Necla Kelek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Necla Kelek [ˈnɛdʒla ˈkɛlɛk] (born December 31, 1957 in Istanbul, Turkey) is a German feminist and social scientist, holding a doctorate in this field, originally from Turkey. She gave lectures on migration sociology at the Evangelische Fachhochschule für Sozialpädagogik (Protestant Institute for Social Education) in Hamburg from 1999 until 2004.

Contents 1 Life 1.1 Involvement for Human Rights 1.2 Scientific and Political Advisory Activities 2 Controversy: Kelek Against "60 Migration Researchers" 2.1 The Petition for "Justice for the Muslims!" 2.2 Kelek's Answer 2.3 Media Reactions 3 Controversy about the mosque in Cologne-Ehrenfeld 4 Quotes 5 Awards 6 Publications 7 Filmography 8 References 9 Other Anti-Islamic Activists 10 External links 10.1 Integration debate 10.2 Articles by Kelek 10.3 Interviews

[edit] Life

The following section regards Kelek's autobiography, which is part of her book, Die fremde Braut (The Foreign Bride).

Kelek's family belonged to the Circassian minority in Turkey. Necla Kelek came with her parents from Turkey to Germany at the age of 11 in 1968. After her parents had maintained a western, secular lifestyle in Istanbul, they turned toward religion in Germany. Once, when Kelek dared to contradict her father, he threathened to kill her with an ax. Her father forbade her to participate in school sports, in order to protect her virginity and to preserve the honor of the family.

Her two older siblings still obeyed the conservative views of their parents. As a youth, she, herself, fled into depression ("Hüzün") and then tried open refusal by her efforts in secondary school and university. She alienated herself more and more from her father and her family, and finally left them entirely.

Necla Kelek was first trained as an engineering draftsman. Later, she studied economy and sociology in Hamburg. She worked in a Turkish travel bureau in Hamburg and in an engineering office in Wiesbaden. She was disowned by her family, since they did not want to allow her the right to be independent. She got her doctoral degree in 2001 with an investigation into the coming of age of women in Islam.

Kelek's research subject is the parallel society characterized by Islam in Germany. She rejects toleration of the repression of both girls and boys in orthodox Islamic families as a misunderstood tolerance. She lives today with her partner.

[edit] Involvement for Human Rights

Similar to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Dutch politician of Somalian origin, or the Egyptian feminist, Sérénade Chafik, Kelek opposes the repression of women in Islam. She is strongly criticized by Islamic organizations for this, especially since she is convinced that there is very little compatibility between Western and Islamic ideals.

The Turkish press, especially, attacks Kelek again and again: feminists like Kelek, Seyran Ateş, Sonja Fatma Bläser and Serap Çileli are accused of "exaggeration". Most women are supposedly not exposed to male control and live in freedom. Until the middle of 2005, this was also the editorial guideline of the liberal-conservative daily paper, Hürriyet, which is very influential among the Turkish people living in Germany: according to a study of the Gesellschaft für Konsumforschung (Society for Consumer Research, GfK) from 2002, forty percent of them had read this paper in the past two weeks. On May 22, 2005, "Hürriyet" started a Germany-wide campaign "against domestic violence". The discussion events in the large German cities got a large response, although the feminists who had previously been attacked refused to participate.

Kelek was a member of the scientific advisory council of the Giordano-Bruno-Stiftung, a "foundation for the support of evolutionary humanism", until May 16, 2007.

[edit] Scientific and Political Advisory Activities

Necla Kelek received her doctorate with an investigation of Islamische Religiosität und ihre Bedeutung in der Lebenswelt von Schülerinnen und Schülern türkischer Herkunft (Islamic religiousness and its importance in the lives of schoolchildren of Turkish background), which appeared as a book in 2002 under the title of Islam im Alltag (Islam in Everyday Life). At that time, she came to the conclusion that schoolchildren individually learn Islam, adapt it to their needs and use it to form their identity. Their Islamic religiousness is not a hindrance to integration, but rather an example of cultural change.

Three years later, Kelek came to quite a different conclusions. In her 2005 book, Die fremde Braut, she mixed autobiography, life stories of Turkish women and literary forms with results of scientific investigations. Now her summary was that Turkish tradition and Islamic religiousness could very well be a hindrance for integration. According to her book, many of the young people born in Germany in the separation phase of their lives were married by their parents to a bride or a groom in their place of origin in Turkey and then brought back to Germany. Thus, integration in Germany was intentionally made more difficult. Kelek showed this with the example of "Gelin", who was brought as a bride from Turkey for an arranged marriage and had no chance or prerequisites at all for integration into German society. To describe this phenomena, Kelek used conversations with Turkish women she became acquainted with in mosques or privately in Germany.

Die fremde Braut became a best seller and was praised in general, even by the critics. The emotionality of the book was felt by the reviewers to be a strength, but there was also clear criticism of sweeping negative statements about the entire segment of the population consisting of Turkish Moslems. A typical example of a reviewer who mixed praise and criticism in this way is Alexandra Senfft in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) on May 31, 2005.^[1] Kelek received the famed Geschwister-Scholl-Preis for Die fremde Braut, a prize which is awarded to a current book that shows intellectual independence and supports civil freedom, moral, intellectual and aesthetic courage and that gives an important impulse to the present awareness of responsibility. The lauditory speech was given by Heribert Prantl, head of the domestic policy department of the Süddeutschen Zeitung and former state prosecutor.

Necla Kelek commonly gives interview and makes political statements in very emphatic and often polemic form. For instance, she pled in the die tageszeitung (taz) of January 16, 2006, for the controversial citizenship test of the state government of Baden-Württemberg, which she described as a "Pasha Test".^[2] This test caused quite a stir at the beginning of 2006, as it would require Moslems who wanted to be naturalized in the state of Baden-Württemberg to answer questions to check their loyalty to the constitution and their fundamental attitudes. Kelek also made evaluations like these: According to investigations of the Federal Family Ministry, at least every second Turkish woman is married in the way described. There should therefore be several thousand cases each year.^[3] These investigations allegedly referred to the study presented by Family Minister Renate Schmidt in 2004 concerning violence against women in Germany. But it did not cover Kelek's numerical evaluations.^[4]

Today, Kelek is in demand as an expert on the subject of Islamic culture in the Western world. In her publication, Die verlorenen Söhne (The Lost Sons, 2006), her central theme is the influence of Islam on the small family. The book is based on Kelek's research project on the subject of "parallel society" at the Evangelischen Fachhochschule für Sozialpädagogik in Hamburg. Here also, Kelek merges autobiographical details, observations, conversations with Turkish retirees and the results of interviews with Turkish prison convicts. She counsels the Hamburg justice authorities on questions about the treatment of Turkish Moslem prisoners. In preparation for the Deutscher Evangelischer Kirchentag 2005 in Hannover, she was invited to participate in the project group. In addition, she counsels the Baden-Württemberg state government regarding their legislative initiative to make forced marriage a punishable offense. She is a permanent member in the Islamic Conference appointed by the German federal government and a free-lance author for the women's magazine, "Emma", and many daily newspapers, among others.

[edit] Controversy: Kelek Against "60 Migration Researchers"

[edit] The Petition for "Justice for the Muslims!"

Shortly before the appearance of Kelek's family sociology study in mid-March of 2006, the weekly paper Die Zeit published on February 2, 2006 an open letter, described as a petition and signed by 60 scientists from the social sciences field in general and migration research in particular, on the integration policy of Germany. The authors were the Bremen professor for intercultural education, Yasemin Karakaşoğlu, and the Cologne psychologist and journalist, Mark Terkessidis.^[5] It is directed against the prominent position of Kelek in the official political discourse, whom it accuses of working unscientifically. While Kelek had still done serious research in her dissertation, she now - contrary to her research results of that time - generalized individual cases into examples of generic features of Moslem migrants with her book and her newspaper articles. There is no dispute at all that forced marriages and honor killings exist, but arranged marriages (in contrast to forced marriages) can also be traced back to the emergence of marriage markets between the country of origin and the target of migration, which are in turn "the consequence of Europe's policy of separation". It is thus often not motivated by the desire for legal migration. This would not be seen, if one (as for instance, Kelek) put an interpretation model of the sweeping confrontation of "Islam" and "Western civilization" on the phenomena in general.

[edit] Kelek's Answer

Kelek was given the opportunity to reply in the same edition of the newspaper,^[6] which was also reprinted by the daily paper taz on February 3. She refrained from going further into the accusations directed against her and on her part, accused those who signed the petition of arguing unscientifically. Despite the actual state of affairs, they represent the illusion of the successful integration of Moslem migrants. Despite daily events which contradict this view, the representatives of the academic majority opinion would rather criticize the bearer of bad news than their own views or their "ideological concept of multiculturalism" She intensified her reply, by accusing the "critics from the well-equipped world of the publicly financed migration research" of being "responsible for the failure of the integration policy for 30 years." The true purpose of their objection is "anxiety about their research funds."

[edit] Media Reactions

The media echo was intense. In the daily, conservative newspapers Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung^[7][8] and Die Welt,^[9] articles appeared which clearly took sides for Kelek's positions. The daily, left-wing newspaper die tageszeitung gave adjacent space to a sharp critic of Kelek and to Kelek herself.^[10][11] After that, only negative articles had a chance of appearing in the taz. Various statements also appeared in the liberal Frankfurter Rundschau, including a guest article by Rahel Volz of Terre des Femmes, which supported Kelek in many respects,^[12] as well as an article by Mark Terkessidis, who defended the "petition", as one of its authors.^[13] The NZZ of February 11, 2006 ^[14] was rather critical of both sides. The FAZ of February 9, 2006, faulted the "petition of 60 migration researchers" for the fact that only one fifth of the social scientists worked in the field of migration research about the Turks.^[15]

Necla Kelek and Seyran Ates received support from Hartmut Krauss, Osnabruck editor and initator of the Study Group of Critical Marxists, whose "opposing call", with the title, "Gerechtigkeit für demokratische Islamkritikerinnen" (Justice for democratic Islam critics) was signed by 53 people (among which were journalists, scientists, engineers, authors and human rights activists, the latter chiefly from Iraq and Iran). In that, it says that honor killings, forced marriage and a basic patriarchal orientation, just as anti-Jewish conspiracy ideologies and lack of respect for a secular democratic societal order, are "to be taken seriously and are not marginal phenomena within the Islamic cultural community". For that reason, an "undifferentiated general amnesty for all Moslems" cannot be allowed. The position of the "migration scientists" is above all criticized because the negative manifestations with migrants are always sweepingly derived from the "racism of the receiving society", however that the anti-emancipation potential of Islam is disregarded. As long as this is tabooed, it is "rather difficult to develop an appropriate integration discourse".^[16]

Alice Schwarzer defended Necla Kelek against the criticism in an article in the FAZ of February 11, 2006, which was reprinted in the feminist monthly Emma;^[17] she had bravely broken the silence about a societal taboo. Schwarzer associated this statement with strong personal criticism of the authors of the open letter: Yasemin Karakasoglu is "very, very closely allied with the Islamic scene in Germany"; Mark Terkessidis is merely a self-promoter and "has little to do with understanding of the world".

The well-known migration researcher, Werner Schiffauer, shared the opinions contained in the open letter, but had not signed it because the criticism should have been addressed to the German public, instead of Kelek, in his opinion: "Necla Kelek should not be attacked, rather the German public, who had only waited for someone like Kelek to confirm everything they had always thought about Moslems."^[9] He reckoned in Kelek's favor that she had brought up the subject of family relations in migrant families, which had been neglected until then.

[edit] Controversy about the mosque in Cologne-Ehrenfeld

Neckla Kelek backed the misgivings of Ralph Giordano about building a mosque in Cologne-Ehrenfeld. She argued, among other things, that an Islam is practiced in Germany which has proven to be a hindrance for integration. These mosques are nucleii of a counter-society. They teach the philosophy of another society and practice a life in the spirit of the sharia. Already, the children would learn the separation from the German society.^[18]

[edit] Quotes

• The chador makes the women into a depersonalized nothing. Necla Kelek ^[18]

[edit] Awards

• 2006: Mercator-Professur of the Universität Duisburg-Essen  ^[19]
• 2006: Corine-Sachbuchpreis (non-fiction book prize) for Die verlorenen Söhne. Plädoyer für die Befreiung des türkisch-muslimischen Mannes (The lost sons, plea for the liberation of the Turkish Moslem man)
• 2005: Geschwister-Scholl-Preis   Speech by Heribert Prantl

[edit] Publications

• 2007: Türkische Karriere. Allein unter Männern. In Anatolien. (Turkish career. Alone among men. In Anatolia.) In: Ulrike Ackermann (Publ.): Welche Freiheit. Plädoyers für eine offene Gesellschaft. (Which freedom. Plea for an open society.) Matthes & Seitz, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-88221-885-5,(also online)
• 2007: Erziehungsauftrag und Integration: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Integrationshemmnissen (Educational task and integration: a debate with integration impediments), in: Deutsche Jugend, Vol. 55, No. 2, 53 - 59.
• 2006: Die verlorenen Söhne. Plädoyer für die Befreiung des türkisch-muslimischen Mannes. (The lost sons. Plea for the liberation of the Turkish Moslem man) Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 3-462-03686-6
  - Excerpts from the concluding chapter
• 2005: Die fremde Braut. Ein Bericht aus dem Inneren des türkischen Lebens in Deutschland. (The foreign bride. A report from the inside of Turkish life in Germany) Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 3-462-03469-3
  - Discussion by Rupert Neudeck and by Otto Schily in the Spiegel, Critical review by Ismail Küpeli in analyse & kritik
• 2002: Islam im Alltag. Islamische Religiosität und ihre Bedeutung in der Lebenswelt von Schülerinnen und Schülern türkischer Herkunft. (Islam in everyday life. Islamic religiousness and its importance in the lives of schoolchildren of Turkish background) Waxmann, Münster, ISBN 3-8309-1169-6 (dissertation)

[edit] Filmography

• 2006: Islam - zwischen Fundamentalismus und Reform. (Islam - between fundamentalism and reform.) SWR, "Literatur im Foyer" by Thea Dorn, Television discussion with Neclá Kelek, Nahed Selim and Ralph Ghadban, 58 min., first broadcast: April 7, 2006
• 2005: Verschleierte Unterdrückung? Die Frauen und der Islam. (Veiled repression? Women and Islam.) SWR, Television discussion with Necla Kelek and Seyran Ateş, 44 min., first broadcast: March 8, 2005 ^[20]

[edit] References

• This article was initially translated from the Wikipedia article Necla Kelek, specifically from this version.

[edit] Other Anti-Islamic Activists

• Seyran Ateş
• Ayaan Hirsi Ali
• Wafa Sultan
• Irshad Manji

[edit] External links

[edit] Integration debate

• "Debatte um Necla Kelek. Importbräute für verlorene Söhne" (Debate about Necla Kelek. Import brides for lost sons", Spiegel Online, March 16, 2006 by Henryk Broder
• "Gerechtigkeit für die Muslime!" (Justice for Moslems!), Die Zeit, February 2, 2006, No. 6, Petition of the 60 migration researchers
• Falsche Freiheit - Eine Replik auf die "Petition" der 60 Migrationsforscher (False freedom - a reply to the "petition" of the 60 migration researchers), FAZ, February 3, 2006
• "Porträt Necla Kelek, Soziologin" (Portrait of Necla Kelek, sociologist), Tagesspiegel, September 17, 2005
• "Warum nur schauen so viele weg?" (Why ever do so many look away?), Süddeutsche Zeitung, April 11, 2005

[edit] Articles by Kelek

• "Freiheit, die ich meine" (Freedom that I mean), FAZ, December 15, 2007
• "Das Minarett ist ein Herschaftssymbol" (The minarette is a symbol of control), FAZ, June 5, 2007
• "Beitrag zum Integrationsstreit zwischen Ian Buruma und Pascal Bruckner" (Article on the integration dispute between Ian Buruma and Pascal Bruckner), Perlentaucher, February 5, 2007
• "Heimat, ja bitte!" (Home country, yes please!), Zeit, March 9, 2006, No. 11 (Excerpt from the last chapter of "Die verlorenen Söhne")
• "Sie haben das Leid anderer zugelassen!" (You have allowed the misfortune of others!), Die Zeit, February 8, 2006, No. 7, "Eine Antwort auf den offenen Brief von 60 Migrationsforschern: Sie ignorieren Menschenrechtsverletzungen, weil sie nicht in ihr Konzept von Multikulturalismus passen." (An answer to the open letter of 60 migration researchers: You ignore human rights violations because they do not fit in your concept of multiculturalism.)
• Speech of gratitude for the Geschwister-Scholl-Preis, taz, November 15, 2005 (excerpt)
• "Anwälte einer Inszenierung" (Advocates of a production), Zeit, September 17, 2005, Report about the Hatun Sürücü trial by N. Kelek. Sürücü, from a strongly religious Moslem family, was murdered by her family in February of 2005 for leaving a forced marriage and leading a Western lifestyle.

[edit] Interviews

• "Frauen werden zu Unruhestifterinnen stigmatisiert" (Women are stigmatized as troublemakers), Spiegel Online, July 5, 2006
• "Sie wissen nicht: Liebe ist erlaubt" (They don't know: love is permitted), Hamburger Abendblatt, April 5, 2006
• "Glück gibt es nur ohne den Vater" (There is only happiness without father), Berliner Zeitung, March 25, 2006, Feuilleton page 31
• "Integration. Eure Familien, unsere Familien" (Integration. Your families, our families), FAZ, February 24, 2006
• "Das ist eine Art Pascha-Test" (That is a kind of Pasha test), Tagesspiegel, January 19, 2006, on the "conversation themes"
• "Geschwister-Scholl-Preis an türkeikritische Schriftstellerin" (Geschwister-Scholl-Preis to Turkish-critical author), Münchner Merkur, September 29, 2005
• "Es sind verlorene Söhne" (They are lost sons), taz, September 23, 2005
• "Zwangsehe & Ehrenmord in Deutschland – Muslimische Frauen fordern: Schluss mit Multikulti-Toleranz" (Forced marriages and honor killing in Germany - Moslem women demand: end the multicultural tolerance), Interview with Kelek, 3sat, June 19, 2005, also as a video
• "Gefängnis Familie. Eine Frau bricht das Tabu des Schweigens" (Prison family. A woman breaks the taboo of silence), Sicherheit heute, January 30, 2005
• Mr. Buruma's stereotypes, an international debate about multiculturalism at signandsight.com.
• Happier without father, an interview with Michaela Schlagenwerth with Necla Kelek at signandsight.com.