User talk:Jonny2x4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives of my user talk page from the last two years.

• Archive (2005)
• Archive (2006)
• Archive (2007)

Contents 1 Thanks for improving Juni and Juli 2 Third Energy 3 3rd *Strike* 4 Sheng Long merge proposal 5 About Gutsoon 6 Super Contra 7 Regarding M. Bison and the "canonicity" (did I make up a word?) of Alpha 1 8 19xx Title.png 9 Tiamat's Plot Guide 10 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jessica Haggar.png) 11 WAF 12 Do you think this a reliable source for MGS?

[edit] Thanks for improving Juni and Juli

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for reverting what you thought was an inadequate page move and doing editing work on the old article Juni and Juli it is very nice to see someone tackle a "problem" head on Sin Harvest (talk) 10:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I prefer your solution a lot more

[edit] Third Energy

Erm... the reason that it was a seperate article is because the "Dino Crisis (Series)" page had been remomoved... cos that page had over 2000bytes of info whilst the page it is now redirected to has a small sentance about it and a link to it which links back to it self. It it possible for you do re-add the article "Dino Crisis (Series)"?.OsirisV (talk) 16:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The last thing Wikipedia needs is another overly-detailed in-universe article about a plot element from a semi-notable video game series. Anything that can be said about the "third energy" is simply just plot summary from the Dino Crisis games. I just don't see anything any reason for the article existing other than "Third Energy did this in this game and did that in the other game", which are details that can easily be written into the plot summaries of the individual games. And since Third Energy was already introduced in the original game, it makes sense to redirect the article there. Jonny2x4 (talk) 16:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3rd *Strike*

• Just for future reference, the game is called "Street Fighter III 3rd Strike", not "3rd Impact". ^_^ JuJube (talk) 09:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Whatever. Its a common mistake anyway. Jonny2x4 (talk) 18:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sheng Long merge proposal

I still have Alan Noon's info, a bit more on the Akuma factor, the SF:TM ending, and the EGM mention all regarding Sheng Long to work into that article, and all are citable. Given nobody has voice an opinion for the merge, mind if I remove the proposal at this point?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure, okay. Jonny2x4 (talk) 04:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] About Gutsoon

You know it's okay to make big changes, but it's supposed to be a group working on the article. It is not okay to delete the whole article and make it yours. I would really appreciate it if you would talk it out on the talk page, you do realize that I put work into that. –Jump Guru 16:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I only edited the article so it read less like a lists of magazines and titles and more like an overview of the company's history and clarify a few things (Gutsoon never published Angel Heart outside Japan, only City Hunter). I make no such claim of ownership of the article, I was just being bold. Jonny2x4 15:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry about that. That was one of my first articles, and i'll move this to the bottom by the way. I understand what you did. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 16:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't think we should merge the article, it's talking more about RAIJIN COMICS than Gutsoon! I've also heard they were going to make a shojo magazine called Smile Magazine. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 16:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Please respond..... I feel asamed.... now that I think about it, did I post that comment on April Fool's day?!? You're never going to trust me now.... that was stupid (I wrote that on April Fool's day on accident). Please, i'm serios, forgive me, forgive me!! That was back when I was an amateur, now i'm alot better: see Jump SQ., it's almost at a GA rating. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 20:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Smile magazine has nothing to with Gutsoon! It was a shojo manga anthology published by Tokyopop. I still think Gutsoon! Entertainment and Raijin Comics should be merged, since there's not much you can say about one without mentioning the other, but I don't feel the need to go through the trouble of doing it right now.Jonny2x4 (talk) 21:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Maybe they should, maybe they shouldn't. But seriosly forgive me.... say, i'll make it up to you... how bout' ice cream? Chocolate of French Vanilla? – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@^{Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia} 03:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Super Contra

How did you know easily about the Super Contra game for mobile? I'd have never figured it out and now, I'm on a frenzy to get more information. You got good sources, because that's something I'd take probably over a year to know about. Do you know any other site where I can get more information on this game and if the game's J2ME-based? Do you any other "rare" Contra conversions/ports that aren't listed on the Contra articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.216.229 (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I simply learned about it from the official Contra DS website. It was simply an accident that I've come to learn about it. I don't really know much about it other than what is stated in the official site. Jonny2x4 (talk) 05:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding M. Bison and the "canonicity" (did I make up a word?) of Alpha 1

• You're a good editor and I don't want to get into a drawn out edit war about this. I can only speculate that Capcom of America has made a statement overriding Capcom of Japan's statement that Alpha 1 did not happen, which while making no sense whatsoever is par for the course for CoA. :/ Several endings are brazenly impossible, most notably Guy's and Dan's... but anyway, I'd just like to hear who's saying Alpha 1 is canon. JuJube (talk) 07:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

• • I don't think Capcom ever said that Street Fighter Alpha 1 never happened. The closest thing they said was simply that SFA1 and SFA2 share the same story, which is a different thing. But the point is moot either way. I think its ridiculous to cover M. Bison's fictional history from the series' fictional chronology instead of covering from a real world's perspective. (i.e: Street Fighter II came BEFORE Street Fighter Alpha and not the other way around). Jonny2x4 (talk) 07:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

• • • From the Tiamat Plot FAQ (which is essentially a compilation of mooks, official books and statements from Capcom):

Story: You see the endings and all those storyline bits that happen in Street Fighter Zero 1? FORGET EVERYTHING ABOUT THEM. Capcom has officially stated that Street Fighter Zero 2 and Zero 3 is the current bridge between SF1 and 2. Even several of the non-conflicting endings in SFZ1 that don't conflict with SFZ2 have official statements that contradict them, really (not for all, though). Considering that Zero 1 was actually incomplete version of Zero 2 and Zero 3, this makes sense, too (another official statement. And also why Zero 1 had such a freaking small playable characters roster). However, there are some endings that look like they could eerily fit in and be merged with SFZ2.

The point is not moot as long as we have biographies of characters based on their canon storyline. Cheers. JuJube (talk) 02:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 19xx Title.png

Hello Jonny2x4,

I wish to contact you about the flyer you uploaded for 19XX: The War Against Destiny back in January. It appeared that you saved it over my image of the game's title screen which I uploaded back in August of last year. However my biggest concern though is that your flyer uses the rationale of my title screen, causing the image to be, well largely disjointed.

If possible, could you maybe upload the flyer again under a new name and with a proper rationale regarding fair-use of the flyer. Then I can either upload the title screen again or just simply request for it to be deleted.

If you wish to talk to me about this or have any queries, please don't hesitate to do so on my talk page and I'll be glad to assist.

Thank you for contributing and keep it up. Raphie (talk) 12:07, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Done! Jonny2x4 (talk) 15:06, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tiamat's Plot Guide

And since when was it decided it wasn't a reliable source? You know of any other sources for translations of what's in a lot of those sources he uses? :P--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

No. Just because he's the only source, that doesn't make him 100% reliable. My issue with Tiamat's FAQ is that he mixes his sources with too much original research on his part. If you're so eager to create an accurate article, just learn Japanese yourself and cites the sources he cites. I already wrote a paragraph or two explaining why I don't trust Tiamat's FAQ entirely at JuJube's talk page (see here). Jonny2x4 (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jessica Haggar.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessica Haggar.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WAF

Just a short note that I like it! dorftrottel (talk) 06:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm gonna add another one, btw. Jonny2x4 (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Do you think this a reliable source for MGS?

It gives a lot of useful info about the making of the game. Be there is is no credit given to how they know it. [1] Buc (talk) 12:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

A lot of their information seems paraphrased from here, so we might end up with some recursive references. It doesn't seem very reliable in my opinion. Jonny2x4 (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)