Anarcho-pacifism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Part of the Philosophy series on |
 |
|
Theory and practice
Culture
Related
|
Anarcho-pacifism (also pacifist anarchism or anarchist pacifism) is a form of anarchism which completely rejects the use of violence in any form for any purpose.
Contents |
[edit] History
Anarchist pacifism emerged shortly before World War II in Holland, Great Britain and the United States and was a strong presence in the subsequent campaigns for nuclear disarmament. The absence of pacifist sentiment before this time was such that propaganda of the deed was a prevalent form of anarchist activity in the 19th century and that as late as 1881, anarchists were agreed on the general inevitability of violence. Leo Tolstoy, though he opposed the label "anarchism", was a major early influence on anarcho-pacifists, and on Mohandas Gandhi, an Indian independence leader and pacifist who self-identified as an anarchist. However, Tolstoy and his followers never fully embraced the organized anarchist movement, being to some extent hostile towards it, and it was Ferdinand Domela Nieuwenhuis who established the pacifist trend within the anarchist movement.[1]
Among late 20th-century anarcho-pacifists was autarchist Robert LeFevre, who based his pacifism on his belief in the inviolability of property rights.[2][3] LeFevre also spoke out against war, which he considered to be a product of the state, and was convinced of the power of non-violent resistance.[4]
Other notable anarcho-pacifist historical figures include Ammon Hennacy and Jean-Paul Sartre (for a brief period from 1939–40).[5] Ursula K. Le Guin has identified pacifist anarchism as the major utopic element in her novel The Dispossessed.[6]
[edit] Ideological variance
While anarcho-pacifism is most commonly associated with religious anarchism, such as Tolstoyian Christian anarchism and Buddhist anarchism, irreligious or even anti-religious tendencies have emerged. The anarcho-punk band Crass polemicised a variant of anarcho-pacifism whilst at the same time explicitly rejecting all religions, especially the symbols of 'establishment' Christian mythology, even going so far as to incur the threat of legal prosecution in England for criminal blasphemy due to their composition "Reality Asylum".[7] Opposition to the use of violence has not prohibited anarcho-pacifists from accepting the principle of resistance or even revolutionary action provided it does not result in violence; in fact it was their approval of such forms of opposition to power that lead anarcho-pacifists to endorse the anarcho-syndicalist concept of the general strike as the great revolutionary weapon.[1]
[edit] Related topics
[edit] References
- ^ a b Woodcock, George (2004). Anarchism: a History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements. Peterborough: Broadview Press. ISBN 1551116294.
- ^ Doherty, Brian (2007). Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement. New York: PublicAffairsTM, 312. ISBN 978-1-58648-572-6.
- ^ Doherty, Brian (2007). Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement. New York: PublicAffairsTM, 316. ISBN 978-1-58648-572-6.
- ^ Doherty, Brian (2007). Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement. New York: PublicAffairsTM, 319. ISBN 978-1-58648-572-6.
- ^ Taylor, John, "Abandoning Pacifism: The Case of Sartre", Journal of European Studies, Vol. 89, 1993
- ^ Le Guin, Ursula K. (1989). "A Non-Euclidean View of California as a Cold Place to Be", Dancing at the Edge of the World. New York: Grove Press. ISBN 978080211105
- ^ Aitch, Iain. 'Why should we accept any less than a better way of doing things?'. Guardian Unlimited Arts. The Guardian. Retrieved on 2007-12-26.
