User talk:SlimVirgin/Archive 13

Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. — Robert Frost

Yuber

I do not know if you noticed but I caught Yuber reverting the request for arbitration page after you reverted him. Enviroknot 23:27, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hold on a second. I was reinstating Smoddy's deletion of your personal attacks, Enviroknot.Yuber^(talk) 23:32, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I haven't been on all day, until just a few minutes ago. The edit is quite clear on diff, you are deleting an item from the evidence against you.Enviroknot 23:35, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Did you really uncork Jihad just so Yuber could go right back in and behave the same way that caused it to be protected previously?Enviroknot 23:51, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Point of order: In light of [2] and [3] shouldn't [4] be changed? or am I missing something? Tomer ^TALK 05:33, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

• You want I should point it out to ArbCom on Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Yuber/Proposed_decision, or you wanna? Tomer ^TALK 05:43, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
  • Done. Tomer ^TALK 05:45, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Jihad article

Same problems again after article has been unprotected. Anon IPs/enviroknot persist certain disputed sections should be added. See edit history. Call to re-protect. Thanks.--Anonymous editor 00:03, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Yuber and Jihad

Yuber appears to be guilty of 3RR already at Jihad. Do you wish to report it or must I?Enviroknot 00:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You did the same. Yuber edited many things, it is not considered 3rr. Thanks. --Anonymous editor 00:08, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Need I show you the diffs?Enviroknot 00:12, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It has been reported.Enviroknot 00:20, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

CltFn/Diglewop

Personally I think the book pages should be unprotected. If CltFn or someone else wants to write actual articles, they should be able to. If all they do is put in the TOC and a few quotes again, we can always redirect it. If you're interested in helping to deal with some of CltFn's POV contributions, I think you should feel free to edit. Someone else can always take care of admin stuff. I do like your suggestion that he pick an article and work on that. Rhobite 21:26, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Heads up to you

Thanks for unprotecting the various book pages you had locked yesterday. I want to make it known upfront what my intentions are.

• I intend on undoing the redirects of the book pages you redirected yesterday.
• As there is no prohibitions from wikipedia (or US copyright policy under fair use) on quotes and table of contents I will also include those in my edits using my own judgment.
• I intend on restoring the chapter lists that you blanked out on various pages as there is no copyright basis for their removal under fair use.
• I do not consider any of my edits set in stone and they are fair game for discussion , and changes based on consensus on the talk page.
• If I create a stub with quotes and a chapter list please realize that it is just that, a stub . All articles start with some sort of skeleton upon which further material gets added.
• It is understood, that wikipedia policy is to be followed.

--CltFn 23:25, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

SlimVirgin based on you comments on request for arbitration , I see that you are over-reacting to this. Are you confusing me with other revert warriors or something?? I am not , I have never violated the 3RRs, and if my inserts violate NPOV I am amenable to changes. The point is that if some inserts are within the parameters allowed by wikipedia policy , I see no reason why I must refrain from them just because some other editors do not like the implications. --CltFn 00:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• 01:06, Jun 23, 2005, Ed Poor blocked CltFn (expires 04:06, Jun 23, 2005) (contribs) (unblock) (NPOV violations, harassing admin) -- Uncle Ed (talk) 01:08, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Maybe later...

... I'm going home in 8 minutes, and I don't edit Wikipedia at home (I have no Internet connection there - by design). - Ta bu shi da yu 07:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Feces

Hi Sarah. I have no problem with you protecting the page if you think it necessary. If I see the page being reverted again today, I'll do it myself. I'm keen not to protect it on the trolling version. I think unprotecting was the right move though, as there has now been a reasonable compromise created, and the only remaining problem is the trolling. Cheers, and thanks for respecting my decision. smoddy 08:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What about us lot? Messing about making some weird free encyclopedia thing... Can't we see that it's doomed to failure?! I have a feeling that a lot of people are getting tired with Eyeon's trolling, and there would be a lot of support for any blocking action. I don't really care for the opinions of trolls. Especially not poo-fixated ones. smoddy 09:14, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I just made that point on the anon's talk page... I would add sockpuppets to my above statement. smoddy 22:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

PA 103

I've replied on my talk page. -- FP ^{<talk><edits>} 09:40, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Shebaa farms stuff at Hezbollah

So, were you planning to put it back? Jayjg ^(talk) 20:12, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your kind words about my photographs! I always appreciate it when someone takes the time to check out my work. Rhobite 20:49, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

Sharon vandal

Actually, I blocked the IP for a few hours to cool it down; vprotection might not be necessary. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Poll at Talk:Terrorism

I've put together a little poll at Talk:Terrorism regarding the "lone wolf" section. Your input would be appreciated. Thx. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:23, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

BrandonYusufToropov

Aside from genuinely believing that he'd make a steady admin (he's been subjected to tremendous harrassment, and kept his cool admirably), I think that the presence of Enviroknot and Klonimus, as well as some of the other usual suspects, voting against him indicates that there's a strong anti-Islamic element to all this. I agree that the circumstances of his nomination were peculiar, but that in fact has little to do with him (more with the lapse in judgement of Ed Poor) or his fitness. I'm not suggesting that you change your vote (it's pretty clear that his nomination is going to fail), only explaining my concern, and the reason for my question. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:26, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The presence of the usual Islamists in his support is an indicator the other way. I wouldn't recommend myself for Admin and I don't think he should be either. Then again, I've seen enough out of you and Mel to indicate that neither of you should be trusted with that sort of power either.Enviroknot 00:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You wouldn't recommend yourself for admin? LOL!! At last, some intelligence! SlimVirgin ^(talk) 01:00, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Feces

I was trying to help by archiving the "crap" (old disputes and personal attacks.) I can't believe how rude your message was. The Wikipedia engine said the page was too long, I was doing what it told me to do. What else am I supposed to do? LittleRedRidingHood (talk · contribs) aka Eyeon (talk · contribs) aka Fecologist (talk · contribs) aka Niglet (talk · contribs)