User talk:Vegas949
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome To My Talk Page
[edit] First Federal Bank
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of First Federal Bank, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.1stfedbank.com/aboutParent.cfm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] First Federal Bank
A tag has been placed on First Federal Bank, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of First Federal Bank and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Shootthedevgru (talk) 05:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] State National Bank
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article State National Bank, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Los Alamos National Bank
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Los Alamos National Bank, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lanb.com/lanb/about.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Pioneer Bank
A tag has been placed on Pioneer Bank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gary King (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Molander and Associates
The article Molander and Associates has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bob Bresnahan
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Bob Bresnahan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Removing Tags
Please stop removing improvement tags without addressing the concerns in the tags. Tags are there to help improve articles. I am placing the citation tag back on The Money Store article, please do not remove it unless you add references to the article.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 07:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Last I checked there were no sources, just an external link to the official site. But it seems that the article was speedy deleted... so the point is a moot now.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Money Store
Article had no verifiable independent sources to establish notability, and claimed discounted rates sourced only to the company. Capitalising MONEY STORE is also spammy. Content appeared to be list of directors and, bizarrely, a list of US states, nothing on the size of the company, amount lent etc. The lack of evidence of notability, combined with a degree of spamminess seemed enough for deletion. Jimfbleak (talk) 08:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image placeholders
Per the outcome of Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders, please do not add these to articles as long as there is no consensus for their usage. Sandstein 07:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
