User talk:Kung Fu Man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
| Archive #1 |
Contents |
[edit] Cookie
JuJube (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
JuJube (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tetris Evolution
I noticed that you have recently redirected this page. I do hope that you will be updating the entry on List of Tetris variants and im a bit surprised that this redirect wasnt previously discussed on the articles talk page. please correct me if i am wrong. Salavat (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. Im not planning on updating anything so its up to you. I mostly deal with images, got an orphaned message bout the game's cover, thats what brought my attention to the change. Thanks, Salavat (talk) 13:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] EarthBound (series)
KFM, I would like to congratulate you and say "thank you" for not senselessly edit warring or reverting when it came to the EarthBound (series)/Mother (series) article, and actually taking the time to find sources to back your claim; cheers. PeanutCheeseBar (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Fighting game mechanics
I have nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Reubenkee.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Reubenkee.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 01:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Unmerging certain articles
Do you think we should look at certain Mario, Pokémon, and other series character articles should be unmerged? If so, we should check up on some of them, and check if there are any sources for notability. - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Just as a reminder, please start a discussion before restoring any articles. Just link to your sandbox in a new discussion when you think it is ready. TTN (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tetris (handheld game)
Well, I personally think that the Game Boy game is so notable that it's earned the right to have the main (handheld game) title. I wouldn't object to a disambig for the other handheld games on the top. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Voicing opinions
Never hurts to voice an opinion. Once Sam and Kirill voted against me, I would have been surprised to see FloNight disagree. There are a few more arbitrators left to vote.Kww (talk) 19:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bureaucrat
Why are you merging so many Baldur's Gate Articles? your basically deleting articles that have adequate detail and sourcing? What gives you the right?
Dumoren (talk) 08:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Attn: KFM.
I saw in the SFIV talk page you said some things about the usual crap from Ono.
In all fairness, what's your POV on this man?
Because I think we might have similar stances on him.--Kim Kusanagi (talk) 17:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
