Talk:Chicago Bulls
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Click [show] for further details |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
[edit] Ben Gordon a Brit?
Now I don't know much about the nationality thing and how it's officially defined. But Ben Gordon grew up in America(Mount Vernon New York); I don't see how his nationality is British. 75.21.89.187 06:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- He actually has dual citizenship, according to a Sports Illustrated article that ran a few weeks ago. Zagalejo 06:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
And why does that make him British and not American? He grew up here and lives here. 75.21.89.187 06:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- If you have to choose one or the other, I agree, American would probably be better. Zagalejo 15:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- He is a British citizen. He has British citizenship. It is not that hard to have dual citizenship. You cannot deny this because it is a fact. Leave it as is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TyrusThomas4lyf (talk • contribs) 06:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC).
- If you have to choose one or the other, I agree, American would probably be better. Zagalejo 15:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Random Facts
I added this section and added one fact/ If anyone else can add something the the random facts section it might help.
[edit] Section titles
Someone split the 2004-05 and 2005-06 seasons into separate sections. Should each season get its own section? I think it would be more efficient to leave them combined, using sections to identify eras of the team that were clearly different. And despite Curry's absence, these were fairly similar teams. Gorilla Jones 13:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Heh, I don't know bout that, Curry's usual 10 points in the first qtr sure made a difference in my eyes. :) KOS | talk 22:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] POV tweak
Saying Jordan and Pippen are certain to be hall of famers is a bit POV. Corrected to "most fans expect," which while equally uncited, at least puts the anticipation in the name of fans rather than wiki. --JKPrivett 06:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
You have a point with Pippen, but it's fair to say that Jordan is a lock to make the Hall of Fame. 24.15.198.73 03:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Every single player on the 50 Greatest Players in NBA History list that's eligible is in. They're both mortal locks. Quadzilla99 12:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Are you kidding? Every sportswriter and every fan in his right mind knows they're locks.--208.102.189.190 (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dabullz.net
How significant is the forum at http://www.dabullz.net? Are they established as the biggest unofficial fan forum of the Bulls, or are they just using our site for free advertising (which goes against the guidelines at Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Spam? --Idont Havaname (Talk) 21:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I would say you're right to remove it. Gorilla Jones 02:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Too much freaking information
The space allotted to the two past seasons on this page is about the same as the space that covers the 1991-1998 period, which beyond being longer is far more significant to telling the history of the Chicago Bulls. I suggest merging Return to the playoffs and The offseason and the 2005-06 season, while making the entire section smaller and easier to read.
Opinions?
-- gavindow 00:43, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- I had suggested that above but never actually did it. I agree. The notes on JR Smith and Howard Eisley, for example, are irrelevant to this article.Gorilla Jones 03:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'd have to disagree. "The signing of Wallace allowed the Bulls to trade Tyson Chandler, the last remaining player of the Krause era, to the New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets for veteran power forward P.J. Brown and salary cap space that was used to sign former Bulls co-captain and gritty perimeter defender Adrian Griffin." That is true to a certain extent but not wholly accurate. That information is slightly misleading. The trade for P.J. Brown is not what freed up the cap space. It was the trade for Brown and J.R. Smith that allowed it to happen. Smith was traded to Denver for Eisley's non-guaranteed contract. That is what freed up the cap space. While I agree that J.R. Smith and Howard Eisley are not notable to the bulls and do not merit too much written about them, that entire trade situation should be mentioned. KOS | talk 13:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- I actually am working on a re-written article over at User:Gavindow/Chicago_Bulls. It's a work in progress at the moment, but you're welcome to hop on over and add any suggestions. When I'm done, I'll let people know on this page. -- gavindow 06:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
It's not too much information. I'd like it if some information was added on the Luvabulls, Bulls Kidz, Swingin Seniors, Bucket Boys and the Bulls Big man dance squad the Chicago Matadors. BigBoi29
[edit] Recent Draft Selections
I removed Luol Deng from the Recent NBA draft picks section because he was drafted by the Suns and traded to the Bulls on draft night.
- I think this section would be more useful if it included the actual outcomes of those draft picks. Technically, the Bulls drafted Aldridge and Carney this year, but neither played a minute for them or was ever intended to. That wasn't an accident or a change of plan. For example, wasn't the Bulls' 1987 draft meaningful for a little more than the selection of Olden Polynice? Gorilla Jones 12:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
perhaps a section of Significant Trades would be appropriate. as of now the pippen trade is mentioned in the history section as it occurred during the 'jordan era' Mwhope 21:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notable Players
We should come to some kind of consensus about who qualifies as a Notable Player. Right now, we basically have everyone from the two three-peat teams, Elton Brand (for winning ROY as a Bull) and a smattering of guys from the 70s. The list is too long. (Perdue, Wennington, Buechler, etc..no love for Jack Haley?) I'd like to codify the rules as follows...
1. Was notable for their achievements as a Bull (not as a member of another team); 2. As a Bull, did one or more of the following - was an All-Star, won a major award (like ROY), set a major record, hit a game-winning shot in a playoff game, was a starter and/or a long-time contributor on a championship or near-championship team.
That would mean our Notable Players are B.J. Armstrong (ehhh), Boerwinkle (maybe), Boozer, Brand, Cartwright, Corzine (maybe), Gilmore, Horace, Harper, Kerr, Kukoc, Oakley, Love, Paxson, Rodman, Sloan, Theus, Van Lier and Walker. (Obviously MJ and Pip are in the Hall of Fame section.) Anyone see any notable exclusions? Bear in mind that's about the same number that the Lakers have. Gorilla Jones 12:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image needed
A photo of Kirk Hinrich of the Chicago Bulls is needed to replace the promo photo in the infobox. Are there any locals who could manage to do this for the wiki? Thanks.--Alf melmac 12:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Who on earth is John Tuck ?
I may be english and not a massive fan of the NBA but even I know the section titled "The 90s Dynasty Part II - Return of Tuck and another three-peat" should be about the return of Jordan and not this mystical player called John Tuck ??
Please either sort this out or correct me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.84.58.140 (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
- Someone has vandalized the page. I reverted the John Tuck stuff, because it's total nonsense. Zagalejo 22:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Greatest Uniform.
"The Bulls have always had the greatest uniforms compared to other teams"
According to who!?
Either provide a source, or delete what appears to be simply opinion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.208.239.141 (talk) 14:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Time for truncation?
When I added the rivalries section, I noticed how large this article is. Is it time to shorten this article by creating new articles for specific large sections? If so, which sections should be shortened and have new articles created? Perhaps the History section could use some shortening.
DaDoc540 03:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Noah is French.
Noah is officialy a French player since last month, so the flag next his name should be a French flag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.140.123.111 (talk) 09:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Season by Season pages
I noticed that the pages for individual Bulls seasons don't really have much written in them and are basically just listings of standings and rosters, etc. Is this by design, or have people just not gotten around to adding writing to them? I ask because this seems to be a departure from what's done in the pages for individual seasons of baseball teams that I've seen. At any rate, does anyone care if I add text to the pages that I feel I can add text to? This might also be a way to keep the page shorter as suggested 2 posts above this one. GambitRF (talk) 22:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- People haven't gotten around to adding text on the seasons pages. Add as much as you can. Sloclops 06:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Season by Season records
Why is there a whole listing of the season by season records in the main page AND in its own page? It is redundant and one of them needs to go. I originally created its own page so the length of the main Bulls page wouldn't be so long and truncated the season by season results on the main page to the past 5 seasons like some other sports pages I have seen. Anyone have any thoughts on this matter? Sloclops 06:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Depth chart
I agree, just get rid of it. It requires too much original analysis. Zagalejo^^^ 01:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Depth Chart should be removed
It was suggested by "KnowledgeOfSelf" that i discuss this in the chat. I believe that depth charts are very arbitrary. Players are often substitued in for positions other than those listed in the depth chart as well as in different orders. It is for this reason that i believe they serve no purpose on wikipedia. With your help, we can eliminate all the depth charts on wikipedia! Who's with me!
I guess Zagalejo is with me. I didnt see that before. Thank you.—Preceding unsigned comment added by No compassion (talk • contribs)
[edit] My recent edits
I would like to know your guys' thoughts. I recently edited the entire top section of the article. Which I think is a lot better. I also added the uniform pictures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasesboys (talk • contribs) 06:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I was also thinking about going more in-depth on the individual championship seasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasesboys (talk • contribs) 06:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
