User talk:Dream out loud

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5

1 Heathrow Plans
2 Re-releasing of U2 albums
3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kid_rock_mugshot_October_2007.jpg
4 WikiProject Films coordinator elections
5 Image:Facebook Logo.svg
6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PATH.svg
7 A recent nomination for deletion at AfD
8 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tube map thumbnail.png)
9 You're invited!
10 Orphaned non-free media (Image:ITunes Store screenshot.png)
11 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Meg Griffin.png)
12 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Last Train to Trancentral - EP.jpg)
13 Sorry
14 Image copyright problem with Image:Achtung Baby.png
15 Planning for the 7th Wikipedia Meetup
16 Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Joshua Tree.png)
17 Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Joshua Tree remastered.png)
18 Orphaned non-free media (Image:The King of Queens.png)
19 Juno GA nom
20 U2
21 Fair use rationale for Image:Breezeway.jpg
22 Deletion of sebuscabush.jpg
23 PopMart for GA
24 Image:The White Album.svg
25 Speedy deletion of Image:Continuum.png
26 Notability of The Lovely Ladies

[edit] Heathrow Plans

Hello There Dream Out Loud. I am extremely unhappy at the fact that you have gone and deleted the plans that I took about a whole hour of my life to do. Therefore, you have officially just wasted my life. Fair enough I did not put the source - I'll tell you now. I don't actually know some of the coding, so I'll have to have a look at some other company logos, and go from there. I made it by first looking on Google Earth. I print screened it and then traced over it. How can I represent THIS information in my actual image?

Thank you, and no thank you for that message. So bu-bye now. Get back to me ASAP please.

AMistry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amistry.mistry (talk • contribs) 19:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

First, don't accuse me of something that I didn't do. I'm just a regular user and I don't have the ability to delete images. I can only tag them for administrators to review them, and then they are the ones who delete them. Second, you need to always state the source of your images, or they'll eventually get deleted. If you created it yourself, then say that you created it yourself, and you can be your own source. This is important because images taken from other websites are not allowed on Wikipedia. Third, I tagged that image almost two months ago, which is a long time ago, and I'm really not concerned about an edit made in February during April, especially since I make many edits here everyday. –Dream out loud (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Well sorry. We're only human after all. I'll make those edits and see what I can do. Amistry.mistry (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re-releasing of U2 albums

Hi Dream out loud, there is a discussion on Talk:War (album) about whether to include information on the possible re-releasing of War, October, and Boy that you might be interested in. MelicansMatkin (talk) 18:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kid_rock_mugshot_October_2007.jpg

You tagged it for deletion. The source used to be here and then http://news.yahoo.com/photo/071022/photos_en/2007_10_21t233915_398x450_us_kidrock;_ylt=A9G_Rnj5OCNHHgoBNiHK.nQA well eventually web pages go.

But it is a mugshot so it qualifies as legit. William Ortiz (talk) 20:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I didn't tag the image for being illegitimate. I tagged it because it doesn't have a license. Is it copyrighted or in public domain? If it is in public domain, how do you know it is? Images are typically not in the public domain unless their sources specifically says so. This is why having an image license is important. –Dream out loud (talk) 03:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

When I uploaded it, the yahoo news article had not been deleted. The image's license is a mugshot. Mugshots are supposed to be public domain or something. I think mugshot is it's own license, but I am not sure. William Ortiz (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

An image cannot be its own license because the image itself does not state whether or not it is free. Not all mugshots are in public domain. If it was released prior to 1923, or if it was published by a U.S. federal government source, then it is in public domain. If it comes from a state or local government, or from somewhere else, then it may not be in public domain, so it must be copyrighted, unless the source states otherwise. –Dream out loud (talk) 15:13, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films coordinator elections

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 10:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Facebook Logo.svg

While the image of the Facebook logo is indeed a vector file composed of geometric shapes, the logo as a whole is definitely copyrighted. Just as the Google logo is formed of simple colored text, and the Microsoft logo is simply black letters, the logo is still fair use, not free use. CaseyPenk (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The Facebook logo is not copyrighted because, as stated in the template {{PD-textlogo}}, typefaces and words CANNOT be copyrighted. Same goes for Google's and Microsoft's logo. In fact, they are both uploaded to Commons, along with tons of other company logos which are also in public domain. Facebook's logo has been uploaded to Commons as well, and I don't see any reason why it would be deleted. See Commons:Category:Company logos. –Dream out loud (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PATH.svg

I'm concerned about the license you selected on this image because the website that the pdf that was extracted the logo from is copyrighted. (http://www.panynj.gov/disclaimerframe.htm) If anything this looks more like a Fair-use issue. — master son^{T - C} 04:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] A recent nomination for deletion at AfD

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust - Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust is very much a notable organisation in the region and the article itself asserts notability, is proportionally sourced, not promotional etcetera. Due to these factors, I've closed the AfD early and consensus was at AfD to keep it. Regards, Rudget . 12:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tube map thumbnail.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tube map thumbnail.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You're invited!

You're invited to the
Sixth Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
April 5, 2008
Time: 5:00 PM
Location: The Marathon Grill, 10th and Walnut

RSVP

(view/edit this template)

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:ITunes Store screenshot.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:ITunes Store screenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Meg Griffin.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Meg Griffin.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

I don't know the template for this offhand, but I removed the Family Guy logo from Family Guy. It has been deleted from FG articles before. See Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, particularly policy #8, for reasons why. Essentially, "decorative" images are not allowed. Most infobox images probably will be deleted sooner or later. Part of Wikipedia's mission is to develop the entire encyclopedia using free content, so the requirements are fairly strict. / edg ☺ ☭ 18:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Last Train to Trancentral - EP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Last Train to Trancentral - EP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Sorry

I didn't mean to revert your edit, that was a horrible accident, I misheard the data in the Anti-vandal tool and I though I was reverting the vandals edit. I'm sorry about this. MalwareSmarts (talk) 21:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

It's ok, I figured it was an accident. I just requested U2 for semi-protection so hopefully we won't need to be reverting vandalism anymore. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Achtung Baby.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Achtung Baby.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Planning for the 7th Wikipedia Meetup

The planning for the summer Philadelphia meetup has begun. We would appreciate your input.
You're getting this invitation because you're on Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list. BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Joshua Tree.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Joshua Tree.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Joshua Tree remastered.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Joshua Tree remastered.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:The King of Queens.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:The King of Queens.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Juno GA nom

Hey, I see you just nominated Juno for GA status -- and as one of the main contributors to the article I'd really appreciate it if you withdrew the nom, considering that you haven't really contributed to the article in the past, and considering that it just isn't up to scratch for GA yet. There are heaps of prose issues, lots of refs missing, the whole critical reception needs to be re-written, the lead needs a re-write and the plot needs polishing (well, all of the prose in fact). I was eventually hoping to get the article to GA but it really just isn't ready yet. Thanks :) —97198 talk 16:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that :D —97198 talk 16:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] U2

Hello there. I just got your message. I will answer properly later tonight re collabs, etc, except to say that the U23D article is looking excellent. I’m now in deep mourning having just found out that U23D’s run at my “local IMAX” finished just last night – I thought it was next week. Well, I got to see it twice last month, and meant to see it again – it will never be on again. I’ve been to 7 U2 concerts since 1989, and the film was just as good – different to live, but just as good. The sound quality was brilliant. --Merbabu (talk) 04:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

What a difference 24 hours makes - the local IMAX have just decided to run it late on Fri, Sat, Sun nights for the next few weeks. Woo hoo - at least one more time for me then.

As for wikipedia, I haven't yet had a chance to review U2 3D in detail, but it as a look of quality about it. But, in the meantime try looking at this. I recommend spending some time on it. It was very helpful for me getting Indonesia and U2 to FA. I'd say work on U2 3D for the time being, then head to Popmart (I can probably assist on that one). Ie, work on what interests you, but don't get too close to it as it blinds one to the value in the criticisms/reviews of others. Ie, during FAs, recommendations that I initially hated within a day or two seemed excellent! Ie, sleep on criticisms. As for U2 articles, if I could spend time on them, my priorities would be Zoo TV, The Joshua Tree, and Achtung Baby (in that order but reversed!) But, there is a pile of Indonesian history articles I want to sort out too (see History of Indonesia - the 20th century stuff mainly), and also I started this and want to see it go to FA.

Anyway, the main point of my ramble is to recommend you work on that Guide (not that I'm commenting in anyway on your writing - I'd recommend it to anyone). It is by no means gospel - for example, sometimes the word "also" is actually helpful.--Merbabu (talk) 00:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey – why not send it to peer review now? Input from other non U2 editors would be good – although often peer review gets a limited response. But just try. In fact, why not even put it up for GA as well - now? Although I think it actually has a good chance of getting GA straight away, don’t be afraid of it being rejected - this might be your best result as the editor should provide good and workable improvement recommendations. If not, you can ask. That’s what the article needs. And, both peer review and GA often have time lags, so get it up soon is my suggestion, but up to you. --Merbabu (talk) 00:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Another review from the Sydney Morning Herald for your response section. This is the more serious of the two main local papers in Sydney. Goes over two pages - it's a strong review. --Merbabu (talk) 03:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Breezeway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Breezeway.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of sebuscabush.jpg

Which are your arguments for suggestiong deletion of Sebuscabush.jpg?--ometzit<col> (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PopMart for GA

I think it would be a good idea to mention the costumes that the band wore. The bodybuilder spandex shirts, Bono's introduction in a boxing robe, the Edge dressing like a Village People biker, etc. I think this is a key part of understanding the pop culture element of the tour that the band was trying to explore. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 04:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:The White Album.svg

Image deletion warning

Image:The White Album.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Template:Idw/lang

Balabiot 14:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Continuum.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Continuum.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rockfang (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of The Lovely Ladies

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Lovely Ladies, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Lovely Ladies seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Lovely Ladies, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.