User talk:Sasuke9031
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Re:Your recent edits
Cheers for the MOS heads up, although I beg to differ that the current edit is in fact "better" or a more accurate representation of the situation now. - Khanruey
[edit] Re:Itachi
I merged the article because Itachi himself did not deserve an article according to WP:FICT. Importance in the series or WP:ILIKEIT opinions are irrelevant in the fact that Itachi's article did not satisfy WP:FICT; ergo, his article should be merged. In any case, please read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA before posting such a message like that on my talk page, or I will simply revert it next time. With regards. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Seperoth with this one. -Tobi4242 21:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- I started the merge for the same reasons, twice.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 14:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New Legendary Sucker
lol, thats one iv never heard.--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 08:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Uchiha and Hyuga
My reason is simple, i like the Uchiha clan better but, i think that the Byakugan is cooler than the sharingan.Ultimaterasengan 19:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppet
You should ask the person accusing you. I wouldn't know. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry about all this mess. They are trying to accuse me of vandalising (I didn't do anything!). Tyar 00:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, but as you can see, they are accusing me of wrong. Any support in this "trial" will be appreciated. Tyar 01:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Also, Yusuke and Kuwabara (more of it if than the other two if you watch Yu Yu Hakusho) Tyar 18:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah... Tyar 21:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Help
That's something you should be asking YouTube, assuming that is what you meant by YT. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- I do not know. Wikipedia isn't a technical manual. Try Google. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Afd merges
From Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Society, "I still want to know why AfD is now the first step in merge discussions"
- Good question. I've always assumed it is because there is no Wikipedia:Articles for merge. It's a good way to force the people who monitor Afd to take action for you. -Verdatum (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Response
Yes, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, which is why I said he is dead. As of the last chapter Pein has said that Jiraiya, one of the Legendary Three, the Sannin is dead. Jiraiya himself said (to this effect: A good ending). While not using the word dead for obvious artistic vision of Kishimoto-san, as of right now he is dead until proven otherwise.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- You either ignored my point completely or unwittingly agreed with it. As I said, he is dead until proven otherwise. When Haku "killed" Sasuke, until proven otherwise he was dead. When Sasuke started moving again and started walking and becoming Naruto's resident Angst Boy, he was alive, thus proven alive. Until proven otherwise, Jiraiya is dead and underwater buried.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 22:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Kishimoto also confirmed that Jiraiya is dead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSaiyaMan (talk • contribs) 19:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Betacommand malfunction
Hmm...which images are you referring to? If it's the individual Squad photos stated in my Archive then I manually delete tagged those to correspond with the Non-Free Image policy. As of now I don't see any other's of mine that are gone which I'm not aware of. Fox816 (talk) 03:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Phishing
Did he now? Well my contributions page is the same as it was on the first, so he is probably using the signature data from the edit pages. He has done it before. Could you tell me what I should do here? Lastbetrayal (talk) 20:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Also could you show me where he did this? EDIT: Forget it, I see where he did it. Lastbetrayal (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Sounds like a plan. When I think of a way to word it I'll probably head to the ANI board. Lastbetrayal (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jiraiya age
The problem of the age is that we need to confirm it. Check the Naruto, Sasuke, Sakura and Kakashi articles and you will see there is no part 2 age. For the age we need a source and it will probably come with 3rd databook (if it comes). Regards. Tintor2 (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bleach character cleanup
I've started a discussion over cleanup of the Bleach characters here. Comments would be appreciated. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 03:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] That's the point, he didn't leave it in the air...
...unless EVERY single person I've seen this information from (I've also seen the *untranslated* transcription, hopefully someone will translate it) is lying. I'm not saying that that's not possible, but it's highly unlikely. It also doesn't change the fact that there is statement of death and witnessed confirmation. That alone is enough, right? Or does it have to be a character we LIKE? Come on. DestradoZero 07:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Seriously, wow.
Wikipedia supposedly strives to be a repository of knowledge, but you're saying that it's okay to deny access to true information because you claim that it's unverifiable? Do you even see the paradox there? This is one of the biggest reasons why people do not take Wikipedia seriously, and as of now I can't say that I blame them. DestradoZero 03:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Considering that the treshold for information on wikipedia is verifiability, not truth I would say he is absolutely correct in choosing to delete information that is not sourced. If you want the content included find sources. Taemyr (talk) 08:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Uh, Taemyr, were you addressing me or User:DestradoTensai? If you were addressing Destrado, please use his talk page to reply, as it gets very confusing. Sasuke9031 (talk) 09:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] List of Naruto characters revamp
See discussion here. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 07:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Merge complete. See discussion on stuff to do here. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merge discussion
See the discussion thread concerning the merging of Akatsuki (Naruto) here. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:this diff
I have reverted you. Since the question removed in the diff is a clear question about what the content of the article should be, poised in a manner that are not diruptive the removal of it was against Wikipedia:Talk#Editing comments. Per WP:BITE it's better to answer such questions as they come up. This has the advantage that the anon user in question can build an understanding of why the the content he was asking for was "missing". Taemyr (talk) 08:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] No need
I found it already. Go ahead and readd the line. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kuchiki Byakuya
Regarding my edit on Byakuya Kuchiki, your reason for the revert was 'We all know it's because he has a Hollow.', but I happen to be excluded from the 'we' you're talking about. Would you mind giving me a reference? And if it's true, what stops it from being put as a reason in the article? Azuka (talk) 23:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Naruto wikia
they archive our stuff...O-o --The Last Uchiha 07:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bleach cleanup
See this discussion. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:15, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
