From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
|
[edit] Ashecliffe
Boston Globe says that the title of the film is Ashecliffe. Requesting a move. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Move complete. Any questions, let me know. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
It seems that more recent news is still referring to the film as "Shutter Island." I don't know if Ashecliffe is still the working title.--Skywarp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.115.125.36 (talk) 00:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I know, it's kind of confusing. If people go to Shutter Island, though, they can be led here. Also, Shutter Island (film) redirects here. How about we stick with this title for now until we can verify from the filmmakers themselves what the title will be? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
The Hollywood Reporter is referring to it as Shutter Island 25 Feb and 26 Feb -- SteveCrook (talk) 22:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Google News Search shows that Ashecliffe is used, too. I think that it would be preferable to stick with Ashecliffe because normally, films would take their names from their source materials. This is a highlighted exception, not at all a rumor. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- To update about this, all the March, April, and May headlines about this film being produced in Massachusetts has titled it Ashecliffe. This is pretty much the film title barring any changes down the road. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)