User talk:MickMacNee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Tesco 2 creating a page 3 DYK 4 WP Translation 5 Swansea Metro 6 Missing articles bot 7 Ireland et al 8 Uncivil/incivil

[edit] Tesco

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tesco. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidea (talk • contribs)

Well, don't say I didn't give you enough of an opportuinity to read the relevant policies. MickMacNee (talk) 16:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] creating a page

let me ask you a question everone elese creates a page about them selves so why was mine deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Trace (talk • contribs) 15:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

• I have no idea what you meant by this question, as it was your first ever edit. However, you now appear to be the reincarnation of a user indefinitely blocked as a vandal. If you continue to edit the way they did, you will likely see the same result. MickMacNee (talk) 19:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 2 June 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article One-armed bandit murder, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Maxim_(talk) 23:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP Translation

Oh I see the message at the top. See village pump bot page ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 12:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Swansea Metro

Please don't drag me into an argument: [1]. Thanks, --RFBailey (talk) 15:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

So, are you retracting your viewpoint then? 'Dragging' you into something is irelevant. MickMacNee (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

No, I still agree with you; I just don't like my name being used in an argument you're having in edit summaries. Anyway, I have posted to Welshleprechaun's talk page here. --RFBailey (talk) 16:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Missing articles bot

Regarding your recent comments on the missing articles bot, I thought you might find it interesting to read this page: WP:TALK, regarding actually confining comments to the subject at hand. John Carter (talk) 23:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

As said, I'm not sure how the state of the wikiprojects are irrelevant to that discussion. MickMacNee (talk) 00:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ireland et al

Thanks for your contribution to the Ireland talk page, I had posed some questions for you at WT:FOOTY some time ago, it would be nice if the issue was dealt with so we can move on Fasach Nua (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

It would be nice if you ever accepted consensus anywhere on wikipedia. Your wiki life seems to consist entirely of going against the norm, and basically pissing people off. Maybe you don't get this, maybe you do. MickMacNee (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I do accept WP:CONSENSUS it is mob rule I have trouble with Fasach Nua (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

It's common sense you have trouble with. You're a joke to be honest. MickMacNee (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Uncivil/incivil

Yes, indeed, which is why Wikpedia needs to be careful not to spread these things, although having said that, spelling mistakes are the least problematic of the things we spread around. :-) SlimVirgin ^talk|edits 20:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)