User talk:ScaldingHotSoup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

• HAHAHAHAHA!!!! Mimz 03:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

• HAHAHAHAHA to you too. Ian 21:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

• Userboxes PWN...your mom. Mimz 01:14, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Testing... 1... 2... 3... Inhuman14 ^{( talk | contrib)}

Testing... 1... 2... 3... Inhuman14 .ιΙι.Talk.ιΙι.

I like the second one.

testing... Inhuman14 .ιΙι.Talk.ιΙι. 01:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeeha! My sig is good to go.

Wait! I found a better one!

--.ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.^{( talk | contrib)}

Contents 1 User talk:80.249.52.137 2 Sock Puppet 3 Nico Martin 4 Outland (Warcraft) 5 Welcome 6 Sig 7 Your autowarn edit 8 Smash Bros. character userbox 9 1920s 10 Problem with your autowarn templates 11 Don't revert without posting reasons why 12 On Tokyo 13 Congradulations!!! 14 Your recent edits - February 13th, 2007 15 Vandalism 16 Can you help me? 17 Warnwel 18 Vandalism 19 Substituting warning templates 20 Appology for bad article! 21 Regarding Vandalism (award) 22 WP:CVU status 23 Yokohama Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps 24 RC Patrol 25 Thanks 26 essay. ';,,;' 27 Welcome to VandalProof! 28 Edit Summaries 29 image speedy delete 30 thank you 31 Capella University and Spellmanloves67 32 note to home 33 Thanks +

[edit] User talk:80.249.52.137

Please don't put notices on people's talk pages saying they have been blocked unless you're actually responsible for the block. Use test templates like {{test2}} instead. Sam Vimes 12:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, how should I have done it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inhuman14 (talk • contribs)

As you did, except put a "test" template like the one linked to above. Then an administrator will come along and block if they deem the situation serious enough. Sam Vimes 21:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, ok, thanks! Now I know what to do. Ian 21:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sock Puppet

Hi, just a line about the sock puppet tag placed on your page- It was totally inapproprate and he is actually a banned user (User:Argol136). He's caused months of problems, and I'm currently documenting all of his behaviour for a much more widespread ban against him (which has been difficult due to his Dynamic IP allocation and multiple sock-puppets). He's targetted me many times (due to my zero tollerance stance I've took with him), so if you ever need any support, do please get in touch, and I'll add the offending evidence to my documentation. Thanks for reverting his changes, much appreciated. Jhamez 23:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC

--No probs, - Anytime! Keep up the good work! Jhamez 01:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

--Hi, I read the addition to the policy page. I think it is a very fair addition and most appropriate - hope it stays! Additonally, I'm quite envious of your signature! Is there a page on wiki that outlines how to alter your sig in such a way? Jhamez 14:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

--Thanks! ;) Jhamez84 15:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nico Martin

I altered the tag for db-band. It works either way, but your tag is more accurate. Thanks for noticing! Yanksox ^(talk) 02:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Outland (Warcraft)

Please do not re-add the instance information, it's pure speculation and has no place on Wikipedia, unless you add sources to the speculation. Havok (T/C/c) 13:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem, just remember to check what is removed and what is added next time. ;) Havok (T/C/c) 13:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

I use User:GeorgeMoney/Welcome. If you want to use it, you can't use it directly from the page, because my name is everywhere. Feel free to copy it into your userspace and modify it. Also, it is a modified version of Template:Welcomeg, if you want to modify that and make your own. Cheers! GeorgeMoney ^(talk) 01:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't need A Wikkipedia account —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.223.57.255 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sig

Hey I like your sig ; ) Thanks for your recent note on my talk page. I'm just getting around to responding. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 03:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your autowarn edit

I tried to see if there was a way to revert it back, to no avail. (I think there was a basic system change since it was created.) I've consulted with Adam1213 to see if it can be fixed. Thanks for letting me know. — ERcheck (talk) 04:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't think there is anything that you can do at this point. Adam1213 is looking into it. I appreciate the offer. I'll let you know if we discover something to roll it back that you can help with. — ERcheck (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Smash Bros. character userbox

{{User:Llama man/Userboxes/Smash Bros.|Roy}} should be changed to {{User:Llama man/Userboxes/Smash Bros.|Roy (Fire Emblem)|Roy}}, because the userbox's {{{1}}}|{{{2}}} indicator means that you have to type the name of the Wikipedia article referring to the character and then the name of the character. {{{1}}} means the Wikipedia article name, while {{{2}}} means the actual character name.

would become

[edit] 1920s

Hi. What was the purpose of this edit? It removed much material from the article without explanation; I therefore reverted it. An accident? If you think those sections should be removed from the article, please explain on the article talk page. -- Infrogmation 18:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Accidents happen. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 18:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Problem with your autowarn templates

Hi there. I noticed that the date is wrong on your autowarn template. It looks like you signed the templates when you created them and it was fixed to the date at the time you made the edits. I would recommend one of two things:

1. Use subst: inside an "includeonly" block on the CURRENTTIME variable and friends:

   {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTTIME}}, {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTDAY}} {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)

2. Or, use an "includeonly" trick on your sig:

   ~<includeonly>~</includeonly>~~

I believe either of these will end up with the correct current date/time being saved when you create the warning. The second option has the benefit of using your sig preferences at the time you create the warning. Mike Dillon 03:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Do you want me to fix this for you? It's pretty strange to see new warnings for users that say "July 2006". Mike Dillon 04:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Don't revert without posting reasons why

If you had bothered to look at the history of quasi-steady state cosmology, you would have noticed that a merge request to steady state theory had been up since January. This merge request has been satisfied. Just because an anon is doing work, don't assume that it deserves reversion. --71.57.90.96 16:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On Tokyo

Seems we both got it at the same time. :) — SheeEttin {T/C} 17:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Congradulations!!!

You are now recognized as a recipient of the Big Boss Award. Thank you for undoing the vandalism on my userpage. This is my way of showing thanks to dedicated wikipedians. Big Boss 0 20:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits - February 13th, 2007

The edit to list of Heroes graphic novels which you identified as vandalism...wasn't. Your overzealous warning was even worse, and completely uncalled for. Don't accuse users of vandalism because you don't like their edits. It makes the site look bad. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 21:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

On February 14, 2007, you warned my IP for editing "Joke" page, but I actually fixed it, it previously "ASDFGADFGADGFADFGAFGASF" over and over again in two parts of the page, and I removed them. I do not know if someone replaced it, but I removed it. Your warning, like above, was uncalled for. I may not be an expert in editing, but I know my removal of that combination of letters improved the article. ShinyWatchGuy

[edit] Vandalism

Thank you for fixing the vandal attack on my page. It is now semi protected. Big Boss 0 00:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Can you help me?

Hi, recently, there's been this really annoying guy on the Dr. Eggman article, who keeps on vadalizing it and saying that Ivo Robotnik is Eggman's real name, when it isn't. I've tried to talk to him on multiple occasions, and settle this issue, but he always completely ignores me. Could you tell me how I can ban him? 207.224.61.246 00:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warnwel

I made User:Inhuman14/warnwel suitable for transclusion, and replaced the copy on your userpage with a transcluded version (so you don't have to duplicate changes). Revert either if you wish. Λυδαcιτγ 02:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

You might want to consider using the set of welcome templates that The Transhumanist and I developed — the first six templates listed at Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome templates. However, the templates are made to be customizable with parameters, which might make things tricky with your system. Maybe you could have the template come up with preloaded options that can be filled in? Λυδαcιτγ 02:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Cool. And since the templates aren't (yet) widely used AFAIK, feel free to modify them if you need to. Λυδαcιτγ 02:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Whoops! Thanks for letting me know. I'll be more careful next time! --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 02:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Substituting warning templates

Hello, I noticed that you haven't been substituting templates. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you and happy editing. --_Hdt83 ^Chat 18:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Appology for bad article!

I am responsible for the article of Charlotta Eriksson that you called one of the worse articles you have ever red. I know my spelling is bad, as i am not native English speaking, and the article did not sound very neutral either, i suppose; but as regards to the praising, that was how she was seen, and that is how she is described in all of the reference books i have taken the information from. I have no problem with your judgement of the article; i know i am not an able writer, and as you can se on my page, that was in fact my last article on wikipedia, so i can now happily aknowledge that fact. I have no problem with the deletion of the article! My best wishes!--85.226.235.160 18:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding Vandalism (award)

Thank you! I am honored to get a barnstar other than a "You found my secret page!" =D —Signed by KoЯnfan71 ^{My Talk} _{Sign Here!} 00:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yokohama Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Yokohama Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. NeilN 16:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Ian Suzuki Mr. Ahrns AP History 17 December 2007 The Decision To Bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki “The bomb that fell on Hiroshima fell on America too. It fell on no city, no munition plants, no docks. It erased no church, vaporized no public buildings, reduced no man to his atomic elements. But it fell, it fell…” — Hermann Hagedorn. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not end World War II. Rather, it was the acknowledgement by the American government that Japan could keep its emperor. Though the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki quickened the end to war against Japan, the power of the bombs was used in place of the power of diplomacy against a nation that was already facing defeat. An understanding of the Japanese sense of honor and service at the time of World War II is paramount to achieving an understanding of why the Japanese did not surrender prior to the atomic bombings. Indoctrinated into every Japanese citizen and soldier was the honor of serving their Emperor, who was elevated to god-like status. In late July, the Potsdam Declaration was made to the Japanese government, demanding an only vaguely-defined unconditional surrender. The idea of unconditional surrender meant to the Japanese people that the Emperor, whom they had served for their entire lives, was to be dealt away with by the new government. Their devotion to the Emperor led kamikaze pilots to die for him, generals to commit suicide in failure, and soldiers to fight until the death. President Truman knew of this mindset, as he was informed by Under Secretary of State Joseph Grew, “The greatest obstacle to unconditional surrender by the Japanese is their belief that this would entail the destruction or permanent removal of the Emperor and the institution of the throne.” Secretary of War Henry Stimson also sent Truman a memo concerning the Potsdam Declaration stating, “I personally think that if in saying this we should add that we do not exclude a constitutional monarchy under her present dynasty, it would substantially add to the chances of acceptance”. However, President Truman, with vague ideas of ‘Unconditional Surrender’, did not include a clause for the Japanese people to retain their emperor in the Potsdam Declaration. The fear of the loss of the emperor and humiliation in defeat was strong enough that even after the bombings of both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Japanese Cabinet still could not achieve a consensus of surrender. Only the intervention of the Emperor could break the deadlock. The Emperor of Japan was believed to be a god, and did not take an active part in the politics of Japan. However, on August 14, the emperor intervened for the first and only time, which finally swung the hawks to agree to peace. By mid-1945, the Japanese capacity to wage war outside of Japan was crushed. Daily bombing raids had destroyed munition plants, oil storage, and The detonations at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as of August 2007, have killed over 300,000 Japanese civilians, with an average of 794 survivors, dying every year from radiation-related sicknesses since the year 2000.

[edit] RC Patrol

) Well, the same for me with people with faster connections - aka User:R & User:Astral :) What are you using? Personally Twinkle + Lupin's Antivandal filter usually worked very well for me. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page. I don't think it had ever been vandalised before! Cheers. - Shudde ^talk 23:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] essay. ';,,;'

Ian Suzuki Mr. Ahrns AP History 23 March 2008 Turning a Blind Eye: The Presidency of Ronald Reagan "You'd be surprised how much being a good actor pays off." – Ronald Reagan. Among conservatives, Ronald Reagan is one of the most revered presidents of all time. What did he actually do? Many conservatives will claim that Reagan single-handedly ended the Cold War, when it was Gorbachev’s reform policies that finally destroyed it. His “trickle-down” economic policies combined with wanton spending tripled the national debt to nearly 3 trillion dollars. Somehow, this ‘Teflon President’ managed to evade blame for any of the numerous scandals that occurred in his administration with the phrases, “I don’t remember” and “I didn’t know”. Ronald Reagan was a failure for the United States diplomatically, fiscally, and domestically, and was detrimental to the progress of America. In 1983, the Ronald Reagan made a tragic blunder by attempting to intervene in a Lebanese civil war. Various Christian, Muslim, and secular factions in Lebanon had been fighting for nearly a decade when The Great Communicator decided he would send a relatively small task force of US Marines to intervene on the Christians’ side. Muslim groups, including Hezbollah, responded violently, suicide bombing the United States’ Embassy, killing 63, and the American Marine Corps Barracks in Beirut, killing 241 Marines. Reagan also began supporting a terrorist group known as the Contras formed from the remnants of the dictatorial Somoza regime dedicated to the overthrow of the democratically elected, if leftist, Sandinista government. The public, naturally, was skeptical concerning this support, and then largely opposed to it upon the knowledge that the CIA was mining Nicaraguan waters. The Iran-Contra scandal involved selling arms to Iran in return for their pressure upon Hezbollah, the group that was responsible for the bombings in Lebanon and had captured American hostages. Reagan’s administration, having been denied congressional support in wake of the mining scandal, used the money to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. The public fallout was immense, but nothing the Teflon President couldn’t handle, claiming first that he didn’t know about it, then didn’t remember, and finally the truth. As stated by Senator John Glenn, “If he knew about it, then he has willfully broken the law; if he didn't know about it, then he is failing to do his job. After all, we expect the President to know about the foreign policy activities being run directly out of the White House.” Unfortunately for the United States, the arms sold to Iran then may have been killing Israeli civilians in Haifa last year (Hezbollah is largely armed by Iran), or soldiers in Iraq today. “A trillion dollars would be a stack of $1,000 bills 67 miles high” ¬¬– Ronald Reagan concerning the 1980 national debt. The Gipper initially had plans to balance the federal budget. However, once it became apparent that his policy of supply-side economics had failed, he gave up on that plan and tripled the national debt by increasing deficit spending and continuing to lower taxes for the wealthy. The ensuing 192.7 mile high stack of thousand dollar bills caused by Reagan’s explosion in red ink sabotaged the administration of his successor and took eight years of a budget-balancing president to overcome. The administration experienced the worst recession during the early years of his administration since 1914, prior to the Great Depression. While Reagan’s rampant spending did help the economy recover in the short term (in the study of economics, deficit spending encourages growth), severe economic debt discourages foreign backers to invest, which slows the economy and leads to stagnation. George H W Bush’s presidency was plagued by this national debt, and was forced to renege upon his campaign promise of “no new taxes”. "His errors glide past unchallenged. At one point...he alleged that almost half the population gets a free meal from the government each day. No one told him he was crazy. The general message of the American press is that, yes, while it is perfectly true that the emperor has no clothes, nudity is actually very acceptable this year."

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, ScaldingHotSoup! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.

Finally, I'd like to appologise for any delay, and wish you luck with VandalProof! Ale_Jrb^talk 19:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit Summaries

Hi. Please review Template:Summary these statistics. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] image speedy delete

Yes, there are image speedy deletion criteria, but, like for that hand-done sketch with the tank, the general speedy categories still apply to images. Nihiltres^{t.l} 04:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

There's a full list of all speedy deletion criteria at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Nihiltres^{t.l} 04:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC) (cross-posted)

[edit] thank you

Thank you for removing the vulgarity and vandalism on my user page. It's disturbing and frustrating but I thank you for quickly finding it. Bstone (talk) 19:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Capella University and Spellmanloves67

Dear ScaldingHotSoup, I noticed that you made a change on User talk:Spellmanloves67's talk page. I'm not sure why User talk:Spellmanloves67 is so angry but he seems to be on a vendetta to post non-relevant information about Capella University on many different topics. I've tried to talk but he seems very hostile. I've also noticed that he seems to have engaged in many personal attacks before and has been warned - you can see many of these warnings on his archived talk pages. How can I file for moderation? I really don't think that his edits are appropriate for the articles he is changing and that the distract from the topics. I especially think his edits on the WebCT and University of California, Irvine articles are innapporiate. Thank you for your help. Sxbrown (talk) 01:50, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I also note in relation to this topic that you recently told Spellmanloves67 that he or she can not delete warnings from his or her Talk page. That is not true. Please do not tell editors that. --ElKevbo (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Dear ScaldingHotSoup,

Thank you for your suggestions. It also appears as if User talk:Spellmanloves67 and another user 75.134.128.14 may be the same person. I'll see what I can do to follow your suggestions. Thanks for your help.Sxbrown (talk) 03:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you again. Another editor has just put a block on the WebCT article. Sxbrown (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

That was full protection by Administrator Luna Santin, not "a block".   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 11:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] note to home

Mr. Campbell's at 7:45 aM Thursday -- ScaldingHotSoup ^(talk) 17:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks +

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. I did notice a bit of a problem with your signature, in that the 'talk' part links to a page that doesn't exist (it goes to User talk:ScaldingHotsoup instead of User talk:ScaldingHotSoup). AlexiusHoratius (talk) 03:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)