Hensel's lemma
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, Hensel's lemma, named after Kurt Hensel, is a generic name for analogues for complete commutative rings (including p-adic fields in particular) of the Newton method for solving equations. Since p-adic analysis is in some ways simpler than real analysis, there are relatively neat criteria guaranteeing a root of a polynomial.
Contents |
[edit] First form
A version of the lemma for p-adic fields is as follows. Let f(x) be a polynomial with integer coefficients, k an integer not less than 2 and p a prime number. Suppose that r is a solution of the congruence
If then there is a unique integer t, 0 ≤ t ≤ p-1, such that
with t defined by
If, on the other hand, and in addition, then
for all integers t.
Also, if and then has no solution for any
[edit] Example
Suppose that p is an odd prime number and a is a quadratic residue modulo p relative prime to p. Then a has a square root in the ring of p-adic integers Zp. Indeed, let f(x)=x2-a, then its derivative is 2x, which is not zero modulo p for x not divisible by p (here we use that p is odd). By the assumption, the congruence
has a solution r1 not divisible by p. Starting from r1 and repeatedly applying Hensel's lemma, we construct a sequence of integers { ri } such that
This sequence has a limit, a p-adic integer r such that r2=a. In fact, r is a unique square root of a in Zp congruent to r1 modulo p. Conversely, if a is a complete square in Zp then it is a quadratic residue mod p. Note that the Quadratic reciprocity law allows one to easily test whether a is a quadratic residue mod p, thus we get a practical way to determine which p-adic numbers (for p odd) have an integral square root, and it can be easily extended to cover the case p=2.
To make the example more explicit, let us consider finding the "square root of 2" (the solution to x2 − 2 = 0) in the 7-adic integers. Modulo 7, we have a solution, namely 3 (we could also take 4), so r1 = 3. Hensel's lemma then allows us to find r2 as follows:
- f(r1) = 32 − 2 = 7
- f(r1) / p1 = 7 / 7 = 1
- f'(r1) = 2r1 = 6
- that is,
And sure enough, . We can then continue, and find r3 = 108 = 2137. Each time we carry out the calculation (that is, for each successive value of k or i), one more digit is added on the left to the base 7 numeral. In the 7-adic system, this sequence converges, and the limit is thus a square root of 2 in this field.
[edit] Generalizations
Suppose A is a commutative ring, complete with respect to an ideal , and let be a polynomial with coefficients in A. Then if a ∈ A is an "approximate root" of f in the sense that it satisfies
then there is an exact root b ∈ A of f "close to" a; that is,
- f(b) = 0
and
Further, if f ′(a) is not a zero-divisor then b is unique.
This result has been generalized to several variables by Nicolas Bourbaki as follows:
Theorem: Let A be a commutative ring, complete with respect to an ideal m⊂ A (which is equivalent to the fact that there is an absolute value on A so that for every x in m we have |x| is strictly less than 1 and the resulting metric space is complete), and a = (a1, …, an) ∈ An an approximate solution to a system of polynomials fi(x) ∈ A[x1, …, xn] in the sense that
- fi(a) ≡ 0 mod m
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n. Suppose that either det J(a) is a unit in A or that each fi(a) ∈ (det J(a))²m, where J(a) is the Jacobian matrix of a with respect to the fi. Then there is an exact solution b = (b1, …, bn) in the sense that
- fi(b) = 0
and furthermore this solution is "close to" a in the sense that
- bi ≡ ai mod m
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
[edit] Related concepts
Completeness of a ring is not a necessary condition for the ring to have the Henselian property: Goro Azumaya in 1950 defined a commutative local ring satisfying the Henselian property for the maximal ideal m to be a Henselian ring.
Masayoshi Nagata proved in the 1950s that for any commutative local ring A with maximal ideal m there always exists a smallest ring Ah containing A such that Ah is Henselian with respect to mAh. This Ah is called the Henselization of A. If A is noetherian, Ah will also be noetherian, and Ah is manifestly algebraic as it is constructed as a limit of étale neighbourhoods. This means that Ah is usually much smaller than the completion  while still retaining the Henselian property and remaining in the same category.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- Eisenbud, David (1995), Commutative algebra, vol. 150, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, MR1322960, ISBN 978-0-387-94268-1; 978-0-387-94269-8.
- Milne, J. G. (1980), Étale cohomology, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-08238-7.