User talk:Bentheadvocate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] This Is Benjamin Hartaub
IF YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS ABSOLUTELY HAS TO INTRUDE UPON MINE, LEAVE ME A MESSAGE:
[edit] Message Archives
[edit] Messages
BETA BETA BETA
BETA BETA BETA
BETA BETA BETA 03:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)BETA 05:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
BETA
[edit] Suicide Note
I feel that I have done nothing wrong on this issue. I appreciate the feedback, but my mind has not been changed. As far as I'm concerned, this issue is closed.
Warning: due to the subject closure as stated above, any new messages on this issue may be deleted outright, will not garner a response, and may not be archived.
Thank You. --- BETA 05:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Lead of Book of Genesis
This seems like a small matter of semantics, but I was wondering why you objected to the use of the word "mythological" in the intro to the article. That's how it was originally, and it's really not much different than "theoretical". In fact, the term myth actually fits this to a tee. A myth isn't necessarily incorrect. It's simply a story regarding the origins of the world. Only in popular culture has it come to mean something that's not factual in any way. I'll wait for your response before taking any action. --clpo13(talk) 04:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Edits being challenged
Recent edits to the article Woodrow Wilson are being challenged because they lack specific references to a reliable source. Please comment at Talk:Woodrow Wilson and establish consensus there BEFORE re-adding the edits. If there are sources for the information you are trying to add, please provide them on the talk page so that other editors may examine them for their reliability. Thank you. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Question for you
Hi. Sorry to bother you, but I just want a bit of clarification on this statement, if you don't mind. I believe that SirFozzie should take a chill pill. This has gotten very out of hand. [1]
Just wondering what it was that you've seen me do that would indicate that I need to chill out? While I've been admittedly frosty towards Mantanmoreland due to past times the two of us have butted heads, but I don't think I've done anything to deserve that comment. But if I've been over the top, please let me know exactly, so I can correct it. SirFozzie (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Austria at the Time of National Socialism
I read your message to Barbara Shack on the article about Austria at the time of national socialism, and that you asked for reference. The point is that she and I are working on the translation from German into English, If you could explain to me how we should provide reference in such a case that would be great! anyway as translating as such takes up already a lot of time and if you look at the German article we are far from done, I am sure neither I nor her had really time to provide reference so far. --VeronikaMM (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Warning - inappropriate edit.
This was wholy uncalled for. Do not repeat such conduct. PouponOnToast (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia is a project under construction
Don't remove "red links" for the sole reason that an article does not currently exist. Only do so if you can make an informed determination that it is a subject for which Wikipedia should never have an article and if the article existed it should be deleted. Wikipedia is not complete; it is an ongoing project. -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
