Talk:Foreign relations of the European Union
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject European Union, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, an attempt to provide information in a consistent format for articles about international organizations, diplomats, international meetings, and relations between states. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Total mess
There is a total mess with the EU external relations topics. The knot is mostly between ENP-SAp-EU AA-Third Country relations-Enlargement. Below is a sketch of how should the topics be sub-groupped (from the current EU official point of view). Currently the knot of 5-6 articles is made of combination of topics of different logical groups. I will try to do some re-arrangements so that the knot is broken and the articles follow the order shown below. Also, please add to this architecture below another topics that I have missed - or rearange if there is such need...
[edit] Third country relationships with the European Union (proposed list below)
The European Union third country relationships are dealt with trough different legal instuments, institutions and departments. Topics related to the Community (first pillar) agenda are dealt trough the European Commission - they relate mostly to economic issues, aid, etc. Topics related with the Common Foreign and Security Policy (second pillar), as well as some particulare issues in the Police and Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters (third pillar) agenda, are delat trough the European Council. Of course relations with some (most) states are in all these areas, so many of the EU policies listed below are jointly established by two ore more different EU departments.
- Common Foreign and Security Policy
- European Security and Defence Policy
- Sudan - Dafur mission
- DR Congo mission
- Moldova border mission
- Macedonia mission
- Bosnia mission
- Kosovo mission
- Foreign relations of the European Union
- European Union arms embargo on China
- Belarus and the European Union
- Myanmar and the European Union
- Cuba and the European Union
- European Security and Defence Policy
- European Community
- Directorate-General_for_Trade_(European_Commission)
- Third country economic relationships with the European Union
- Overseas Countries and Territories (special member state territories) (jointly with multiple other departments)
- European Economic Area
- Switzerland and the European Union
- Customs Unions with the European Union
- Eurozone
- European Union Association Agreements (FTAs) (jointly with DG external relations)
- Euro-Mediterranean free trade area (jointly with DG external relations)
- Economic Partnership Agreements with the ACP countries (jointly with DG external relations)
- European Common Aviation Area
- Third country economic relationships with the European Union
- Directorate-General_for_External_Relations_(European_Commission)
- European Neighbourhood Policy (jointly with CFSP)
- Northern Dimension (jointly with CFSP)
- Directorate-General_for_Enlargement_(European_Commission)
- Enlargement of the European Union (jointly with CFSP)
- Stabilization and Association Process (jointly with CFSP)
- European Energy Community
- Directorate-General_for_Development_(European_Commission)
- ECHO_(European_Commission)
- EuropeAid_Co-Operation_Office
- Directorate-General_for_Trade_(European_Commission)
- No leading department identifyied - jointly Community and CFSP: Euro-American relations + Transatlantic relations + United States of America and the European Union + USA and the European Union <-- merge/redirects needed -->
Another quesion is where to put such list as this? I think that Third country relationships with the European Union and Foreign relations of the European Union are the primary candidates, but currently the content of no one of them complies with the "root" topic needed for such a list. I see now why the European Constitution was trying to streamline external relations (Foreign minister post, etc.) :). Maybe we should move content from Third country relationships with the European Union to Third country economic relationships with the European Union (or similar meaning) and then put this root list there, explain there the pillar structure and the hardship from its dual-track approach to external matters.
Alinor 23:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC) Alinor 09:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The EU as a "Country"?
The following sentence from the article seems to imply that the EU is itself a country...Perhaps there is a better word to use since China is a country but the EU is not. European leaders, like others, have been courting the PRC since its economic rise, however due to its authoritarian nature and the Union's concern for Human Rights, relations between the two COUNTRIES are often double edged --CommonSense101 22:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Firstly what is a country? You can call Scotland or Britain a country for instance. If you are meaning just a sovereign state, see my argument which I am tired of repeating. But regardless, I'll rephrase it to a neutral term to keep people happy. - J Logan t/c: 08:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Benita Ferrero-Waldner with Viktor Yushchenko.jpg
Image:Benita Ferrero-Waldner with Viktor Yushchenko.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:EU China Summit.jpg
Image:EU China Summit.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:EuropeanUnionDiplomaticRelations.png
This image is wrong because Greenland is not part of the EU. --Gaúcho 12:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Barroso and Putin.jpg
Image:Barroso and Putin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Naming convention
We have a lot of pages like Ukraine and the European Union, the naming convention for such pages would be "Euro-Ukrainian relations". If no one objects I'm going to go and move the articles with these names. - J Logan t: 12:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- I object -- I prefer the "and the" style. I think "Euro-Ukrainian" looks pretty horrible. —Nightstallion 14:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well "Ukrainian-European Union Relations" or something. It is the standard for all bilateral pages (e.g.Anglo-American relations) and it is in the guideline from WP:IR. - J Logan t: 17:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- The important think is whether the term "euro-" is established in the same way that Austro, Franco and Anglo etc. is. I agree that "euro-" sounds somewhat cheap. ("Euro-swiss Relations" doesn't sound good) But at the same time it's 'classy' to have these things.
- Well "Ukrainian-European Union Relations" or something. It is the standard for all bilateral pages (e.g.Anglo-American relations) and it is in the guideline from WP:IR. - J Logan t: 17:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- We should also take into consideration what to do with EU almost-candidate countries. Ukraine is a semi-potential candidate. There is a constant debate in Norway whether or not to join the EU. Should there be a naming difference between European neighbours and countries further away? In terms of geographic domination it's more legitimate for the EU to call itself "Europe" than for the US to call itself "America". (But USA=America is more established) We've got an article called "Brazilian-American relations". Ukraine is part of Europe, and "euro-" indicates "Europe". My point is that there's many paradoxes. - S. Solberg J. 20:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- In regards to formal candidates and the SSA, we should stick with the current "Accession of" title, those outside such as Norway and Ukraine, I think we should use a normal convention as bilateral relations between a country next door and a country far away are still bilateral relations with no real expectation of enlargment any time soon. On Euro as Europe, well if we use a full "European Union" title to side step that but considering Europe doesn't have foreign relations I'm not sure how much that matters. - J Logan t: 15:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure it's a good idea to change this; I simply think European Union-Norway relations sounds *VERY* awkward, as do Euro-Norwegian relations or any other kind of formatting we could come up with. I consider the "Norway and the European Union" title a style of its own, and I see no added value in complying with style guides for articles on relations between countries for relations between a unique supranational organisation and countries -- see also China and the United Nations, Russia and the United Nations, ... for instance. —Nightstallion 21:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- In regards to formal candidates and the SSA, we should stick with the current "Accession of" title, those outside such as Norway and Ukraine, I think we should use a normal convention as bilateral relations between a country next door and a country far away are still bilateral relations with no real expectation of enlargment any time soon. On Euro as Europe, well if we use a full "European Union" title to side step that but considering Europe doesn't have foreign relations I'm not sure how much that matters. - J Logan t: 15:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Fair enough then. But on the point of "European Union-Norway relations", it would be "Norwegian-European Union relations" and the UN examples indicate membership, rather than an external relations. - J Logan t: 12:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Mh. I still think Norway and the European Union sounds more natural than Norwegian-European Union relations, don't you think? —Nightstallion 19:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Fair enough then. But on the point of "European Union-Norway relations", it would be "Norwegian-European Union relations" and the UN examples indicate membership, rather than an external relations. - J Logan t: 12:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
