Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksej heinze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 02:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Aleksej heinze

Aleksej heinze (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod, reason was "notability - fails wp:academic". Autobiography whose prod tag was removed without explanation by author/subject. --Finngall ^talk 20:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete An active but junior academic with no apparent claims to notability yet. GoogleScholar produces only a few hits and Google Books nothing at all. He seems to have gotten his PhD in 2005, based on one of the items in his publication list which appears to be his thesis. He still has a web page where he is listed as a PhD student[1] Does not satisfy WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

*Delete Agree per Nsk92. He may be notable someday but not today.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 00:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

editor blocked indef as a sockpuppet by Casliber per [2] DGG (talk) 06:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

• I was just about to speedy per CSD:A7 but the list of publications is, I suppose, a rather tenuous assertion of notability. Delete. Stifle (talk) 14:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

*Delete Per nom.Divinediscourse (talk) 18:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

editor blocked indef as a sockpuppet by Casliber per [3] DGG (talk) 06:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

• Strong Delete. Just a spammy resume. Qworty (talk) 23:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not yet a significant academic. DGG (talk) 07:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per our PROF test. Eusebeus (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.