Talk:Reverse graffiti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Graffiti, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to graffiti art, graffiti artists and all aspects of graffiti culture. Click Here for more information. |
[edit] Hoax?
According to User talk:Tjproechel, the creator of this article intends it to be a hoax and that "it still hasn't been spotted yet". However, I'm not sure about the accuracy of these comments, even though they were left by the author him/herself. Has anybody else been wondering about this? --Qmwne235 23:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Although I'm not very familiar with the term, reverse graffiti isn't a hoax - just try a Google search. Ali (t)(c) 03:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- This page is a hoax. The author admits it on Tjproechel's user talk. Tjproechel was the guy that made the Upper Peninsula War hoax.
Wish I had as much time on my hands as you, creating that page Upper_Peninsula_War looks so convincing. My page Reverse graffiti Still hasn't been spotted though.
People actually do "reverse graffiti," but I doubt the term is real, and the article probably has many falsities in it. SteveSims (talk) 04:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I have heard the term used (several times in fact around my town), but maybe it is because of the article. NathanD 016 (talk) 16:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Length of Sections
The article is very short with each "section" only a sentence so I have combined them in to one. 68.50.168.239 03:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] information
maybe it'd be worth talking about this article: http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2007/10/dirty-trick-cau.html . this page needs more information —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.221.143.13 (talk) 20:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
