User talk:Merbabu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] A find
Wonogiri Regency - tired of blue and grey links, really aching for non notable red links - then we have the art for you SatuSuro 04:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
As for the rupiah art - theres gotta be a massive copyvio somewhere in there? SatuSuro 07:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you for your correction plus "sindiran" about "reverence"
Yeah, I admit it, sometimes I make mistakes in english, especially often mixed between f and v, soo I understand, I need to study my english better. Btw, wikipedia is where everybody can contribute, if there's some mistakes, other contributors can edit and make things better, right..? Can you do it more nicely without humiliating or patronizing other contributors? Oh yeah, I want to congratulate you for suceed to become one of my least favourite person here in wikipedia.
I promise to tried harder not to make some foolish english grammar mistakes again in the future , so I don't have to deal with, or being humiliated by a person like you. Looking forward to -not- hearing from you, cheers...
Btw, good luck on editing, erasing or undo any unreferenced common knowledge. I'm sure you'll have tons of something like that lurking in wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunkarta (talk • contribs) 09:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Origin myth
Hi, I was just a bit curious about this edit. I don't think I understand the difference here. If there really is a difference, then maybe there shouldn't be a wikilink at all (since origin myth is a redirect). Thanks for clarifying, Ben (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC).
I'm sorry that I reply your message by now. You sent me message roughly a year ago concerning Wali Songo article. I think I haven't edited wikipedia articles ever since or I just don't know that I got message, that's why I didn't read your message. Sorry that my editings didn't provide citations - which I have corrected by now.
My reference is a book by Slamet Muljana - 'Runtuhnya Kerajaan Hindu-Jawa dan timbulnya negara2 islam di nusantara'. Im not fanatical about his thesis on Wali Songo being Chinese descents(there's no absolute truth in history anyway), but I just wanna present other perspective about things. Because there's possibility that such thesis is being rejected by the government or standard history books just because New Order's negative sentiment toward the Chinese descents.
Anyway, Im still a newcomer/amateur in this wikipedia stuffs coz Im not quite active and I still dont understand its rules norms etc - so pardon me if I still make mistakes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoko santoso (talk • contribs) 14:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jakarta
Agreed about the 2% figure. Talking of silly data, Kompas newspaper once printed that the density of cars in Jakarta was 3.2 per square meter, presumably because they assumed that a square kilometer is 1000 square meters! Davidelit (talk) 13:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Doh
Just realised you have a holiday the day petrol prices go up, we are officialy normal over here - but if you read the stories about our power sources - hahah - SatuSuro 02:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jakarta International School
Why did you remove the citation from the New York Times regarding the number of nationalities at the school? Also, per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Alumni: "if an alumnus has their own article in mainspace, then it is not necessary for their notability to be referenced, as long as it is done on their actual page." --Jh12 (talk) 03:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merbabu
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you.
Don't think I don't know about you, either. This is in reference to edits seen in this history: [1] Now please leave the article to others who are much better placed to select more neutral images of you because it appears you are simply trying to select the most impressive mountain-like image rather than looking like a mole hill... Sarah 14:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
