Demokrasi İndeksi
Vikipedi, özgür ansiklopedi
Bu sayfa, başka dilde bir Vikipedi'den çevrilmektedir. Siz de yardım etmek istiyorsanız ya da çeviri yarıda kalmışsa, çalışmaya katılan kişilerle iletişime geçip, sayfanın durumunu onlara sorabilirsiniz. Sayfanın geçmişine baktığınızda, sayfa üzerinde çalışma yapanları görebilirsiniz. |
The Economist'deki bir çalışma, 167 ülkede demokrasinin durumunu sınadı ve beş genel kategoride odaklanan demokrasinin bir indeksle bunu ölçmeyi denedi: özgür ve adil seçim, vatandaş özgürlükleri, devlet fonksiyonları, politik katılım ve politik kültür. İsveç, 10 üzerinden 9,88 alarak birinciliği taşırken, listenin sonunda 1,03 puan ile Kuzey Kore var. [1][2] "Tam Demokrasiler", "Yarı Demokrasiler", ve "Karma Rejimler" demokrasi olarak nitelendirildi ve "Otoriter Rejimler" diktatörlük olarak değerlendirildi..
Konu başlıkları |
[değiştir] Metoloji
As described in the report, the democracy index is a kind of weighted average based on the answers of 60 questions, each one with either two or three permitted alternative answers. Most answers are "experts' assessments"; the report does not indicate what kinds of experts, nor their number, nor whether the experts are employees of The Economist or e.g. independent scolars, nor the nationalities of the experts. Some answers are provided by public opinion surveys from the respective countries. "In the case of countries for which survey results are missing, survey results for similar countries and expert assesments are used in order to fill in gaps."
The questions are distributed into the five categories enumerated supra. Each answer is translated to a mark, either 0 or 1, or for the three answer alternative questions, 0.5. With the exceptions infra, seemingly, the sums are added within each category, multiplied by ten, and divided by the total number of questions within the category. There are a few modifying dependencies, which are explained much more precisely than the main rule procedures. In a few cases, an answer yielding zero for one question voids another question; e.g., if the elections for national legislation and head of government are not considered free (question 1), then the the next question, "Are elections... fair?" is not considered, but automatically marked zero. Likewise, there are a few questions considered so important that a low score on them yields a penalty on the total score sum for their respective categories, namely
- "Whether national elections are free and fair";
- "The security of voters";
- "The influence of foreign powers on government";
- "The capability of the civil servants to implement politics".
The five category indices, which all are listed in the report, then are averaged to find the democracy index for a given country. Finally, the the democracy index, rounded to one decimal, decides the classification of the country, as quoted:
- Full democracies—scores of 8-10.
- Flawed democracies—scores of 6 to 7.9.
- Hybrid regimes—scores of 4 to 5.9.
- Authoritarian regimes—scores below 4.
The report discusses other indices of democracy, as defined e.g. by Freedom House, and argues for some of the choices made by the team from The Economist. E.g., in this comparison, a higher emphasis has been put on the public opinion and attitudes, as measured by public surveys, but on the other hand, economic living standard has not been weighted as one criterion of democracy (as seemingly some other investigators have done).
There is no indication whatsoever that this report has been presented or is planned to be presented in any academic context, or in any manner has been checked by or will be checked by a peer review.
[değiştir] Ocak 2007 sıralaması
№ | Country | Index | Category |
---|---|---|---|
1 | İsveç | 9,88 | İşleyen demokrasi |
2 | İzlanda | 9,71 | İşleyen demokrasi |
3 | Hollanda | 9,66 | İşleyen demokrasi |
4 | Norveç | 9,55 | İşleyen demokrasi |
5 | Danimarka | 9,52 | İşleyen demokrasi |
6 | Finlandiya | 9,25 | İşleyen demokrasi |
7 | Lüksemburg | 9,10 | İşleyen demokrasi |
8 | Avusturalya | 9,09 | İşleyen demokrasi |
9 | Kanada | 9,07 | İşleyen demokrasi |
10 | İsviçre | 9,02 | İşleyen demokrasi |
11 | Resim:Flag of Republic of Ireland.svgİrlanda | 9,01 | İşleyen demokrasi |
11 | Yeni Zelanda | 9,01 | İşleyen demokrasi |
13 | Almanya | 8,82 | İşleyen demokrasi |
14 | Avusturya | 8,69 | İşleyen demokrasi |
15 | Malta | 8,39 | İşleyen demokrasi |
16 | İspanya | 8,34 | İşleyen demokrasi |
17 | Amerika Birleşik Devletleri | 8,22 | İşleyen demokrasi |
18 | Çek Cumhuriyeti | 8,17 | İşleyen demokrasi |
19 | Portekiz | 8,16 | İşleyen demokrasi |
20 | Belçika | 8,15 | İşleyen demokrasi |
20 | Japonya | 8,15 | İşleyen demokrasi |
22 | Yunanistan | 8,13 | İşleyen demokrasi |
23 | Birleşik Krallık | 8,08 | İşleyen demokrasi |
24 | Fransa | 8,07 | İşleyen demokrasi |
25 | Mauritius | 8,04 | İşleyen demokrasi |
25 | Kosta Rika | 8,04 | İşleyen demokrasi |
27 | Slovenya | 7,96 | İşleyen demokrasi |
28 | Uruguay | 7,96 | İşleyen demokrasi |
29 | Güney Afrika Cumhuriyeti | 7,91 | Flawed democracy |
30 | Şili | 7,89 | Flawed democracy |
31 | Güney Kore | 7,88 | Flawed democracy |
32 | Tayvan | 7,82 | Flawed democracy |
33 | Estonya | 7,74 | Flawed democracy |
34 | İtalya | 7,73 | Flawed democracy |
35 | Hindistan | 7,68 | Flawed democracy |
36 | Botswana | 7,60 | Flawed democracy |
36 | Kıbrıs | 7,60 | Flawed democracy |
38 | Macaristan | 7,53 | Flawed democracy |
39 | Cape Verde | 7,43 | Flawed democracy |
39 | Litvanya | 7,43 | Flawed democracy |
41 | Slovakya | 7,40 | Flawed democracy |
42 | Brezilya | 7,38 | Flawed democracy |
43 | Letonya | 7,37 | Flawed democracy |
44 | Panama | 7,35 | Flawed democracy |
45 | Jamaika | 7,34 | Flawed democracy |
46 | Polonya | 7,30 | Flawed democracy |
47 | İsrail | 7,28 | Flawed democracy |
48 | Trinidad ve Tobago | 7,18 | Flawed democracy |
49 | Bulgaristan | 7,10 | Flawed democracy |
50 | Romanya | 7,06 | Flawed democracy |
51 | Hırvatistan | 7,04 | Flawed democracy |
52 | Ukrayna | 6,94 | Flawed democracy |
53 | Meksika | 6,67 | Flawed democracy |
54 | Arjantin | 6,63 | Flawed democracy |
55 | Sırbistan | 6,62 | Flawed democracy |
56 | Moğolistan | 6,60 | Flawed democracy |
57 | Sri Lanka | 6,58 | Flawed democracy |
58 | Karadağ | 6,57 | Flawed democracy |
59 | Namibya | 6,54 | Flawed democracy |
59 | Papua Yeni Gine | 6,54 | Flawed democracy |
61 | Surinam | 6,52 | Flawed democracy |
62 | Moldova | 6,50 | Flawed democracy |
63 | Lesotho | 6,48 | Flawed democracy |
63 | Filipinler | 6,48 | Flawed democracy |
65 | Endonezya | 6,41 | Flawed democracy |
65 | Resim:Flag of Timor-Leste.svgDoğu Timor | 6,41 | Flawed democracy |
67 | Kolombiya | 6,40 | Flawed democracy |
68 | Resim:Flag of Republic of Macedonia.svgMakedonya | 6,33 | Flawed democracy |
69 | Honduras | 6,25 | Flawed democracy |
70 | El Salvador | 6,22 | Flawed democracy |
71 | Paraguay | 6,16 | Flawed democracy |
71 | Benin | 6,16 | Flawed democracy |
73 | Guyana | 6,15 | Flawed democracy |
74 | Resim:Flag of Dominican Republic.svgDominik Cumhuriyeti | 6,13 | Flawed democracy |
75 | Bangladeş | 6,11 | Flawed democracy |
76 | Peru | 6,11 | Flawed democracy |
77 | Guatemala | 6,07 | Flawed democracy |
78 | Hong Kong | 6,03 | Flawed democracy |
79 | Filistin | 6,01 | Flawed democracy |
80 | Mali | 5,99 | Flawed democracy |
81 | Malezya | 5,98 | Flawed democracy |
81 | Bolivya | 5,98 | Flawed democracy |
83 | Arnavutluk | 5,91 | Hybrid regime |
84 | Singapur | 5,89 | Hybrid regime |
85 | Madagaskar | 5,82 | Hybrid regime |
85 | Lübnan | 5,82 | Hybrid regime |
87 | Bosna Hersek | 5,78 | Hybrid regime |
88 | Türkiye | 5,70 | Hybrid regime |
89 | Nikaragua | 5,68 | Hybrid regime |
90 | Tayland | 5,67 | Hybrid regime |
91 | Fiji | 5,66 | Hybrid regime |
92 | Ekvador | 5,64 | Hybrid regime |
93 | Veneuzela | 5,42 | Hybrid regime |
94 | Senegal | 5,37 | Hybrid regime |
95 | Gana | 5,35 | Hybrid regime |
96 | Mozambik | 5,28 | Hybrid regime |
97 | Zambia | 5,25 | Hybrid regime |
98 | Liberya | 5,22 | Hybrid regime |
99 | Tanzanya | 5,18 | Hybrid regime |
100 | Uganda | 5,14 | Hybrid regime |
101 | Kenya | 5,08 | Hybrid regime |
102 | Rusya | 5,02 | Hybrid regime |
103 | Malavi | 4,97 | Hybrid regime |
104 | Gürcistan | 4,90 | Hybrid regime |
105 | Kamboçya | 4,77 | Hybrid regime |
106 | Etiyopya | 4,72 | Hybrid regime |
107 | Burundi | 4,51 | Hybrid regime |
108 | Gambiya | 4,39 | Hybrid regime |
109 | Haiti | 4,19 | Hybrid regime |
110 | Ermenistan | 4,15 | Hybrid regime |
111 | Kırgızistan | 4,08 | Hybrid regime |
112 | Irak | 4,01 | Hybrid regime |
113 | Pakistan | 3,92 | Authoritarian regime |
113 | Ürdün | 3,92 | Authoritarian regime |
115 | Komor | 3,90 | Authoritarian regime |
115 | Fas | 3,90 | Authoritarian regime |
115 | Mısır | 3,90 | Authoritarian regime |
118 | Ruanda | 3,82 | Authoritarian regime |
119 | Burkina Faso | 3,72 | Authoritarian regime |
120 | Kazakistan | 3,62 | Authoritarian regime |
121 | Sierra Leone | 3,57 | Authoritarian regime |
122 | Nijer | 3,54 | Authoritarian regime |
123 | Bahreyn | 3,53 | Authoritarian regime |
124 | Küba | 3,52 | Authoritarian regime |
124 | Nijerya | 3,52 | Authoritarian regime |
126 | Nepal | 3,42 | Authoritarian regime |
127 | Fildişi Sahili | 3,38 | Authoritarian regime |
128 | Beyaz Rusya | 3,34 | Authoritarian regime |
129 | Azerbaycan | 3,31 | Authoritarian regime |
130 | Kamerun | 3,27 | Authoritarian regime |
131 | Resim:Flag of Congo.svgKongo | 3,19 | Authoritarian regime |
132 | Cezayir | 3,17 | Authoritarian regime |
133 | Moritanya | 3,12 | Authoritarian regime |
134 | Kuveyt | 3,09 | Authoritarian regime |
135 | Afganistan | 3,06 | Authoritarian regime |
135 | Tunus | 3,06 | Authoritarian regime |
137 | Yemen | 2,98 | Authoritarian regime |
138 | Çin | 2,97 | Authoritarian regime |
139 | Svaziland | 2,93 | Authoritarian regime |
139 | İran | 2,93 | Authoritarian regime |
141 | Sudan | 2,90 | Authoritarian regime |
142 | Katar | 2,78 | Authoritarian regime |
143 | Umman | 2,77 | Authoritarian regime |
144 | Resim:Flag of Democratic Republic of the Congo.svgDemokratik Kongo Cumhuriyeti | 2,76 | Authoritarian regime |
145 | Vietnam | 2,75 | Authoritarian regime |
146 | Gabon | 2,72 | Authoritarian regime |
147 | Bhutan | 2,62 | Authoritarian regime |
147 | Zimbabve | 2,62 | Authoritarian regime |
149 | Tacikistan | 2,45 | Authoritarian regime |
150 | Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri | 2,42 | Authoritarian regime |
151 | Angola | 2,41 | Authoritarian regime |
152 | Cibuti | 2,37 | Authoritarian regime |
153 | Suriye | 2,36 | Authoritarian regime |
154 | Eritre | 2,31 | Authoritarian regime |
155 | Laos | 2,10 | Authoritarian regime |
156 | Ekvator Ginesi | 2,09 | Authoritarian regime |
157 | Gine | 2,02 | Authoritarian regime |
158 | Gine Bissau | 2,00 | Authoritarian regime |
159 | Suudi Arabistan | 1,92 | Authoritarian regime |
160 | Özbekistan | 1,85 | Authoritarian regime |
161 | Libya | 1,84 | Authoritarian regime |
162 | Türkmenistan | 1,83 | Authoritarian regime |
163 | Myanmar | 1,77 | Authoritarian regime |
164 | Togo | 1,75 | Authoritarian regime |
165 | Çad | 1,65 | Authoritarian regime |
166 | Resim:Flag of Central African Republic.svgOrta Afrika Cumhuriyeti | 1,61 | Authoritarian regime |
167 | Kuzey Kore | 1,03 | Authoritarian regime |
[değiştir] References
[değiştir] Dış bağlantılar
- "The Economist Intelligence Unit's index of democracy" [1]