Talk:Venus tablet of Ammisaduqa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to astronomy. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
 |
This article falls within the scope of the ancient Near East WikiProject. Please participate by editing this article, and help us improve articles to good article standards, or visit the project page. |
[edit] "Venus tablets"
I have moved the following anonymously contributed unsourced assertions here. Can anyone make sense of this or provide some source? (Wetman 05:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC))
- The Venus tablets are a major date in all chronologies both biblical and pagan. First, you must postulate the concept that all chronologies once started from a doctrine of one Creation date of the world, not a different date per nation and culture. Then you must postulate that they feared the year 6000 or around it for an astral disaster. Our ancient past is so filled with these myths that we should not be opposed to start here. Whereas short Genesis chronologies place the tablet at Year 2400 plus 3600 more to the Year 6000, all long Genesis chronologies, and all pagan chronologies (presumed to have no biblical connection) use this tablet date as the year 3600 from Creation. This becomes lost and unnoticed because each nation has recalculated The Flood that created the new current world. The many Creation dates are all that of the Flood. Example: Mayan Flood is 3114 BC creating the world. But because they now predict that the current world will last 13 baktun (5200 tun), they presume all previous worlds to be of same length. And so that Flood becomes labeled as 13 baktun. The original prediction of 3744 haab (3796 tun) reveals its ancient connection to the Flood being (not 13 baktun) but 2256 years. However, the seasonal drift of the 365-day calendar stays in tact with the Venus tablet date May 1626 BC. As the Sothic is 720+720+20=1460 (leap days 180+180+5=365 days)so that many chronologies use 1440 as 360 leap days, so too the seasonal 744+744+20=1508 has 1488 years as 3114-1626 BC when Ammisaduqa died. The chronologies that place creation at 5500 BC whether the biblical Adam or pagan Creation do so by equating 1900 BC as the Year 3600 and as that tablet, and Venus date. The chronologies that place Creation at 5200 BC do so by regarding 1600 BC as 3600, the end of 300-year Babylon (1900-600 BC correctly 1894-1594 BC). (NOTE: Venus Dec 1625 BC minus 24 is Dec 1601 BC.) The Maya place it at Hamurabi's 1770 BC as Noah's year 1344 from that 3114 BC Creation by flood as being 2256 years to the Creation. In short Genesis comparison of the same data (2256 and 1344 and 3600), the Flood is Man's year 1656 so that the year 2256 is Venus in Noah's year 1200, and then only 144 years later the Venus Tablet of Noah's year 1344 is Man's year 2400. Babylon's 3600 is then a countdown calendar to year 6000. The rise of Venus as an 8-year cycle to July 1770 BC, Venus then drifts back to being a rise in May 1626 BC, (next rise 584 days later in Dec 1625 BC). This is Man's year 2400+3600 of which becomes reversed as Man's year 3600+2400. Venus as 1200 Egyptian years minus 60 days is equal to 1199 Julian and 5 days. The discovery was formulated as a half cycle being 600 egyptian years minus 30 days (subtract 2 days for every 40-year Venus). The 40-year cycle Moses used began in 1594 BC when Babylon ended (1894-1594 BC), but the world concluded the end of Babylon and end of Amizaduga to be the same year (correctly 1626 BC but mistaken as 1600 BC). Early Greeks and later christian Eusebius conclude the 300-year span of Babylon to be 1900-1600 BC as year 3600 because of the fall of 3rd dynasty Ur in 1900 BC. From this springs the debate of Man as 5500 BC or 5200 BC. And this in turn effected the myth of the Great Pyramid being a tower to survive the world's end disaster. The debate whether it was completed the year before the Flood, or started the year after the Flood (survived it or not) was altered to claim it was built 300 years before the Flood.
Anonymous IP User_talk:69.76.46.169 is convinced that his calendrical theories provide the Key to All Mythologies, but the amount of effort he's spent working them out does not translate into corresponding clarity of explanation... AnonMoos 19:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I am not having success at reformating the Venus dates i posted earlier (which are Fotheringham calculations (1929), in my current attempt to include the actual translated dates from Fotheringham and under them the formerly posted calculated dates. So with them in the HISTORY of this subject, perhaps someone can insert the proper carriage returns or text format so that others may see the variance between known text and known Venus calc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.144.96.249 (talk) 03:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
