User talk:Gary King

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If I left you a message: please answer on my talk page, else inform me. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

October 2004–December 2005 January 2006–December 2006 January 2007–December 2007 January 2008–April 11, 2008 April 12, 2008–present

This talk page is automatically archived. Any sections older than 1 days are automatically archived.

Contents 1 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Eric Brewer (ice hockey) 2 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2008 attacks on North Indians in Maharashtra 3 Re:RfA courtesy blank 4 Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Montana class battleship 5 Use of "p" and "pp" for page-numbers in citation templates

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Eric Brewer (ice hockey)

Thanks for your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Eric Brewer (ice hockey)! I've gone through the article and have addressed all of your concerns. I hope to gain your support. Thanks! – Nurmsook! (talk) 00:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2008 attacks on North Indians in Maharashtra

Thanks for your comments. Please have look at the addressals and also a query I have posted at the FAC. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 (talk) 05:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:RfA courtesy blank

Done. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 06:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Holy crap, you review a lot of stuff now. Sandy must be happy for having another consistent reviewer. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 06:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I try to reach every FTC, FAC, and FLC when I can and if I have more time, then make my reviews longer. But at the very least, I try to pitch in a few suggestions if I am short on time or if the subject matter does not interest me as much. Gary King (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Montana class battleship

Apologies for the reposting, but you archived the other note I left ya :) A copyedit was just completed by maralia, and I have come to ask if you would recheck the article and see if the copyedit addressed your concerns (and this time, I left a link for you use :) TomStar81 (Talk) 04:45, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Use of "p" and "pp" for page-numbers in citation templates

This edit seems far off consensus for citation formatting? WP:CITE (and its WP:CITE/ES) and {{cite journal}} (and relate templates) all appear to use bare numbers in their examples. DMacks (talk) 08:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Changed back for journal references. Gary King (talk) 08:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)