User talk:Belovedfreak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

Archive 1 - November 2006 - 2 March 2007 Archive 2 - 7 March 2007 - 2 July 2007 Archive 3 - 2 July 2007 - 2 October 2007 Archive 4 - 2 October 2007 - 1 November 2007 Archive 5 - 13 November 2007 - 30 January 2008 Archive 6 - 1 February 2008 - 4 April 2008 Disputed fair use messages

[edit] Thank you...

...for your kind support of me as a coordinator! I look forward to helping WikiProject Films move forward. Hope you have been doing well! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 11 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jacqueline Audry, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--DaughterofSun (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Film/Did you know

Not sure if I already mentioned it, but thank you for the updates you do here, as well as your article contributions in this area. Cirt (talk) 12:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Nah, you're doing fine. Cirt (talk) 12:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adopt me please.

Hey, i guess i want you to adopt me. Would that be cool? StephenHjellum13 21:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RFA thanks

Thanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence § t/e 18:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] adoption

definately interested in being "adopted", thank you - dealing with family crisis at the moment so very limited time. But will get back to you soon. thanks again. Rosabibi--Rosabibi (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 14 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Julia Glover, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bookworm857158367 (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Raz Adoti

Hi Belovedfreak,

Hope you're well.

I've created Raz Adoti's page; you'll see that he's notable. I was wondering whether you could reformat the references to include the footnotes, and to basically oversee the page for improvements (contents box, external links etc).

Thanks,

Have a good week,

Best,

Tegan Summer (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA...

[edit] Peer review for Mulholland Dr.

Hi there, and thanks again. I appreciate (really!) taking apart the article. I think it's funny because I get all huffy at first, then I calm down and change it, and it's usually is a lot better. I can't ever seem to skip the huffy step, though. I appreciate your input. Anything else you can think of that needs changing, please suggest away. --Moni3 (talk) 12:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Razaaq Adoti

Hi,

Thanks for the edits and comments on Razaaq Adoti; this attempt was easier :).

Have a great week,

Best

Tegan Summer (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Samuel Ameobi

Hi. :) I just wanted to let you know that I have removed the speedy tag from this article to let the AfD play out. The reason I've done so is that there seem to be serious notability concerns about this individual. My removal of this tag isn't meant to disagree that the article has insufficient content, but was done because of the specific larger concerns in this issue and my belief that settling that question may be of more value than a quick deletion in this case. If this article is deleted as "no content" and recreated with sufficient content, a new AfD would have to be launched to determine notability. If the AfD closes as it looks likely to at this point, the article will be protected against recreation by WP:CSD#G4 until and unless notability can be properly established. I think allowing the AfD to proceed may ultimately save Wikipedia time. If you want to talk about my reasoning, please feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 17 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ursula Kemp, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Cirt (talk) 11:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] page redirects

hello. i was wondering if there was a clever and efficient way of determining any redirects on a given page without clicking through every one? --emerson7 22:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

yes is an example. after gathering all the names into an article or template like this one, is there a way to determine if the good links (not the redlinks) point to dabs or redirects without manually checking each. --emerson7 22:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

thank you so very much....that's exactly what i've been seeking. cheers! --emerson7 23:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Laramie Project

There is nothing wrong with them having their own articles. But, the articles were just stubs ...and have been for a long time. Until someone takes the time to work on them, I believe they are best served merged into an omnibus article. If you want to make them B-class or better on their own, OK. But, it is easier to maintain if they are all together. And, easier to fight off an AfD. My Wiki-philosophy is mergist: merge stubs into a central article until some one can spend the time and effort to expand. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 17:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Just a note, the entire content of the previous separate articles were copied into the omnibus article. Nothing has been lost or deleted. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MDMA

No thanks. It was badly worded in a way that required a citation; I worded in a way that it did not. I'm an experienced Wikipeadian, please and thanks. Scientz (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Granted. I stand by my claim, and offer the plea that there will be no "reliable" (i.e., "published" sources) that detail the unpleasant, nasal passage ripping effects of insufflating MDMA. The bottom line is, as much as "original research" is a valid guideline, sometimes common sense must be employed for the purposes of completeness. There are three choices here, as I see it. 1) Simply leave the "citation needed" tag there ad infinitum as there will never be a published source detailing these effects; 2) accept the OR-tinged personal experience of a someone who has on several occasions insufflated both cocaine and MDMA (cocaine having no unpleasant effects on the sinuses, MDMA feeling like inhaling powdered glass); or 3) remove the section altogether in favor of better wording. As an inclusionist, I prefer choice 2, and such, I have reverted my edit. Scientz (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky

[edit] Rfa thanks

Thanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 04:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Tanzania/In the news/Wikinews

Kinds sparse, w/ some really older entries. We'd always love more contributors about Tanzania at Wikinews, if you're interested. Cirt (talk) 12:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Let me know if you need any help/advice. Cirt (talk) 12:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Special Award

		The Special Barnstar
		I hereby award The Special Barnstar to you for your great contributions to the first half of WikiProject Biography Spring 2008 Assessment Drive. Keep doing well in second half of it. :) Solar-Poseidon 22:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Joseph Gatt

Hi Beloved Freak,

I think I messed up the references on Joseph Gatt.

Can you take a quick look and see where I went wrong please? I attempted to format them with the written foootnotes (your preferred style).

Thanks

Tegan Summer (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter

The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gatt

Hi there, I see CactusWriter beat me to it. Glad to see you're carrying on creating new articles!

Thanks anyway! :)

Have a great weekend. Tegan Summer (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user

There is currently a backlog of 57 users at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user. Please consider offering adoption to one or more of these users. Don't forget to change their {{adoptme}} template to {{adoptoffer|Belovedfreak}}. Thank you for your continued participating in Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. xenocidic (talk) 19:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Watermelon Woman

On 2 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Watermelon Woman, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 10:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ADOPTION!

I'm interested in being adopted. You seem like a smart, all-around good Wikipedian, and I want to know if you'd like to adopt me! Thanks! Connorflanagan (talk) 13:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] deleted

I added a delete temple to the article without realising that it was already deleted by another user. It is sometimes hard to tell when I use Twinkle! (Anti-Vandal Tool)--Megapen (talk) 19:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:AndTheBandPlayedOnFilm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AndTheBandPlayedOnFilm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yennenga

On 9 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yennenga, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 02:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Safi Faye

On 13 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Safi Faye, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 15:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WBOSITG's RfA

[edit] Jeremy Andrews (Scientz) User Page

Do not EVER, under ANY circumstances, touch my user page again. Scientz (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

It's my opinion that this has become a personal grudge with you because of my edits to MDMA (in which, I notice, my edit appears to have "won") . . . Grow up. I (or my user page) would not have even come to your attention were it not for my edits on MDMA. My user page has been like that for well over a year without any other Wikipedian taking offense or needlessly editing it. My user page does not violate Wiki protocols (I've read them twice now). Most telling, in fact, is the sentence in "What may I not have on my user page?" that reads: "The Wikipedia community is generally tolerant and offers fairly wide latitude in applying these guidelines to regular participants." If this is the case, where is your tolerance? To me, your attempts to edit my user page are transparent, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop hiding behind Wiki protocols that do not say what you claim they say. If you want to discuss edits I've made to the general content pages, fine . . . that is what Wiki is here for. If you want to continue this asinine edit war over my user page, then I shall stand by my claim that you are being unnecessarily immature. Stop. I'm done speaking to you about this topic. Scientz (talk) 17:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm curious how you have arrived at the judgment that that material appears without their consent . . . have you spoken with my father, mother, or grandparents? Also, your own quote only refers to "unsourced or poorly sourced material", so how did you interpret your edit as falling within those guidelines? Last time I checked, the birth dates on Wiki did not have a footnote. If your interpretation is indeed correct, then I'd better start putting "citation required" tags on several hundred thousand birth dates. So which is it I'm violating again? Just leave the page alone. Scientz (talk) 18:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

In fact I am not, although your suggestion has been duly noted. Scientz (talk) 18:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Congratulations!

On 15 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nitrate Kisses, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 08:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 5/16 DYK

On 16 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kaddu Beykat, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 04:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] adoption

hi there - I'm back - are you still able to adopt me? I've just made some edits to Ishmael Beah's page - an entry that has attracted controversy in the past (see history and discussion). So I would appreciate your advice if those issues re-occur. Leaving aside the question of bias, which is always going to be a subjective judgement, I think that the page as it stood was factually misleading in a couple of places. Oops as you can see I am also crap at formatting, this message appeared in the wrong place - I'm sorry!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosabibi (talk • contribs) 18:57, 16 May 2008

Thanks for your advice. No, I don't want to get into edit wars, so I'm glad for you thoughts on how to avoid that.

It isn't just the content of the entry that bothered me, but the fact that changes were being made at the instigation of the publisher, who by several media accounts has been extremely high-handed over the whole issue.

What is the deal about sources? There was talk on the discussion page about needing "secondary sources", which just seems weird to me and I can't find anything in the guidelines that seems to validate it. I've always been taught to value primary sources, and I really couldn't see the point of referencing media coverage that was basically just reporting on the original reports. I've included some material from the Village voice article because it did include some new interviews etc. But still no extra on the ground reporting.Oops, forgot to sign again. And what is the formatting thing that makes lines appear in that box thing, and how do I get rid of it?--Rosabibi (talk) 16:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Me again. Thank you for your time and for your interest. I fixed the title and added a couple of catagories (after much messing around) but I still couldn't get the references to show up - I'm a bear of very little brain on technical things. I'll take another look when I have more energy and am feeling more alert. I know a lot about nineteenth century women travel writers, however. And not many of them have wikipedia pages, so I'll add some more entries, as well as adding more to the Sophia Lane Poole entry. Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosabibi (talk • contribs) 12:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Done! although I should go back and put in more complete reference details - but that will have to wait til morning. Yawn. Thank you!--Rosabibi (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Congrats!

On 23 May 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cagn, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New Focus at Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for your continued work and assistance on Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles, referencing and generally cleaning up articles that have needed attention for a long time. Your good work goes unseen unless someone disagrees ;) Jeepday (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The huge set of unreferenced articles from June of 2006 is finally completed. Thank you for your contributions. The new focus at Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles is Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2006 which as of May 28 is only 1,322 articles and should go much quicker. Thank you to everyone who has contributed and listed themselves as a volunteer. Jeepday (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter

The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:WerewolfGirlsDorm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WerewolfGirlsDorm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption request

Hi Belovedfreak I was looking at the Adoption page and found you. I just wrote my first article in German about a company. Now I want to write an article about that company in English. However, I am not sure, how I am supposed to prove all my facts as most of the proves are in German. Are you willing to help me?

Best regards, --Nisse149 (talk) 08:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Nisse 149

[edit] 6/11 DYK

On 11 June 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Literature of Burkina Faso, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 11:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter

The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter! Issue XV: June 11, 2008 Hello, members and friends of WP:LGBT! I'm not one to be writing newsletters, but I miss our cruise director, Miss Julie, and our project is drifting along with a few leaking plugs in the bottom of the boat. Hey, it happens. Every group we join goes through changes. If Wikipedia weren't so interesting it wouldn't also be so frustrating sometimes. And vice versa. More than one Wikiproject has tumbleweeds blowing through it, but this is one that can't afford to let that happen. Even if you pop in to the talk page of the project, you can let us know you're still around. [edit] WP:LGBT's Role in HIV / AIDS articles It wouldn't be a proper gay community without a li'l bit o' drama! That's right. If we aren't arguing about something, then we should be asking if we're still queer. Maybe that's for the best, since we know we're still kicking. Our most recent topic is how far the role of our project should go in dipping our toes into HIV/AIDS articles. The main AIDS article was delisted as a Featured Article last month, sadly. (Sending a swift kick to WP:Medicine.) A spirited discussion is available for your entertainment on the WP:LGBT talk page about just how much of HIV and AIDS should we take on. As ever, we'll take your opinions under advisement. We're going to have to, because it doesn't seem to have been settled. [edit] Is Pride POV? We have a pretty cool sidebar that identifies core LGBT articles. Its symbol is the iconic gay pride flag, much like other Wikiprojects have iconic symbols denoting the topic is a core subject in a series of articles. However, a question recently arose asking if the symbol itself is not neutral. Should a pride flag show up at the top of the article on Conversion therapy? How else would anyone know the article is about queer issues? Is there another symbol that is as widely recognized and that includes all our many splintered facets? At what point do we stop asking ourselves all these questions and just go have a mint julep on the verandah and stop caring? [edit] Harvey Milk and Jim Jones For the love of all that is holy, no Kool Aid jokes. However, an editor involved in pioneering San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk's article has included a section about the late supervisor's support of Jim Jones and the People's Temple. While it may be accurate, there is a Request for Comment regarding how much emphasis the section places on Milk's support in light of his overall political influence on the city, and indeed the rest of the United States. Milk's article is a sad one in more ways than one. It lacks the detail and heart that honors its subject. Anyone want to do a barter with me? I'll bring Harvey Milk to featured status (give me a month or two so I can read stuff), if you do something of equal value to WP:LGBT?? Make me an offer... [edit] Queer Studies is offensive! The established branch of study known as Queer studies was brought up as an category for deletion because an editor was offended by the use of "queer" in the title. It was overwhelmingly rejected mostly by the usernames I see here on our Wikiproject page. (A clue that I know you are out there, hiding...biding your time...) So, I wish I could congratulate you, but now I'm all confused by my sympathy for the editor who was offended. So, if you're reading this, Moni has a short memory and can't remember your username. Don't be put off by our demonstrative pushiness. Join us. We can always use involved editors. [edit] Lambda Literary Awards What can you do to help the project out? Be a wiki-fairy, on many levels. There are all kinds of articles that need help. Why, just this morning I removed those ugly wikify and cleanup tags from four articles at random. If you can put [[ ]] around stuff, you can clean up articles. There's a list of articles that need attention at the top of the WP:LGBT talk page. Or you can start with the Lambda Literary Awards, where the goddess of my altar received a pioneering award, and was "reduced to rubble" by Katherine V. Forrest's wonderful speech. The 20th ceremony of the Lambda Literary Awards, which celebrates LGBT literature, took place in West Hollywood on May 29th [1]. The page needs to be updated with the new winners, to be found on the official website [2]. [edit] Yeshayahu Leibowitz, Arthur C. Clarke and Bernard Montgomery Why on earth would someone want to delete material about homosexuality? 'Tis truly a mystery. But these embattled articles have some random evil gnomes removing information that places these folks under our queer umbrella. Help us keep an eye out for the deletions. Take a peek at the articles, familiarize yourselves with the info, and be handy with the undo function in the article history. If tempers flare, take it to the Hall monitors and let them sort it out. Best solution is to make sure your sources are immaculate. [edit] This month's Wiki stars This is what I get for opening my big fat mouth and suggesting the newsletter should be revived. Here I am writing it. So, to pat self on back (*cough*) Mulholland Dr. became a featured article in May. This is A Good Thing since it is my personal declaration that there is no such thing as lesbian porn. I don't care what Benjiboi says about the video collection at goodvibes. Instead, we have hot women who connect on a deep, personal, soul-touching level, so this film should qualify as some of the skankiest porn available for lesbians. Plus, it's completely confusing and surreal! D'you think Laura Harring would care that the article is featured? I don't think so either... (Call me, Laura!) [edit] Compulsive hoarding of templates Once I saw a harrowing episode of Animal Planet's Animal Cops where this guy had, like, 250 cats in his house and it freaked me right out. I'm drawing a parallel between 250 cats and, well...three, really, templates in articles involving LGBT issues. Can we stick to one, maybe? In the aforementioned Harvey Milk's article there's a core LGBT template, a link to the LGBT portal, and a sidebar for LGBT rights. Jiminy! You'd think we weren't the folk to set industrial grey carpeting and track lighting in vogue. An LGBT footer was designed to link to articles of interest that aren't the aforementioned core articles. What do you think, can we have either an LGBT template for core articles, a footer for LGBT articles that are high profile but not core, or an LGBT rights template? As ever, anything's up for discussion on the WP:LGBT talk page. [edit] The Violet Quill and magazines Zigzig20s suggests we create an article on The Violet Quill, as it seems such a milestone in the advancement of gay/queer literature. Members of the Quill all have pages of their own (Edmund White, Christopher Cox, Robert Ferro, Michael Grumley, Andrew Holleran, Felice Picano, and George Whitmore). We need to find more info on the Quill per se to reference the page that we create. Perhaps Google Books - and libraries? - can help. A number of magazines also need articles, perhaps most notably QW, LGNY, and Lesbian Feminist Liberation. [edit] Mom's nagging for Pride Month It's June, Pride month. Wear sunscreen, stay hydrated, get a designated driver, then go half-dressed in the streets find a girlfriend or boyfriend, or some homo who's standing there looking lonely and kiss 'em up real good. Remember, it all started 39 years ago when a bunch of drag queens just got fed the f*ck up by the cops raiding the bar and dragging them all out to the pokey again. Rock on, queens! Enjoy your celebrations. My town's is in October, and 200 people attend. I miss Denver. [edit] Fresh faces to brighten our pages Hey, I've seen you around! Sorry there seem to be so many—it's been a while. But we welcome you all: Cheezisyum21, Taineyah, Dustihowe, Avesta69, RachelSummers77, Vivekgopinathan, AMK1211, Staffwaterboy , Ted Ted, Joe5150, Leahtwosaints, Robapalooza, Arthomure, Confusionball, Affinity likely, PrinceOfCanada, Yobmod, Npd2983, Neagley, Bvlax2005, Bvlax2005, Rhullsf, Textorus, Kieran.casey, Tyciol, Meojive, Sappho'd, Bookkeeperoftheoccult, Gaywarrior, Aujourd'hui, maman est morte, and Balin42632003. It looks like we've picked up a lot of talent lately. We have no doubt you'll be making your indelible mark on LGBT knowledge as we know it, here at Wikipedia. In the immortal words of Miss Julie, "May all your Wiki days be bright, and may your Love Boat never turn into a Poseidon." We miss you, Miss Julie, as well as all the others who have graced our project and are on wiki-breaks or just got fed up with all the nuttiness and went to live their lives. Get your stupid houses built and hurry up and come back. --Moni3 (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC) To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please let us know here. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let Moni3 know.

This newsletter was delivered by §hepBot around 16:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC). ShepBot (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)