Talk:President of Iran

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

↓    Skip to table of contents    ↓

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the President of Iran article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	President of Iran is part of WikiProject Iran, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Iran-related topics. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's importance scale.
	After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

Contents 1 Male-Only Presidency 2 Vandalism 3 "In contrast with most republics [...]" 4 Head of Government 5 Iranian elections box 5.1 Request for comment (tag removed)

[edit] Male-Only Presidency

Only men are allowed to become presidents in Iran. Why was my addition deleted.

--Geoff on 28 of October 2005

Put it back in.--Zereshk 16:34, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

• He and she are the same in Farsi. However, I am certain that it is written in the laws of the Islamic Republic that women cannot become Presidents. I lived in Iran the 1990s and everybody said that there was a ban on female Presidency. This follows from the principle that female cannot become imams, which is another leadership position. Remember that Iran is a theocracy.

--66.81.192.235 00:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

It's actually stipulated in the constitution. The word "rejāl" is popularly interpreted as "men".--Zereshk 15:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

that is right. there has been a debate for a long time that resurfaces at every presidential election year that whether the word "rejal" was actually meant to be taken literally as "men" or not. although it seems the guardian council interprets it as "men" but they have never officially anounced it. for every election they accept and register female candidates but then they (the guardian council) dont' let them pass through the qualification stage.

• Plus, even though the Islamic people of Iran say that women can become physicians, lawyers, engineers, and so on, in practice most people don't expect women to go beyond high school. As far as I remember when I lived there more than a decade ago, the parents of women always worked energetically to sell their daughters to successful men. -- 03:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

women can and have become physicians, lawyers, engineers, and so on in Iran. Iran has a female vice president (vice president and head of enviromental protection organization) and there are also many female members of parliament. during Khatami's government, there was a female provincial governor and there are a few female mayors and hundreds of female city council members currently holding office in Iran. and about education, it has now been a few consecutive years that more female students (more than 50%) have entered universities than male students. All of this of course does not mean everything is well and ok for Iranian women, but nevertheless it proves your remarks are false.

• rstepp@sw.rr.com* Not so much false as mistaken...

• Iran's Vice President for Environmental Protection in 2006 is Fatemeh Javadi though she looks like a mullah protege with so much clothes that I wonder how she manages to walk up a few stairs without tripping. Nor can she push a small box across the table without getting strangled with the chador and scarves underneath secured in place with several safety pins. Honestly, what is with all this game?Patchouli 07:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Vince Mcmahon isnt the president of iran, someone fix that—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.11.11.247 (talk • contribs)

• "One of the officially recognized efforts for this process is to race against a elephant, the winner being one step closer to being accepted as a candidate." What the hell...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.35.4.130 (talk • contribs)

Please be bold and remove obvious vandalisms! see: Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages --Gerash77 20:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

While I am opposed to vandalism and encourage all individuals to remove it promptly...that made me chuckle. Vince McMahon...racing an elephant... Peter Deer (talk) 11:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "In contrast with most republics [...]"

"In contrast with most republics, the effective head of Iran's political establishment is not the president [...]" I consider this sentence quite problematic. I for one am living in a parliamentary republic in which the role of the president is more ceremonial than executive. Compared to that, the president of Iran holds immense power in his hands. I guess that the sentence was written by an American who had a presidential republic in his mind, unaware that there are many parliamentary republics around the world where the executive power of the president - either "de iure" or "de facto" - is very limited. --80.108.109.173 20:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• The issue with that is that is your personal preference. The fact of the matter is in most presidential governments the President is considered the de-facto Head of State. Frankly, I have more issue with the part at the top calling him the head of state, as it is established later in the article that he really isn't. Peter Deer (talk) 11:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Head of Government

I have issue with the accuracy of the term "Head of Government" at the top of the page, especially considering it is directly contradictory with the first paragraph of the article. I have no expertise on the government of Iran personally, so I would invite someone with greater knowledge on this issue to clarify this or to replace the statement with something more accurate. Peter Deer (talk) 11:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Iranian elections box

I've readded the {{Iranian elections}} box that's been removed a few times [1] [2] [3] and then readded by me. The reasoning of the editor that removed it is "no other template put a country's elections with the President. There is a separate section for this and it belongs in Elections in Iran". My reasoning is that it directly addresses the article as it has a list of "Iranian presidential elections". Another article that has an elections box in the presidents article is President of the United States which has {{Uspresidentialelections}} in it. I've invited the editor to this page to discuss it. Ha! (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

• See also: User_talk:Koov#President_of_Iran_.7B.7BIranian_elections.7D.7D_box

[edit] Request for comment (tag removed)

• Does {{Iranian elections}} a) belong in the article as per this edit [4] or b) not belong, as per this edit [5]

It seems clearly related. No substantial reason has been provided for not having it (what other articles do is a questionable basis, and has been shown to not be a uniform standard in any case). Hgilbert (talk) 16:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Hgilbert. The subjects are definietely related, so I don't see a reason to exclude it. Happyme22 (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)