User talk:SirFozzie

Archives

2006

Jan • Dec

2007

Jan • Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug • Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2008

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

[edit] Answering Machine

"We're sorry. SirFozzie is not available to answer his talk page right now. Please leave your request, rant, discussion or threat at the beep, and SirFozzie will get back to you later."

Beep

:( Viridae^Talk 00:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmfph. Bad enough an answering machine...but a "snarky" message too! Have a good unwind. Risker (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recall criteria

Hey Foz, just FYI I've written up one of my own at User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Recall, based pretty much on yours. Gimme a yell if you have any issues with this. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 02:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Srarh777

Hi SirFozzie. Now that (at last) some progress seems to be being made with Sarah, especially that she's agreed (a) that the block was called for and (b) that she won't continue to revert the "X in Ireland" merges, I suggest that we unblock her. Because the block, and Sarah's behaviour, attracted some discussion at WP:ANI, I've started a thread at WP:AN#Unblock of User:Sarah777? so that other admins can input. Please share your thoughts there. Cheers, Waggers (talk) 12:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah, you'd already seen it! Cool. Waggers (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

SirFozzie, just to give you an update, there seems to be gaining consensus for an unblock with a conditional reblock if there are any further issues, up to one year. Allison and one other administrator is willing to mentor Sarah, and I am in agreement that, with restrictions (I outlined this on the talk page), that Sarah be unblocked. Your comments, as you are the blocking administrator, are warranted at her talk page. Thanks, seicer | talk | contribs 20:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Dzonatas

I was contacted today by User:Dzonatas over IRC, apparently this user's upset over their block, and I quote: "I was being harassed, and another user that I after interacted with for two years stepped in and escalted the whole thing against me. Now I can't seem to get anybody to look at my original reason to draw attention on AN/I.". Not sure what to do here, I'm horrible at resolving disputes, but it sounds like this user attacked others after his block. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I have an exact copy of the email he sent Durova, where he uses the phrase "G__ D__n" several times, which was after he was blocked indefinitely by Moreschi (I just reenabled the block with email disabled) . The ANI discussion has been archived. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Dzonatas for a discussion on Dzonatas's behavior. This editor had forum shopped, edited others comments to make it look like they attacked him, and had generally been one of the more Disruptive Editors I have seen lately. I see no reason that he should be unblocked. I denied his first unblock request, and R.Baley denied the 2nd one, and retracted numerous attacks from his talk page. SirFozzie (talk) 02:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ONIH

Allegations are being made about a "retired editor" over at this AFD. As far as I'm aware he's not online any more after moving house. You seem to know him pretty well, could you just confirm that? Thanks.-RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 20:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Off Wiki Decisions

This is not on Sarah777's talk page as it might be considered stirring that specific pot. Elonka claims that she and Alison are "seeking concensus" (between themselves, Elonka says) on User talk:Sarah777. The rest of us have been told, essentially, to go away and play while the grown-ups deal with this. This makes me very uncomfortable, but, being neither an Admin nor an editor of any great moment, perhaps my view is not the mainstream one. Are you comfortable with two, having elected themselves or, to be fair, having been elected by Elonka, deciding for all? I usually ask Rockpocket these types of questions, but he is away at this time. ៛ Bielle (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not as concerned, I have great respect for both of them (and Alison is one of my best friends here. Also, I'm not concerned about the situation, sometimes discussions between folks can get disruptive, and if we can avoid that or "stirring the pot", then I'm for it. It's only a side conversation, not the main one. SirFozzie (talk) 22:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to respond. ៛ Bielle (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Intelligent design RfC

At this RfAR, you've expressed an interest in a RfC on behaviour of editors at articles related to intelligent design. As an outcome, User:Gnixon/Intelligent design RfC provides a Workspace, with discussion at User talk:Gnixon/Intelligent design RfC which I've started off with ideas for a basis to formulate the RfC. which I've started off with ideas for a basis to formulate the RfC. We also must try to resolve the dispute and as a first step my suggestion is developing guidelines or procedures aimed improving behaviour from now on, so that the desired outcomes can be achieved amicably. Your assistance and comments will be much appreciated. . . dave souza, talk 14:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RFC notice

Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sceptre, Sxeptomaniac, SirFozzie, B, where you may want to participate. Odd nature (talk) 23:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, it's a two for the price of one special on RfC's! As things happen to be, I was typing up some information right now. Thank you for the notice SirFozzie (talk) 00:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

(edit conflict) *sigh* - it's BADSITES part deux :/ - Alison ^❤ 00:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, not much surprise, they've made their feelings clear. SirFozzie (talk) 00:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Seeing as it's tarnishing them more than us, I've taken the liberty of having a bit of fun. :p Sceptre ^(talk) 00:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

I just came to see what you were up to SirFozzie and let me tell you that this RfC has kept me entertained for a few dozen minutes now. Teach the controversy indeed. –– Lid^(Talk) 14:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)