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] George Vernadsky

Fairuse images are expected to be of low resolution. I suppose if you resize the image there will be no damage to the article but less problems with image police. Furthermore, I urge you to discuss such trivial matters on the relevant talk page (Talk:George Vernadsky) rather than in the urgent announcement section of a general-purpose noticeboard. Thanks for your work, Ghirla ^-трёп- 08:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ЯрГУ

I actually work there :) Don't worry, I have big plans for Yaroslavl-related articles and will take care of them as soon as I have time. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 07:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comment

I wanted to email you but your email is disabled, so I leave my message here.

This was upsetting. Please kindly revert your comment. I surely mean what I posted and your comment is truly undeserved. Please email me with any questions if you need more info to dissuade your doubts. user:No big deal, 06:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] reinstatement of Jawbone under discussion

Hello - the possible reinstatement of Jawbone Radio is being discussed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 December 18, if you'd like to have a look.PaulLev 05:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Allow me

[edit] Writing about math

Hello! Talk:Main Page is strictly for discussion about the main page. I moved your request to Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Writing about math. —David Levy 23:43, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mainpage criticizing

Ok, your comments against 208.19.12.207 on Talk:Main Page were totally unwarranted. This person merely brought up an issue with the donation bar; editing from an IP, not having many edits, and bringing up this issue are not nearly enough to deserve those comments. You should take your own advice: "Follow WP:DICK." ---Slash- 06:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Confused

Could you please explain why you put {{db-author}} on Go God Go XII? [4] EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Go God Go XII. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tubezone 12:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

I can see your intention, but that tag only applies if you are the only contributor to an article. Agathoclea 09:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Anglo-Spanish War (1800s)

I'm not sure that's quite correct. The disambiguation page suggests that there was an interruption in 1802–03, and thus splits the conflict into two wars; but other lists I've seen consider both parts a single war. Kirill Lokshin 06:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK!

On 16 January 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Uruguayan Civil War, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Savidan 05:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:La guerra grande.jpg

Could you provide a more specific description of what is pictured here so I can note it on the main page in the DYK section? Ideally: which nation/faction does the ship represent and what naval battle or blockade is it taking part in? Savidan 05:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I really don't know anything about the topic. If you don't know...at least I don't feel bad about the relatively vague caption. Savidan 05:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

It's probably fine as it is. Even if we knew which Seige it was, that seems a little wordy. Savidan 05:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sokha

I also think a picture is a must. This one seems to be OK (judging from the caption, it was created in the 19th century, so it should be in public domain now), but other than indirect clues I can't find anything regarding this picture's status. It certainly doesn't look like a modern picture to me, but my perception is unfortunately not a guarantee of the picture's free status. I suppose you could email the site and ask them where the picture comes from. I'll also try to scour my (rather limited) home library in case there is anything there.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

By the way, as much as I am ashamed to ask this—what is the difference between a sokha and a plow? Aren't they the same thing?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Regarding your comment at the announcements board, I'll check my unabridged Merriam-Webster tonight to see if this is considered to be a loanword. If not, it might probably be a better idea to make it a subsection in plow anyway. Also, another question: is a sokha much different from an ard?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Sokha is not in Merriam-Webster by the way. Be bold. And can you also take a look at Uchraspred, Rabfak, ad Skhod. --Ineffable3000 17:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Have you looked it up in the unabridged version of Merriam-Webster? If not, you'd be surprised what they have there... As for the other three examples, the first two don't really have an (approximate) equivalent in English the way "sokha" does. "Skhod" can easily be translated as "gathering"; it's a legal term applicable to countries besides Russia.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:00, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Remove the "Loanword" category if you do not think it is a loanword. It is hard to determine whether something should have it's own article or not. [5] has enough information on the sokha to make a big article about it. And I'll just fair use the picture for now. --Ineffable3000 17:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The only sure way (I know of) to find out whether it's a loanword or not is to check the OED. If a word is not there, it's not a loadword but a transliteration. Unfortunately, I don't have access to OED, so I have to make do with unabridged Merriam-Webster, which is not nearly as complete. As for the picture, fair use should be fine for now.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:00, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Will do tonight when I get home.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

There is no entry for sokha in unabridged Merriam-Webster.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 22:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Are you a professor at a university? --Ineffable3000 18:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll take it as a compliment, but no, I am not a professor :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, my knoweledge of the Russian history is not as extensive as you seem to believe. I certainly know more than an average Joe (or Ivan), but not really all that much more. Russian history is among my interests as well, but I never made a point to study it purposfully, and I prefer to contribute to the areas of Wikipedia where I can offer more expertise.

As for the information about myself, that's something I chose not to divulge for personal reasons. Sorry! I can tell that I live in the Midwest, but I'd rather not specify where. North Carolina is kind of ways off from where I live, so we are not really neighbors. I do have an old friend living in Asheville though, but that person does not edit Wikipedia :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

That I am a Russian is a fact I never tried to conceal :) I though it to be obvious... As for the second part of your question, of the three choices you offered "adult" seems to be the best match.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Russian loanword

• Mikkalai, why are you reverting my "Russian loanword" related edits? --Ineffable3000 05:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • See Category:Russian loanwords. `'mikka 16:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
    • I saw it. Elaborate. --Ineffable3000 23:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
      • Words in question fit the definition of the category given there. `'mikka 03:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:NPOV shortcut

Hello, Can you please explain this edit? Was it an accident? [6]

Thanks, ~a (user • talk • contribs) 03:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brahman cattle.JPG

Hello. I am assuming that this is your image of cattle on Commons. The caption under the image as used in the Brahman article states that it is from India. However, I see nothing from the image or you to state where the picture was taken. Perhaps I've overlooked something. Can you comment? (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 17:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Costa Rica Hydroelectric plant

Hi, could you please tell me what the tower is shown in the picture you uploaded as I want to use it in another article to do with industrial plants but I don't know what its function is. Thanks Rexparry sydney 12:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, I think I'll use something else for the piece which is about environmental impacts. Rexparry sydney 03:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:10, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as This article is not true) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Leuko 05:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April Fools Day

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Leuko 05:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with This article is not true. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Very funny, but put in a user subpage or unclyclopedia. The encyclopedia mainspace is no space to joke around. Danski14^(talk) 05:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Leuko 05:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree... I am completely serious about this. You are wasting our time. I will be report you if you continue. Danski14^(talk) 05:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

UM, check the Wikipedia:Community Portal it clearly says April Fools is no excuse. Danski14^(talk) 05:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

• Please cite the policy that says vandalism on April Fools Day is okay. JuJube 05:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why did you delete my page

You said "Write a novel about your life. Do not post your autobiography on Wikipedia. --Ineffable3000 20:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)" but since when is that an autobiography if I didn't write it myself? I was writing about my cousin Rodolfo, but under his name because he wanted to be able to show people his life story. You don't have to be an ass about it assuming stuff you don't know. A lot of the information on the page was stuff he told me and some I already knew. Sorry but...I got to add it again bro. I spent WAY too much time on that page for it to just be deleted for speculated reasons. Extremador 03:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:06, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lost scrapbook.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lost scrapbook.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Opencity-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Opencity-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lots.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lots.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rules of procedure.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rules of procedure.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)