Charlie Townsend
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article does not cite any references or sources. (December 2007) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
 England (Eng) |
||
 |
||
| Batting style | Left-handed batsman (LHB) | |
| Bowling type | Leg Break | |
| Tests | First-class | |
| Matches | 2 | 199 |
| Runs scored | 51 | 9,512 |
| Batting average | 17.00 | 30.29 |
| 100s/50s | 0/0 | 21/40 |
| Top score | 38 | 224* |
| Balls bowled | {{{test balls}}} | {{{FC balls}}} |
| Wickets | 3 | 725 |
| Bowling average | 25.00 | 23.11 |
| 5 wickets in innings | 0 | 68 |
| 10 wickets in match | 0 | 18 |
| Best bowling | 3/50 | 9/48 |
| Catches/stumpings | 0/0 | 193/0 |
|
Test debut: 15 June 1899 |
||
Charles Lucas Townsend, born November 7, 1876, Bristol and died October 17, 1958, Stockton-on-Tees, Durham, England, was a Gloucestershire cricketer of the 1890s. Though unheard of by most cricket-lover today, for natural all-round ability Townsend could certainly bear comparison with the famous Gloucestershire trio of Grace, Jessop and Hammond. However, it is fair to say Townsed lacked the commitment to cricket required for the sustained success of those players, and his batting and bowling ability almost never came off fully in the one match.
Townsend first emerged as a leg break bowler from Clifton College at the age of 16 in 1893. He took 21 wickets in four games and showed, despite his very slight build, the ability to get through a lot of bowling and spin the ball prodigiously from leg. In one innings against Middlesex, he bowled 70 five-ball overs (equivalent to 58 six-ball overs). The following year, Townsend's record was modest though Grace gave him a good deal of bowling on soft pitches, and he was seen as not physically strong enough for county cricket by most critics of the day.
It was in 1895 that the sensation of Townsend's career occurred. Schoolwork meant he played only one match up to the 21 July - taking only two wickets for 94 - yet in Gloucestershire's remaining 11 matches he took 122 wickets. With increased physical strength, Townsend spun the ball so much on the treacherous pitches upon which almost all these games were played that, though he was often freely hit, even the best batsmen inevitably succumbed to viciously turning balls. Townsend's dominance was such that he bowled over 95 percent of Gloucestershire's overs from one end during these matches!
The fact that Townsend was never tested on good pitches during his amazing spell in 1895 was considered insignificant at the time. However, during May, June and July 1896, when the weather was consistently dry and pitches very true, Townsend proved extremely ineffective. Though when the rain finally came he took 38 wickets in the last four matches, it was clear he was an easy bowler to play on firm pitches. The following year, Townsend's bowling was expensive even on the few rain-affected pitches because he was sacrificing accuracy to gain spin, but his batting developed so much that he attained the status of an all-rounder, scoring a maiden century against Yorkshire and winning a critical match against Nottinghamshire. Townsend was classically stylish, left-handed batsman, who was able to hit well despite his slender build. His off-side strokes were particularly effective, and his driving allowed him to score at a consistent pace throughout his major innings.
In 1898, Townsend bowled with deadly effect on a sticky wicket at Lord's to win the opening match against Middlesex, and, though on the hard pitches his bowling was utterly harmless, his skill as a batsman reached far beyond that of previous years and he hit five excellent centuries - the highest being 159 against Lancashire. When the rain returned in August, he lost his batting, but his bowling was - remarkably - even more irresistible than in 1895. In five matches, he obtained the following analyses:
- v Kent at Cheltenham: 275 balls; 15 maidens; 13 wickets for 92 runs.
- v Warwickshire at Cheltenham: 389 balls: 12 maidens; 15 wickets for 205 runs.
- v Essex at Clifton College Close Ground: 336 balls; 15 maidens; 15 wickets for 141 runs.
- v Somerset at Taunton: 201 balls; 6 maidens; 12 wickets for 117 runs.
- v Surrey at Clifton College Close Ground: 332 balls; 17 maidens; 9 wickets for 160 runs.
- Total for five matches: 1533 balls; 65 maidens; 64 wickets for 715 runs (average 11.17 runs per wicket).
Townsend was rewarded for his splendid all-round feats with selection as a Wisden Cricketer of the Year, and his jump to the front rank of batsmen continued in the dry summer of 1899, when he made nine centuries, including a brilliant 224 against Essex. Although his bowling had become very expensive even when the pitches helped him, Townsend was chosen for his only Tests against Australia. He did very modestly in these matches, but toured America with a team led by K.S. Ranjitsinhji that winter. In 1900, though he only took 57 first-class wickets, Townsend again batted very well despite playing no really large innings, showing greater ability than before to counter the spinning ball on treacherous pitches, notably late in the season at Cheltenham.
However, from 1901 Townsend began devoting most of the summer to studying law and later practising as a solicitor. This meant that he could only play a handful of matches each season until 1906. Though he hardly bowled at all in these games, if anything his batting skill had increased, as shown by his 147 on a fairly difficult pitch against Sussex in 1902 and a brilliant 214 against Worcestershire in 1906. From 1907 he was appointed as Official Receiver at Stockton and could play only exceptionally rarely (though he would have played in the Cheltenham festival in 1908 but for a strain). Innings of 61 against a formidable Yorkshire attack in his only appearance for 1907, 126 against the Australians in 1909 and an astonishing 84 (after Gloucestershire at been dismissed for a record low 22 in their first innings) to beat Somerset in 1920 showed him to be much ahead in class of other Gloucestershire batsmen even when out of practice. His last appearances in 1921 and 1922 yielded little success, and he was never involved in the game after that.
