Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CLW

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

[edit] CLW

final (30/0/0) ending 12:03 Wednesday 14 December 2005

CLW (talk · contribs) – CLW is a first rate user and editor - he is always on patrol and would make agreat Admin' - let's give him him his own mop and bucket! Kate's tool is broken at the moment - so can't report on his contributions numbers.:) Brookie: A collector of little round things 19:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I do indeed accept. I've only been around since July of this year, but according to Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits I'd made 8,000 main namespace edits last time the list was updated. (Not, of course, wishing to encourage editcountitis, and please note that many of these are minor edits...) Even if I'm not successful in being nominated for adminship, any feedback received via this process will be valuable. CLW 19:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Support

1. As nominator - of course! :) Brookie: A collector of little round things 19:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
2. Support looks fine to me.Gator (talk) 20:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
3. Support - seems me to have the right attitude. --ajn (talk) 20:50, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
4. Support --Aranda ⁵⁶ 20:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
5. Strong support - always appearing on my watchlist, doing great work. I may be getting confused but you're a Snicket enthusiast aren't you? --Celestianpower ^hablamé 21:18, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

   Yes indeed, 'tis the same me. I've been quiet on the Snicket front for a few weeks - I'd been holding off until I'd read The Penultimate Peril for fear of spoilers, but I finally read it this weekend and will no doubt be appearing at a watchlist near you more frequently once again! CLW 21:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

6. Support, unlikely to abuse administrator tools. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
7. Support clearly ready for a mop, and oh well, why not go the whole hog, a good big bucket too.--File Éireann 21:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
8. Oran e (t) (c) (e-mail) 21:58, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
9. Support Looks good! Lotta edit summaries, seems very civil, let's give 'em the mop! ;] --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS)} 22:16, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
10. Merovingian 00:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
11. Support will be good admin --rogerd 00:56, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
12. Support. —Kirill Lokshin 01:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
13. Support. I love that CLW uses lots of edit summaries.. --NormanEinstein 03:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
14. Support Looks fine to me.--MONGO 03:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
15. Support. Everything looks in place, good edits, good edit summaries, Would like to see a bit more User talk: when working on problems from others, but still Support! xaosflux ^T/_C 04:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
16. Support Answers to questions appear to be more than adequate I like the backlog comment that always looked like nasty work. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 04:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
17. Support. Good contributor. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
18. Support --pgk^(talk) 08:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
19. Support. I have seen him do a lot of good work and the answers below are also very good. Rje 11:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
20. Looks like a natural to me. ナイトスタリオン ✉ 14:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
21. Support. No big deal. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 18:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
22. Support - see him around often. Dlyons493 Talk 21:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
23. Support. Good choice! HowardBerry 18:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
24. Support good editor. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
25. Support - Gladly. Sango123 (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
26. Support Yes, definitely. Banes 06:34, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
27. Support per the nominator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:14, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
28. Support. El_C 04:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
29. Support, HGB 01:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC).
30. Support, Fabricationary 02:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

• Interiot's tool, available here, is a reasonable approximation of Kate's tool for use when Kate's is down.--Alhutch 21:46, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Using Interiot's tool, CLW has a total of 9476 edits. LordViD 23:49, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A. I've been frustrated by backlogs in the past - If I'm granted adminship, I'll be able to help with backlogs such as deletions. Although it doesn't take adminship to fight vandalism, being able to roll back vandalism will make things faster.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. Please see my userpage for details of articles I've started - I'm particularly pleased with the articles I've translated from other Wikipediæ, as this helps to address the current English Wikipedia inbalance towards subjects relating to the English-speaking world.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. I've been picked up on decisions I've made in the past (see my talk page) and have taken onboard the comments left by other users. I've dealt with any such "conflicts" constructively, eliciting replies from other parties such as "Tnx for the constructive response. I know it's hard to get every policy clear, and i guess that means we have to keep listening to each other. In fact, tnx for putting me in a position to put that into words again, by seeing it gracefully done."

I've also averted potential conflict. You'll see from my talk page that my first contact from Brookie was his concerns that I might have been stalking him. Our ongoing contact and rapport has led to this nomination!

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.