Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 July 7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] July 7
[edit] Image:ATSMAP2007.JPG
Image is most likely NOT user-created and was taken from a copyrighted source. The image also includes a copyrighted logo at the bottom. — Dream out loud (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Oliviadehavilland.jpg
looks like a publicity photo, including a serial number in the bottom right hand corner, although it says it is user created. — Rossrs 01:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- I scaned it from my own photo and put my name on it!! What cat should it be in?-Sheila
-
- Most likely it should be {{Non-free promotional}}, and a source, copyright holder and fair use rationale will need to be added to the image description page. Help:Image page gives a good explanation of what's needed. Scanning a photo that you own does not mean you own the copyright for it, so the original tag was incorrect. Hope this helps. Rossrs 16:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you and have changed it!! -Sheila
[edit] Image:BF_flyer.jpg
No evidence copyright holder granted uploader permisssion to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BOMB-Magazine-issue100.jpg
Permission documentation from BOMM magazine not supplied. Nv8200p talk 02:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BOMB-Magazine-issue3.jpg
Permission documentation from BOMB magazine not supplied. Nv8200p talk 02:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BRICKS_layered_architecture.png
Source website has all rights reserved. Not GFDL as claimed in image summary. Nv8200p talk 02:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BRICKS_user_access.png
Source website is all rights reserved, not GDFL as claimed in the image summary. Nv8200p talk 02:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BWatch.png
Image is probably copyrighted by the owner's of the TV show the image is in with no evidence they granted permission to release under the GFDL or creative commons. Nv8200p talk 03:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Badr1Launch.jpg
No evidence copyright holder gave permission to uploader to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bahiadecorral.jpg
No evidence provided of any permissions granted. Nv8200p talk 03:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BahrainFormula1.jpg
No evidence of permission from copyright holder to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BahrainNationalMuseum.jpg
No evidence from copyright holder to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BahrainTradDressF.jpg
No evidence from copyright holder for permission to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Baiji.jpg
No evidence that copyright holder gave permission to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Baja_panorama.JPG
No evidence of permission from copyright holder to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BalineseTranceSeance.jpg
No evidence copyright holder gave permission for uploader to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:3_Women_and_a_Chateau.jpg
Which license? MER-C 06:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Uploader has Wikipedia email enabled. Email asking clarification sent. -N 15:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- No reply. -Nard 13:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Replying now: I made this image. Just learning wiki ways, and how to respond... thanks garyw101@earthlink.net
[edit] Image:Dead60sband.jpg
Image is apparently taken from wallpaper on the band's site, but was released into the public domain by the copyright holder. Anybody else have a hard time believing that? fuzzy510 07:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Laura-M-13.jpg
Not work safe. Tagged as PD-self, but uploader unlikely to be creator. Videmus Omnia 16:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:00000007.jpg
Not work safe. Tagged as PD-self, but uploader unlikely to be creator. Videmus Omnia 16:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Elevation1.jpg
Listed as both copyrighted and GFDL. Videmus Omnia 18:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC) \
[edit] Image:CarterF.jpg
I don't know who actually owns the photo, but worldstadiums.com has this same photo at [2]. It's a web-resolution picture (not something likely taken with a digital camera). BigΔT 19:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:The_Stooges_2007.jpg
Image is the basis for the main image of the band's homepage (http://www.iggypop.com/) and appears in the photos section of their myspace page (http://www.myspace.com/iggyandthestooges). There is no indication in either place that it is released under cc-by-sa-2.0, and even if it was, it does not provide the attribution required by that license. When I first saw this image yesterday, it was licensed as {{PD-self}}. BigrTex 19:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm unsure where the best place to make this comment, but I'll do it here. I have made an inquiry at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems concerning this case and problems I see with the decision made by User:Howcheng. __meco 21:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:26d1ab1b94a18f1b547f33f06a7b3c1e200608170fullcy3.jpg
Licensed as {{PD-self}}, but with a fan forum topic listed as the source. No indication that any of the images in that topic (I couldn't find this image) were released from copyright. BigrTex 20:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
