User talk:Mangostar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] 1080 FAC
Are you the Harvard copyeditor?--CM (talk) 00:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] St. Vrains County, Jefferson Territory
Please see the Territory of Jefferson and Colorado counties. --Buaidh (talk) 18:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- We still have no external reference though... Mangostar (talk) 18:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD for "De Pietro"
Hello Mangostar. I noted that you nominated "De Pietro" for deletion. I think you should tell it to the creator of the article. I cannot say whether this article is a hoax or not. If there is no reference, the article should be deleted. Regards, Masterpiece2000 12:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 13:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:FLAG in EB article
Hi there. Which part of this guideline were you referring to? I can't see anything that discourages the use of flags in infoboxes. Tim Vickers 00:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ove Hoegh-Guldberg (biologist)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ove Hoegh-Guldberg (biologist), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://profiles.bacs.uq.edu.au/Ove.Hoegh-Guldberg.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Redirect of Indian attidudes toward Americans
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Indian attidudes toward Americans, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Indian attidudes toward Americans is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Indian attidudes toward Americans, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--Carabinieri (talk) 12:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
--Royalbroil 16:16, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: OK-NAB
PD-Self doesn't need a source, please do not re-add tag you wrongly placed there. Happy editing. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 21:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's a screenshot of a map with painted direction of crash site. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 09:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image problems?
What is the difference between the {{tl:PD-self}} and {{tl:GFDL-self}} licensing? One explicity states "GNU', but they both essaentially say the same thing. I created the picture and release it. Thanks. wbfergus Talk 13:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I have quite a few pictures on here (around 20-30), and I'd hate to have to go back and add a different if one was superceded by a newer one. I could really care less if anybody wants to cite me as the author or not. I guess some people need that extra attention, but I'm old enough now that I don't really care. wbfergus Talk 13:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unused images
Please stop tagging public domain images as speedy under the claim that they are only used in speedy pages. This claim only works if, once the page is speedied, that the image is covered by the CSD because it's unused. There is one a speedy criteria which refers to unused images, but only to images which don't have a free license. An image which is in the public domain doesn't become speedy-deletable just because it's unused. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FAR notifications
You haven't yet completed the notifications per the instructions at WP:FAR for Wikipedia:Featured article review/U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program. Please see the instruction #6 under "Nominating an article for FAR" at WP:FAR, and use {{subst:FARMessage|U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program}} to notify relevant WikiProjects and involved editors. Thanks ! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Grizzly_SierraMag_July2005.jpg
I've removed the non-free image from its article. It can be deleted immediately. I'm the uploader. Thanks for your work. User:Pedant (talk) 18:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Invitation to join WikiProject Plants
[edit] An image proposed for deletion
Hi, when you propose an image for deletion, remember to check if the image is in use. If it is, add The image above is proposed for deletion. See images and media for deletion to help reach a consensus on what to do. to the caption(s) in the article it is in use in, as it says in rule #1 in Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion#Listing images and media for deletion. Bib (talk) 19:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Images
I don't think any image on Wikipedia would "significantly harm the reader's ability to understand the article". You're blowing it grossly out of proportion. The image is there in order to identify two people; and, regardless of the importance of the event it documents, it is relevant to the article. In no way does it violate fair use. The picture helps the reader understand who the article's subject was on tour with and what he looked like at the time. It does nothing but enhance the quality of this article. NSR77 TC 03:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] US relations / POV tag
Per this conversation, can I ask why you are creating pages and immediately flagging them with POV tags? Pages on bilateral relations are indeed often helpful, but why create them out of material that you don't think is neutral? - Revolving Bugbear 21:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Help with US relations
Hey, i'd be willing to help wikilink the articles you're creating. I just wanted to let you know it'd do it to avoid an edit conflict after a good amount of work. If you're interested, of course. Grsz11 (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- That would be fabulous! I don't intend to do any wikilinking myself for some time (as it is this is pretty tedious but at least it's fun to make a bunch of pretty articles), though I may go back to may a change or two here and there (adding see alsos, etc). Hopefully we won't be getting any ECs but if we do all my edits should be small and easy to incorporate for you. Mangostar (talk) 05:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] == Agriculture in Chad ==
Yes, my bad for not noticing the assertation at the bottom of the page. But please note for future:
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Ros0709 (talk) 23:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Women in Ethiopia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Women in Ethiopia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/ethiopia/59.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] fishing article
Hi. Thanks for your work on this article. I haven't had a chance to review all the edits, but the article needed work. I might suggest that you do major editing in a word processing program or on your sandbox page rather than make a dozen changes to the "live" page just because it makes it easier to see what happened that way. Also, sometimes some folks hide vandalism in multiple edits, so when I see that many edits I start looking at the history to see if there is some reason.Bob98133 (talk) 21:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I prefer to make multiple edits (and I prefer that others do as well, within reason). That lets others look at my edit summaries for each change and see where content is coming from and where it is going, as well as why I made the changes I did. Feel free to make whatever changes to my version as you'd like. Mangostar (talk) 21:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Gender roles in Afghanistan
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gender roles in Afghanistan, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://womenshistory.about.com/library/ency/blwh_aghanistan_gender_roles.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Women in Bangladesh
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Women in Bangladesh, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/bangladesh/34.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Women in North Korea
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Women in North Korea, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/north-korea/35.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Women in South Korea
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Women in South Korea, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/south-korea/40.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Women in Turkey
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Women in Turkey, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/turkey/49.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Gender roles in Algeria
A tag has been placed on Gender roles in Algeria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakingSpirittalk 16:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Grand central station FPC
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I uploaded an edit that attempts to address the issues you raised with the photograph. It was a bit of a struggle to correct the distortion at all. I guess I feel like it would be hard for a better picture to be taken given where the building is. Anyway, a second look would be appreciated. Thanks -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 07:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Assassination of Benazir Bhutto FAC
Hello! I noticed you made many helpful edits to this article, which resulted in better sources and reference formats for the article. I just wanted to inform you that the article is now a FAC, and if you find that it meets the criteria, your expression of support would be appreciated. If not, then feedback for further improvement is welcome. Cheers! --Zaindy87 (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Photos
Hi. I saw the Markoff photo change, went to its Flickr link, found a couple images, and met you back at Hoffman. So sorry, and pretty funny in a way. I promise to stop but wanted to congratulate you on finding these images. They are high quality and your crops are excellent. -Susanlesch (talk) 03:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Style tribe
I'm not going on number of hits, I'm going on relevancy. See this Google search for example; out of those 10 pages, 3 sources at most use the term (most notable being NY times and the List), the rest being blogs or shopping magazines. I'd be happy to undelete if you think you can develop at least a higher-class stub from that. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 17:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- I know all of that; please don't assume I've got a case of the itchy delete finger. :) I was just concerned, as blogs tend to give rise to many terms which may gain usage in other blogs. That's why terms that originate from blogs need quite a bit more mainstream recognition before being considered notable, given the freeform nature of the "blogosphere". I'll undelete, in any case. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 17:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] under contruction tag
I agree with your recent removal of the under contruction tag from Royal Ballet School; but your note (... this should be used on an hourly basis) is a little bit hasty. The tag's own text reads, ... If this article has not been edited in several days please remove this template...., which was the case with Royal Ballet School. Robert Greer (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 2006 China-Kenya oil agreement
Hi. I've tagged 2006 China-Kenya oil agreement for speedy deletion as a copyvio. I know you're just splitting off the text from the main article. It looks like User:Patch77 took the material from here. -- Whpq (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good, I was suspicious myself and googled one phrase and didn't see anything... Thanks for being more thorough! :) Mangostar (talk) 18:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
The Geography Barnstar | ||
For resuscitating the article "Economy of Kenya", your efforts are greatly appreciated. Sunshard (talk) 07:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] DYK
--Maxim(talk) 01:25, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Agriculture in Madagascar
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Agriculture in Madagascar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wildmadagascar.org/overview/loc/36-agriculture.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Education in Azerbaijan
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Education in Azerbaijan, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.travel-images.com/az-univ.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Education in Bahrain
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Education in Bahrain, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/persian-gulf-states/35.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Education in Mongolia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Education in Mongolia, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/mongolia/49.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Education in Mongolia
A tag has been placed on Education in Mongolia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HamatoKameko (talk) 15:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Education in Laos
A tag has been placed on Education in Laos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HamatoKameko (talk) 15:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Education in Madagascar
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Education in Madagascar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wildmadagascar.org/overview/loc/30-education.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Women in Uganda
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Women in Uganda, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/uganda/34.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Compliment on changes to literacy and related pages
Hi, Mangostar. You've made some terrific changes to several articles related to reading and literacy. Thank you!
When you have nothing better to do, please take a look at all of the articles in the Reading navigation template. They could use an objective eye.
Best, Rosmoran (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Human trafficking
I have nominated the discussion page. Thank you. Mattisse (Talk) 00:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at[edit] Encyclopedic topics in obscure countries
HI I very much appreciate your work in creating these important missing articlres but do you think you could spend a minute or two cleaning one or two of them up. Creating a whole succession of articles intentionally with a wikify or clean up tag on them is lazy, particularly when they are copied public domain articles. This leaves a lot of other work for other editors later. Don't get me wrong your're doing excellent getting these off to a start but it would make things easier if you could wikify a few of them first ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 11:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Revised documentation for photo of The Shakespeare Center
I have uploaded a new, slightly larger, file of The Shakespeare Center, which you questioned. This is a photo which I created, and wish to share in the public domain.Weimar03 (talk) 21:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] About the photos you've questioned
Dear Mangostar: you have questioned a dozen or more photos on a Wiki site I developed (and for which I was given a "The Exceptional Newcomer Award For your work on the article Riverside Shakespeare Company. utcursch | talk 14:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC); the photos I have placed on the RSC site are ones that I myself took; posters that I made, all as graphics designer for this company. But I need your help: I don't know how to change the credit line on an existing photo, only how to load a new replacement photo. Can you explain this to me, to save me an inordinate amount of time on a Wiki site upon which I have spent countless hours of work? I would appreciate this. Weimar03 (talk) 02:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- As posted on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 April 15:
- If editors in good standing upload images as {{GFDL-self}}, we normally take it on trust that they are acting properly, unless there is evidence to the contrary (e.g. a history of uploading images improperly). It is out of order to suddenly jump to deletion, without any dialogue with the uploading editor, in order to give the editor a chance to resolve the situation satisfactorily. This image should definitely not be deleted until that has been done. This applies to the other images below similarly nominated.[1]
- Ty 13:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Mangostar, in your last email, you asked to have the theatre company email Wiki, but the Riverside Shakespeare Company (unfortunately!!) was disolved ten or more years ago, after 20 years of existance. I will, however, add the information that you requested, which will, hopefully, suffice. It's all for the sake of documenting this organization, which has no website, and therefore Wikipedia will be the first (and only legit) complete documentation of what the RSC of NYC did in its first decade when I worked there. Weimar03 (talk) 16:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear M, to anwser your questions: "Were you an employee of the theater when you created these images?" Yes, I was. and "Also, please add a note to any non-poster photos saying whether you took them or not." Yes, I did. And I own the negatives, etc. etc. Thanks, again, for your assistance on clarifying all of this. Weimar03 (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ps., I have, per your suggestion, added wording to the RSC/NYC site about the end of the last years of the company. Weimar03 (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC) Weimar03 (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've begun to add information about photos & posters on the RSC site. Let me know if you think it suffices.
- Dear M, respectfully, what you wrote in your last email is not true. I took the pictures for the RSC, made the posters, with my own funds, not the company's. At the time I was not compensated for any of this. I now own the negatives, the artwork. The company never copyrighted any of this. Weimar03 (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Let me add, to clarify the above statement, that McMullan owns the posters he designs for Lincoln Center Theatre, which pays him fee for their use. But they are his. Carol Rossigg and Martha Swope have a copywright on the photos they shoot for a theatre, which has a right to reproduce them but does not in fact own them. Such was the case with the posters I made, and the pictures I took for the RSC of NYC. When a theatre dissolves, the copywright does not belong to anyone, but the artists and photographers who worked there. If a set desginer designs a set for a theatre, its for that one use of the design for that particular show, and the copywright for that set design belongs to the designer, not the theatre; it cannot be used again by anyone but him or her. Etc. etc. Weimar03 (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear M, I'll do my best. Could not come a worse time: swamped for the next week in my present job. If you can petition the judge for a stay of execution, it would help. I and others spent quite a bit of time developing that site. Hate to see dozens of posters, flyers, etc. deleted. Hanks' rep contacted us with a compliment on the site. We corrected a lot of misinformation about his work at the RSC of NYC that's out on the web. What Wiki now has is the facts about his only NY work. Ah well...
Weimar03 (talk) 02:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Mangostar: After our various conversations (thank you, by the way) I have gone through the Wiki sites I have contributed material to and pulled, temporarily I hope, any material that contains graphic/photographic stuff that any others in the company have contributed to. As the prime photographer for the theatre company (yes, as a volunteer) during its first ten years, and, at this point, the primary contributor of material to these sites, I want the final material on the site to stay there, and that all the documenation is in place. I'll do my best to take care that it is. I'll get back to you on this. Weimar03 (talk) 10:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear M, I have gone through the site and carefully added wording which I believe addresses the issues and clarifies the status of the photos and the graphics that you questioned. I have referenced all of these to Weimar03 should there be any future question. All the best, Weimar03 (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- And thank you for your dilligence. I understand the why and the wherefore a bit better now. I think we're all working towards the same end: to make Wikipedia a better, ever more credible source of information. All the best, and let me know if there's more I can do. Weimar03 (talk) 15:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- And, while you're at it, check out a site I overhauled, about an important New York theatre: The Winter Garden Theatre (1850); hope you like it. Weimar03 (talk) 22:03, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear M, just wanted to know if I should be concerned about the notices on the photos of the site that you looked at, and if you'd had a chance to look at what I placed there to clarify the sources, etc. Just let me know if there's more that I need to do. Cheers! Weimar03 (talk) 11:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear M, thanks for removing the deletion box from the photos on Riverside Shakespeare. I notice that they're still on several posters on that site. Let me know if there's more I should do. Cheers! Weimar03 (talk) 21:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear M, Someone, not sure who, has also posted a "considered for deletion" on all or most of the posters I designed with photos I took, all on the Riverside site. I've documented these, just as I did the photos for which you removed the deletion boxes (again, thanks). Should I worry about these posters being removed, and never appearing on the Wiki site? Thanks for your help on this..Weimar03 (talk) 01:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Weimar03 (talk) 03:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] On "Baby Boy"
Hi Mangostar. Thanks for backing me up with your knowledge on legal matters. I was very dependent on news information. BTW, as much as possible, I would like to be consistent with ref tags, like {{Cite web}}, and dont know what type of template would Im going to use with the sources you add. Could you fix it for me? Thank you very much. --Efe (talk) 03:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. I will not change them. If you have more prose concerns about the article, please reflect them in the FAC page. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 03:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jacques-Édouard Alexis
I just noticed how Jacques-Édouard Alexis article was expanded and improved by you, thanks for the good work. -Kain Nihil (talk) 04:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ambiguity (law)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ambiguity (law), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Ambiguity. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Easter parade photos
Mango: Thanks for finding these pictures. It would be wonderful to find some of the Easter parade in its heyday. I have given up on WP images because of the hateful ways of those who like to take them down, but I'd possibly do some work to find a free image or two for this article. Do you have any suggestions on where to look for such things? Lou Sander (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Great stuff! I'm concerned about some idiot taking the photos down and complaining that there's not sufficient evidence that they are free images. Do you have advice on this? Lou Sander (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hey, thanks!
Thanks for your contribution! It's edits like this that really help out. Tan | 39 21:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- If this is sarcasm, I doubly stand by my edit--edit warring about incrementing the gmail counter means someone is taking things way too seriously. Mangostar (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Conclusion: Image placeholders centralized discussion
Hi. I'm sending this to you because you participated in the Centralized discussion on image placeholders that ended on 23 April.
That discussion must produce a conclusion.
We originally asked "Should the addition of this box [example right] be allowed? Does the placeholder system and graphic image need to be improved to satisfy policies and guidelines for inclusion? Is it appropriate to some kinds of biographies, but not to others?" (See introduction).
Conclusions to centralized discussions are either marked as 'policy', 'guideline', 'endorsed', 'rejected', 'no consensus', or 'no change' etc. We should now decide for this discussion.
Please read and approve or disapprove the section here: Conclusion --Kleinzach (talk) 11:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Please note this message conforms to WP:CANVASSING and has not been sent to anyone has not already participated in the centralized discussion.
[edit] School project move
Hi. I noticed that you moved the information on economic impacts from red-light district to prostitution in the Netherlands. I agree with the move, but just to let you know you left some references (not formatted) behind. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 05:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: reversions at friendship article
I'm sorry sir for my ignorance. I didn't mean to discriminate IP users, but sometimes mistakes are bound to happen. This happened while I was patrolling for recent edits. I'll be more careful in my actions next time. Sorry again. On my part I've removed the warnings which I left and replaced with a welcome note. Thanks for notifying and have a good day. S3000 ☎ 17:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand
Wondering why you haven't joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 09:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
With Cambodia User:Paxse and I looked for weeks to find some free images. I think a flickr agreement was made and somebody made contact with one of the those blogs and there isn't a problem. Most of them we found on a US aid site including the current image we have of the prime minister ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 10:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Thats great work you;ve done on Ratanakiri. I see you created Image:Ratanakiri districts.jpg. I was trying to obtain some district maps for many months, is it possible you could create district maps for the other provinces? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 10:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
What we need to do is add a commune and village table to all of the districts like I have done to Battambang District etc. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 10:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Well given that finding a decent amount of free images for Cambodia is a very difficult task particularly as the OTRS people in the commons take months to respond if you think removing these images helps wikipedia thats your problem. But as they aren't OTRS ticketed people will inevitably doubt them. In regards to Cambodian district maps anyhting is far better ythan we have at present (e.g nothing). ANy work you could also do on developing some of the district and other provincial articles would be gratefully appreciated ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 20:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wat Chon Thara Singhe
I put a speedy on it as it read like a travel guide and the text appears in a lot of travel guides. As you split it off from an existing article, do you know what the provenance of the text is? I don't want to delete material that should legitimately belong. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 12:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- The text was a copyvio text dump from May 3 from http://www.thai-tour.com/eng/narathiwat/attractions.html, not by Mangostar, but by another user. Accordingly, I have deleted the spliced article, and reverted the article it was spliced from to the version before the violating text was added.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Clearing your doubts
To prove that user:borndistinction is the representative of the Tourism Authority of Thailand, check the link for the endorsement letter by TAT [2]. TAT has sent an email to the wikimedia also.
To prove that the content for the Narathiwat Province from the external website is copyright of TAT, check the link [3], they've added the phrase "Courtesy of www.Tourismthailand.org"
Moreover, the content are also under the process of being uploaded on to the TAT's website as it hasn't been uploaded yet because the site is under improvement process. --Borndistinction (talk) 06:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Restore my deleted part
Please ask someone to restore my deleted content as i've provided all the proof and cleared all the doubts.--Borndistinction (talk) 02:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sinestro Corps War
Hi there! Just thought you'd like to know that the plot section has been significantly trimmed down as per the requests of many editors, yourself included. Your input on the FAC would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 01:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Theory of camouflage merge
I've removed the merger tag temporarily, since it's already been proposed that the existing camouflage article move to cryptic coloration. Once that's resolved, then a merger proposal can be done, but right now it's too confusing... scot (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] years
-
- Generally, it might be a good idea not to redirect or to afd additional articles until the test case at AfD, for 619 in Ireland, is dealt with by consensus. And even so, at present it seems to deal only with cases where there is no actual event in that year. It would be good to do a single test case for where there is one event in a year. And let it finish the undoubted Deletion Review if there is one before doing more. Doing a whole batch without prior consensus is not really the best way to do it--as the episodes and characters mess has shown. Go slow, and its more likely to last without drama. DGG (talk) 04:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Changes at 619 in Ireland
(from Sarah777 page) Please do not call obviously good-faith edits "vandalism"--it's insulting. Also, do not remove AFD tags from articles before the AFD discussion is complete. As an established editor, you should know as much. Mangostar (talk) 03:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Please don't delete 20 separate articles without any discussion. That is vandalism. Sarah777 (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- The entire content was preserved in the merge. Give me a break. Mangostar (talk) 00:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge? You deleted 20 articles (possibly more, I can't track everything). "Timeline" v "years in" has been debated in the past. Who appointed you as God? (I ask this with civility, of course). Sarah777 (talk) 00:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- They were all redirected and combined, I have no idea what you are talking about. Look through all the facts listed on the 7th century in Ireland page - every single thing from the year pages was kept in the bigger artilce. Mangostar (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Merge? You deleted 20 articles (possibly more, I can't track everything). "Timeline" v "years in" has been debated in the past. Who appointed you as God? (I ask this with civility, of course). Sarah777 (talk) 00:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- The entire content was preserved in the merge. Give me a break. Mangostar (talk) 00:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please don't delete 20 separate articles without any discussion. That is vandalism. Sarah777 (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:bot tagging error
Cheers.. Not much i can do about that - Its listed under the Category:Brazilian people, which im tagging for WPBrazil and WP BIO, as generally, they should be right. Probably just a handful of false positives such as this
—Reedy 15:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Uploading photos
Thanks for your explicit advice on using the highest possible resolution. The three low-res photos that I uploaded yesterday were indeed "resized" from hi-res originals as a kind of a trial. The upload went much faster, but I am not sure about the quality for other users. I will follow your advice in the future and will replace the three low-res pix with hi-res originals if I can figure out how to do this (always a problem for novices...). Thanks again. --Zlerman (talk) 02:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/619 in Ireland
Hi. In that AfD, you asked to be notified as soon as it closed, in order to proceed with merging the generic year articles. That solution would now seem to have consensus. Sandstein 22:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] thanks!
Hi Mangostar - thanks for the bilateral ties image for Indo-Bhutanese relations - I truly admire your work. Just so you know, I'm adding more work your way with Sino-Bangladeshi relations, Pakistan-Bangladeshi relations, Indo-Burmese relations, Indo-Iraqi relations and Indo-Sri Lankan relations. Again, thanks! Vishnava talk 18:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Mangostar - there is a problem with this map - it cuts out all of Northeast India from the colored map of India. I do think this is a significant problem which I request you to rectify. Regards, Vishnava talk 05:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Oh yeah :) in fact they are my principal sources for almost all I've done; I've extracted juicy bits adding history and political perspectives to foreign relations, so its an all-round resource really. Thanks - you do some wonderful work, btw. I hope to learn to make maps like you, a very useful skill. Thanks, Vishnava talk 05:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Protection tags on templates
Hey Mangostar. I saw you adding noinclude to a template that I protected recently. I didn't realize that adding a tag would cause it to be echoed onto the articles that include the template. Oops! What do you think about leaving off the semi-protection tag completely, for templates? What do people normally do? I assume that lots of templates must be protected anyway. EdJohnston (talk) 04:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Redirects
I don't think one large article is better 2-3 smaller ones. The smaller articles encourage people to contribute and all wiki readers to see that their isn't one type of religion in Zimbabwe (or any other country), that it differs as much as the Western countries most wiki readers come from. I agree that they have not been managed correctly, but that is not a good reason to simply merge them. Let us manage them better!--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 14:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Congratulations.
--gppande «talk» 08:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Refinement
User:Fritzpoll/Refinement - take a look and comment on its talk page, please Fritzpoll (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] got some work for you :)
Hi Mangostar - just wanna let you know that a fresh bunch of articles could use your excellent map-making skills: India-Republic of China relations, Pakistan-Turkey relations, Sino-Burmese relations, Sino-Bhutanese relations, Indo-Afghan relations, Sino-Nepalese relations, Nepal-Pakistan relations and Sino-Nepalese relations. Please have a look when its convenient, Vishnava talk 01:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- One more thing - is it possible to make a map just like the bilaterals, save it colors India and the Southeast Asia region for the India's "Look East" Policy article? Vishnava talk 01:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] warmest regards
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
For your prolific work on creating maps, DYKs, writing a GA and for helping me without hesitation Vishnava talk 13:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
Had a hard time picking what barnstar would suit - at least 4 would apply, so I just picked the "Surreal." Vishnava talk 13:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)