User talk:Madcynic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Madcynic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ghirla | talk 16:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Striking your vote
Hello Madcynic,
Thank you for your interest in the Wikimedia Board Election. The Election Committee regretfully informs you that your previous vote was received in error and will be struck according to the election rules, described below.
The Election Committee regretfully announces today that we will have to remove approximately 220 votes submitted. These votes were cast by people not entitled to vote. The election rules state that users must have at least 400 edits by June 1 to be eligible to vote.
The voter lists we sent to Software in the Public Interest (our third party election partner) initially were wrong, and one of your account was eventually included to our initial list. There was a bug in the edit counting program and the sent list contained every account with 201 or more edits, instead of 400 or more edits. So large numbers of people were qualified according to the software who shouldn't be. The bug has been fixed and an amended list was sent to SPI already.
Our first (and wrong) list contains 80,458 accounts as qualified. The proper number of qualified voters in the SPI list is now 52,750. As of the morning of July 4 (UTC), there are 2,773 unique voters and 220 people, including you, have voted who are not qualified based upon this identified error.
In accordance with voting regulations the Election Committee will strike those approximately 220 votes due to lack of voting eligibility. The list of struck votes is available at https://wikimedia.spi-inc.org/index.php/List_of_struck_votes.
We are aware of the possibility that some of the people affected may have other accounts with more than 400 edits, and hence may still be eligible to vote. We encourage you to consider voting again from another account, if you have one. If you have no other account eligible to vote, we hope you reach the criteria in the next Election, and expect to see your participation to the future Elections.
Your comments, questions or messages to the Committee would be appreciated, you can make them at m:Talk:Board elections/2007/en. Other language versions are available at m:Translation requests/Eleccom mail, 07-05.
Again, we would like to deeply apologize for any inconvenience.
Sincerely,
Kizu Naoko
Philippe
Jon Harald Søby
Newyorkbrad
Tim Starling
For Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee
[edit] Re: Regionalliga Nord template
Oops, forgot the part about your alphabetising the order. But you don't see three lines still at the end? - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nein. Hier. - Dudesleeper · Talk 19:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- I just realised that the problem can be avoided in Mozilla by decreasing the text size in the browser. It seems Mozilla's default font size is just that little bit larger than that of IE and Opera. - Dudesleeper · Talk 00:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Frauenfußball-Template
I have done a temporary edit so that there are no |s at the end of the lines when I view it, but these templates look different depending on the font size used by the person viewing it. So, I have been looking at other templates. Very few seem to use the nowrap editing option, presumably because of the variable font size. However, the German football team names look much better with nowrap. So, I propose using nowrap for all the team names. Also, very few use fixed line breaks, br, presumably for the same reason. Most of them seem to use • or · instead of |. I think they look better, but it would be very good if one could specify that the character used for separating articles in the list should not appear if they are at the end or beginning of a line. Also, I think the German football templates ought to have a common style. Have you had any further thoughts? Coyets 14:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Germany Invitation
|
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 02:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Regionalliga Nord
Hey Madcynic,
thanks for your message, I didn't even know about the clubs from Niedersachsen going to Regionalliga West, seems a bit of a wild one to me, they have always been in the Nord and it would isolate Bremen a bit. I will try to clarify the last map straight away, do you know how to align the maps horizontally rather then vertically, I think it would look better? Kind regards, EA210269 (talk) 12:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Well, thanks for letting me know, down here in Australia we don't get all that much on German football, only from the internet. But even when I used to live in Bavaria, Niedersachsen seemed a long way away, never been there!!! Can't see any of those clubs liking to have to move across to the West. Anyway, I have tried to make the maps a little clearer and I'm still working on the realignment. See you,EA210269 (talk) 12:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- I integrated the maps into the relevant parts of the aricle now, rather then having an extra section. I hope it makes the changes in league structure a little more obvious. If you got any reference about the Niedersachsen controversy, could you let me know? Might be worth adding, too. EA210269 (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- The Thüringen bit is a tricky one, as RW Erfurt and Carl Zeiss Jena both have played in the south for a while. Spfr. Siegen has done so too, being from Westfalen. It would start making the map pretty confusing, unless I color Thüringen altogether differently, maybe. EA210269 (talk) 13:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- I integrated the maps into the relevant parts of the aricle now, rather then having an extra section. I hope it makes the changes in league structure a little more obvious. If you got any reference about the Niedersachsen controversy, could you let me know? Might be worth adding, too. EA210269 (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, thanks for letting me know, down here in Australia we don't get all that much on German football, only from the internet. But even when I used to live in Bavaria, Niedersachsen seemed a long way away, never been there!!! Can't see any of those clubs liking to have to move across to the West. Anyway, I have tried to make the maps a little clearer and I'm still working on the realignment. See you,EA210269 (talk) 12:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] League System
Hey Madcynic,
I' m not sure which of the two league systems you are talking about but I assume its the 2008-09 one. Its a bit of a dilemma there because in the north, with the Oberliga Nord being abolished, the five Verbandsligas are parallel to the NOFV-Oberligas, below the Regionalliga. But they are still only Verbandsligas and I got a feeling, there will be one or two Oberligas pretty soon again, like there was with Oberliga Niedersachsen/Bremen and Hamburg/Schleswig-Holstein. It would make more sense and would also allow for direct promotion again. Anyway, not my call. Regarding the five Verbandsligas, I think I might just place a footnote and leave them where they are for now, if someone feels its completly wrong they will most certainly change it! Its just a bit of cut and copy. I have actually used those two tables in the German football league system article, have a look for an slightly updated version. In any case, if you wish, you can also write to me in German, I got a basic knowledge of that too, like most Bavarians. Have fun, EA210269 (talk) 03:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Forgot to ask, are you happy with the the new maps in the Regionalliga articles? My computer knowledge is somewhat limited, especially when it comes to the paint-program.EA210269 (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Aggreed, lets wait and see, I placed a footnote for now. I guess, the point could be taken to the discussion page of the article to give more people a say. Personally, it doesn't seem right to put, lets say, Verbandsliga Bremen on an equal level to the future Oberliga Nordrhein-Westfalen, not quite the same playing strength, without wanting to hurt Bremen to much!EA210269 (talk) 11:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Forgot to ask, are you happy with the the new maps in the Regionalliga articles? My computer knowledge is somewhat limited, especially when it comes to the paint-program.EA210269 (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Oberliga NOFV-Nord
A tag has been placed on Template:Oberliga NOFV-Nord requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] DDR-Liga and East German football league system
Thanks for fixing up the articles a bit, it didn't look like anybody had noticed them so far. That dot you removed may be the explanation why I had trouble with some flags in articles lately!!! Caused me a bit of a headache. Oh well, we are all still learning. Regarding the articles themselves, I had the feeling the old DDR leagues deserved a bit more then just being a footnote on the current German leagues. Being from the west however, I havn't got all the inside knowledge, I hope somebody who grew up with the DDR football can add a few more details. It's an interessting part of German sports history! Have fun and all the best,EA210269 (talk) 00:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- I created a template, among others, titled Template:East German football and tied it to the East German football articles. If you can see anyway it needs improving, let me know.EA210269 (talk) 08:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] East Germany
You're such a goof. CadenS (talk) 22:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reference
Yes, I noticed the German wikipedia doesn't believe in telling people where the information came from. I figured we better add a reference to the Regionalliga article to let people know why the 7th placed team qualified for the play-off spot and not number six. Thanks for letting me know, I didn't know about Heeslingen getting knocked back for a licence. Its a long way from Germany, here in Perth! Anyway, have fun, EA210269 (talk) 13:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
