User talk:90.203.45.214

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. For one thing, if you edit without a username, your IP address (90.203.45.214) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 London Overground 2 Edit warring on London Overground 3 Cardiff Bus Station 4 Schools on Disambiguation Pages 5 Disruption to Template:Stourbridge Town Branch Line 6 London Midland Image

[edit] London Overground

So you're just going to ignore the entire discussion page and edit away? The logo has to be at the top just like the Tube and DLR, if you're problem is with 2 images, you solve the issue about having 2 infoboxes instead of putting it back to a state that has been rejected for some time. MickMacNee (talk) 21:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

As I said, your are ignoring the discussion page. The Tfl infobox at the top was the established consensus, and the logo at the top is consistent with other articles. I could remove the image from the TOC box to satisfy you, but someone else will no doubt have a problem with that MickMacNee (talk) 21:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

It is not the only way to do it, you are ignoring the discussion. I won't provide a link because it is barely a page long. LO is not a 'company', so reference to the TOC box as having precedence is meaningless. Like I said, you are just re-igniting a previously resolved issue. MickMacNee (talk) 21:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring on London Overground

Please cease edit warring on the article and discuss the contentious matter on Talk:London Overground. I have put a temporary protection on the article for the moment as constant reversion is not the solution to any problem. Timrollpickering (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cardiff Bus Station

I did! I do apologise! :-) Take care! Scarian^Talk 20:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Schools on Disambiguation Pages

Please do not remove schools from disambiguation pages. The express purpose of a disambiguation page is to list all Wikipedia articles on topics commonly or officially referred to by the title of the disambiguation. The school entries are not "indiscriminate" but rather satisfy this exact purpose. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disruption to Template:Stourbridge Town Branch Line

Your edits have been reported to the Administrators Notice Board – Tivedshambo (talk) 07:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

You are not to remove vandalism warnings from your own page. Also, who are you to give vandalism warnings (and false ones at that) to other users when you are not even a registered let alone an established user. What's more, vandalism is not an edit which doesn't conform to your opinion. Welshleprechaun (talk) 14:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] London Midland Image

Copied from the images talk page to alert you. Please complete dissuasion there. Thanks.

The original image no longer exists. Is this an issue? I cannot see how redrawing the image from scratch, making it look the same will help. When I say "remove," I mean that it has been through the image lab and has had all problems with copy vios sorted out.

I think that the image is ok now.

End of copy

Regards, Dewarw (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

What personal attack? I was speaking facts, and was not happy that a user like yourself had said what you had said. When are you going to create an account? If you want to have more of a voice, then one is needed.

Anyway, as for the London Midland image, it is no longer in my hands. As far as I am concerned, it is ok, but the image is now in with the graphics lab. They are the ones who can improve it. I originally uploaded the copyrighted map, which I had no intention to be kept for long. The graphics lab told me they had dealt with all copyright problems.

Please put it through the lab again. They will sort it. Do not delete it until improvements have been made. Articles' quality will go down without it! Dewarw (talk) 17:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]