User talk:Govvy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
| Archive1 (1 Feb 2006 - 15 May 2007)
Archive2 (16 May - 23 June 2007 ) |
[edit] June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] G Osbourne
You would need to contact the other delete votes, I can't withdraw the nom at the moment. Darrenhusted 14:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Films roll call
An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
 |
Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 6 - October 13 is Gregory Helms and WWF The Wrestling Classic. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 14.
You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list. |
[edit] WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
|
Hello! The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for October 14 - October 20 is Gregory Helms and WWF The Wrestling Classic. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, October 21.
You are receiving this notification because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you no longer wish to receive this notice, then please add your name to this list. |
[edit] Atari Task Force
Just letting you know about the Atari Task Force started up as part of the Wikipedia Video Games project. Your interest in the Lynx and revaming Lynx articles certainly falls under that scope. --Marty Goldberg 20:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Internationalrugby gen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Internationalrugby gen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Superkickoff.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Superkickoff.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Superkickoff.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Superkickoff.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Internationalrugby gen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Internationalrugby gen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Actually...
He has played 4 games and I'm not sure what you're on about... Please from now on, don't vandalize articles. I work hard to try to update player's caps and when silly little boys who don't do their research (like you) change it, I have to go back and do it all over again. м info (talk) 21:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Reply, 1, 2, 3, 4 games, all league matches, and all for Derby. Give it up... м info (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hey man, I'm sorry to get so grumpy with you, but please don't bust in on my wall and leave a supercilious comment in regards to an edit that, even if incorrect information, obviously wasn't intended to be vandalism; you know, good faith and all that jazz. I'm not sure if the comment was template or actually your words, but it was very irritating and haughty. Also make sure to double check facts especially when accusing someone of being wrong. I'm sure you're a cool guy just take it down a notch, ya know? Much love man. м info (talk) 05:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] THFC Early History
Hi, I see you as one of the active/creative editors on the THFC sites ( hope I have got that about right!) Anyway I have spent some time recently getting into the history of the club the really old stuff from 1882 to 1939 or so when updating the biogs of early players. (Sadly my knowledge before this only went back to around 1961 when i started supporting). Having looked at the Section - History of the Club up to the First League Title I was thinking it needs a bit of a spring clean for accuracy and omisions and addition of some references etc. I'm happy to have a go at this but don't want to tread on any toes and also want to make use of others knowledge and ideas on which books to refer to. For example, I am not sure what the view is on the accuracy of the T&E Weekly Herald short history ( "the Romance") and having not looked at the Wagstaff History of the club I'm not sure what this and other authors have included that could be used. Anyway, any thoughts you had on this suggestion including / other editors / books and other refs etc would be appreciated.Thanks Tmol42 (talk) 17:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Internationalrugby gen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Internationalrugby gen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tommy Forecast
It was deleted following an uncontested WP:PROD process, so there's no deletion discussion. --Angelo (talk) 10:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well, in this case give me some sources proving he has made some first team appearance in a fully professional league and I'll restore it. --Angelo (talk) 10:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding Tengen (company)
(repost, but wanted to bring it up to you personally too) They're listed due to creating unauthorized, unlicensed versions of games, some of which they had to take down (i.e. Tetris) and the fact the article in question mentions them in it. Basically the category covers any commercially-sold unauthorized, non-hack/-mode (basically, non-pirate) game related item or hardware that infringes on copyrights or patents, including games killed by C&D's (i.e. Munchkin (Videopac game)), and includes the unauthorized hardware clones like Nintendo, Atari and the Dreamcast got hit with.
It's a bit more distinction over unlicensed games, which really should have a category of its own, because unlicensed games don't all infringe on copyrights. Unauthorized video games would pretty much be a sub-cat to the unlicensed one. By making it include only commercial games it prevents fan-games from being shoved in there too.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Juggernaut (wrestler)
I had no idea that there was any discussion about the article a month ago. I would have been happy to fix it up then, and it was on my list of articles to fix up and expand. I will continue to work on this article, as he has bad a busy career and it will take some work to finish this off. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 17:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Superkickoff.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Superkickoff.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Web site
I went to your web site and it's pretty cool! DO you have any articles your working on that you would maybe need some help? Let me know :) SexySeaSquid 00:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Anthony Thomas (American footballer)
Hello, could you switch this article to Anthony Thomas (American football)? The term footballer refers to soccer players, while Anthony Thomas is an American football player. Thanks, Jwalte04 (talk) 16:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tottenham Hotspur cup final ribbons
I stand by my edit on this article as the way it was written previously was clearly suggesting that Tottenham started the tradition of placing ribbons on a trophy when I provided photographic proof, Notts County 1894 with cup adorned with ribbons, that this is not the case. I was very careful in how I worded the edit to advise the reader that while this was not the first time ribbons had been tied to the cup, it was the first time club coloured ribbons had been allowed to be tied to the cup prior to presentation and not added later at the club's celebratory dinner, as was the case every year from 1894. The article has since been reverted and in my opinion is once again misleading and suggests that Tottenham started this tradition when the evidence I presented clearly shows they did not. If I had chosen to be very picky I could have pointed out that ribbons were first tied to the handle of a trophy at presentation by Major Marindin before presenting the cup to Blackburn Olympic but these were not in club colours and was done purely to protect the handles from muddy hands as this was the first time the cup had been presented on the day of the game. Previously it had been presented at celebratory dinners. As a neutral, neither a Tottenham nor Notts County fan, I believe that the statement should be edited to state that this was not an original idea or the claim be removed from the page completely. Naturally when club pride comes into such situations it is always difficult but these pages are meant to be encyclopedic and when clear evidence is presented, should be edited accordingly.Captainbeecher (talk) 20:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
In response to your belief that it is a scarfe in the photograph I can assure you that they are ribbons and that if you ask this question of either an F A cup historian {which I happen to be (published)} or an historian of Notts County Football Club {I can put you in touch with a couple of well respected and published researchers of that club who regularly edit these pages} they will verify this. I can also provide photographs of Aston Villa {1897} with ribbons on the trophy, both team and individuals, and Nottingham Forest team group, again with ribbons. I would also refer you to page 11 of the Guiness record of the F A cup {second edition} {Mike Collett ISBN 0-85112-538-7} which also states that County were the first to tie ribbons to the cup. I am not wishing to enter into a game of oneupmanship or an argument. I merely wish to ensure that all statements relating to the F A cup within wikipedia are accurate and that popular misconception and myths are removed. Captainbeecher (talk) 20:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 2006-07 season
Hi, Just thought I would let you know after I took a look at the tottenham talk page, that I created the Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season 2006-07 page, thanks Prem4eva (talk) 22:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your request
Voilà:
'''John Gaburick''' is a [[Professional Wrestler]], who has trained many wrestlers, including some of [[WWE]]'s young talents in [[OVW]].
{{dated prod|concern =This article is about a {{{1|subject}}} that appears to lack sufficient [[WP:N|notability]] for inclusion.|month = July|day = 26|year = 2007|time = 13:16|timestamp = 20070726131659}}
<!-- Do not use the "dated prod" template directly; the above line is generated by "subst:prod-nn" -->
{{Uncategorized|date=July 2007}}
{{Prowrestling-bio-stub}}
