Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 July 6
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < July 5 | Friday, 6 July 2007 | July 7 > |
|---|
[edit] July 6
[edit] Image:KuhLedesamFilipinoJazSinger.jpg
derivative of Image:KuhLedesamFilipinoJazSingerBostonPoster.jpg which was uploaded with a "fair use" tag. bluemask (talk) 02:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Corrections made on image talk page. Citing basis of the derivative image. Are these sufficient enough? Advise will be appreciated. Dragonbite 03:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- You cannot make a derivative of a copyrighted image and release it on public domain. The copyright of the derivative image is still owned by the copyright holder of the original. There must be an evidence that he or she (the copyright holder) release the image under a free license or public domain. --bluemask (talk) 04:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- What's the suggested/proper tag for this? Tried to request from a Kuh Ledesma site permission for an image (a looooong time ago). No response... This one is irreplaceable. Dragonbite 18:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you can't get permission the only option is to argue "fair use" - but as the picture is of a living person that is unlikely to swing it. The image is also currently an orphan and so again this would mean it can't class as fair use. Madmedea 20:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Someone keeps removing it from the article. Dragonbite 21:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Source is indicated on the image's description page. Dragonbite 17:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Someone keeps removing it from the article. Dragonbite 21:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you can't get permission the only option is to argue "fair use" - but as the picture is of a living person that is unlikely to swing it. The image is also currently an orphan and so again this would mean it can't class as fair use. Madmedea 20:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- What's the suggested/proper tag for this? Tried to request from a Kuh Ledesma site permission for an image (a looooong time ago). No response... This one is irreplaceable. Dragonbite 18:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Image:KLA crimes.jpg
Warning: very graphic image. Uploader claims cc-by-2.5 but personal authorship is extremely unlikely given the subject matter. -- ChrisO 18:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Gillian_Condy12.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to a 1991 book, no evidence of claimed license. But|seriously|folks 02:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ellaphie_Ward-Hilhorst00.jpg
Tagged GFDL but attributed to a museum, no evidence of claimed license. But|seriously|folks 03:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Dr_RA_Dyer_image02.jpg
Tagged GFDL but attributed to a museum, no evidence of claimed license. But|seriously|folks 03:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Xia_Xiaowan00.jpg
Uploader asserts permissions forwarded to OTRS but no indication that permissions were satisfactory. But|seriously|folks 03:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:B-300a1.jpg
No evidence uploader has the right to grant use of the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:B.B._the_Bluefish.PNG
No evidence uploader has rights to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:B105c160.jpg
No evidence uploader has rights to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BBC_BASIC_Component_Parts.jpg
No evidence uploader was granted permission to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- You cannot copyright raw information, it should be a simple matter to redraw this flow chart and then simply credit the book as the source of the information if someone were up to the challenge. Might as well do it right and do it in svg if you're gonna do it from scratch. -N 23:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BBxRae3.jpg
Looks like a copyrighted work uploader is claimng as their own. Nv8200p talk 03:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment even if it isn't a screen capture from the animated show (I'd lay odds it is), the characters used and IDed by the uploader, the same editor who inserted it into Beast Boy, a held under copyright and trademark by DC Comics. It maybe a case that the uploader misunderstood the licensing material and though that he could release the cap file he made, regardless of its contents. - J Greb 06:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pierneef_Rustenburgkloof.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to an author "long deceased". In fact, author has only been dead for 50 years. But|seriously|folks 04:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pierneef_MajubaNatal.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to an artist who has been dead just 50 years. But|seriously|folks 04:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pierneef_LouisTrichard.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to an artist who has been dead just 50 years. But|seriously|folks 04:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pierneef_KnysnaHeads.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to an artist who has been dead just 50 years. But|seriously|folks 04:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pierneef_Stellenbosch.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to an artist who has been dead just 50 years. But|seriously|folks 04:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:EE_Galpin.jpg
Tagged as PD because author has been dead for more than 100 years, but author is not identified, so there is no way to verify copyright status. But|seriously|folks 04:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Charles_Michell00.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but identified as "publicity photo". But|seriously|folks 04:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Herman_Charles_Bosman00.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to unidentified author "long deceased", subject of image lived until the 1950's. But|seriously|folks 04:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Judith_mason09.jpg
Tagged as GFDL; Not self taken; Permission asserted but undocumented. But|seriously|folks 04:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Judith_mason08.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else; no indication that uploader has ability to release under GFDL. But|seriously|folks 04:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Judith_mason07.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else; no indication that uploader has ability to release under GFDL. But|seriously|folks 04:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Judith_mason06.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else; no indication that uploader has ability to release under GFDL. But|seriously|folks 04:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Judith_mason04.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else; no indication that uploader has ability to release under GFDL. But|seriously|folks 04:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Judith_mason03.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else; no indication that uploader has ability to release under GFDL. But|seriously|folks 04:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Judith_mason02.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else; no indication that uploader has ability to release under GFDL. But|seriously|folks 04:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Judith_mason01.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else; no indication that uploader has ability to release under GFDL. But|seriously|folks 04:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Basil_schonland01.jpg
No indication that South African stamps are exempt from copyright protection. But|seriously|folks 04:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Basil_schonland00.jpg
No indication that South African stamps are excluded from copyright protection.l But|seriously|folks 04:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:John_Hutchinson03.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else who lived until the 1970's. But|seriously|folks 04:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:John_Hutchinson02.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else who lived until the 1970's. But|seriously|folks 04:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:John_Hutchinson00.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed as "Official Kew Photo". But|seriously|folks 04:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Saasveld01.jpg
Tagged as GFDL but attributed as promotional photo from press kit; this is a replaceable fair use image. But|seriously|folks 04:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Rosa_Hope03.jpg
Tagged GFDL but attributed to somebody else. No indication that uploader is authorized to license work. But|seriously|folks 05:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Rosa_Hope02.jpg
Tagged GFDL but attributed to somebody else. No indication that uploader is authorized to license work. But|seriously|folks 05:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Phyllis_McCarthy04.jpg
Tagged GFDL but attributed to somebody else. No indication that uploader is authorized to license work. But|seriously|folks 06:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Phyllis_McCarthy01.jpg
Tagged GFDL but appears to be a studio photo. No indication that uploader is authorized to license work. But|seriously|folks 06:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:26011907.jpg
Image seems to be a press image and the lack of licensing and source add to the fact it's likely copyrighted. Wikidudeman (talk) 06:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Clevis.png
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to catalog of fasteners with "no copyright restrictions". But|seriously|folks 06:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Cathy_O'Dowd00.JPG
Tagged as GFDL but attributed to someone else. Use "by arrangement" with another is asserted, but no details are provided as to the extent of the allegedly permissible use. But|seriously|folks 06:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Percy_Amoils00.jpg
Tagged as GFDL, attributed to subject as donor, no indication that uploader has authority to license and no confirmation of permission. But|seriously|folks 06:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Swedishbitters02.jpg
Claimed to be uploader's "own image", but looks suspiciously like a photo of someone else's work. But|seriously|folks 06:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- This looks to be {{PD-ineligible}}, although I don't really see the point of having an image of this. howcheng {chat} 18:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Skaife2a.jpg
Tagged as GFDL, attributed to a magazine, permission is asserted but not confirmed But|seriously|folks 06:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Hungarian_telephone_token_obverse.jpg
Offical token - (Not) Currency ShakespeareFan00 09:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Anglesea.jpg
Looks like an offical crest ShakespeareFan00 09:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Hungarian_telephone_token_reverse.jpg
Offical token (but not currency) ShakespeareFan00 10:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Looks like a utilitarian article, and the art on it looks like a trademark maybe. Trademark but not copyright is my guess. -N 00:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Anna123.jpeg
Looks like a publicty shot ShakespeareFan00 10:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Audreycorrie.jpg
Screenshot or publicty photo most likley copyright to ITV ShakespeareFan00 12:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Parrs_wood_school_campus.jpg
Areial shot - No indcation uploader is photgrpaher ShakespeareFan00 12:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Seal2007.gif
uploader has uploaded many album covers under {{PD-self}}. I tend to doubt that this portrait of Seal (musician) is his to release BigrTex 16:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nogalbomb.png
According to the link given, the image is not credited to the NSF, but to "Mete Sozen and Julio Ramirez, Purdue University School of Civil Engineering" Hux 18:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: just fix the credit and change to fair use. --F3rn4nd0 (Roger - Out) 07:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Found their email addresses online and sent them a message requesting a free content license release. howcheng {chat} 17:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Danielclark.jpg
Contradictory statement "I own the copyroght to this image, and i uploaded it from google." —Remember the dot (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Additional images with the same problem:
- Image:Poppin.jpg
- Image:Treysongz.jpg
- Image:Dannylol.jpg
- Image:Pretty ricky.jpg
- --Carnildo 22:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Geoffrey Richman-1950.jpg
Claimed to be PD-self as creator, which would only apply if the person who created it is the photographer. This looks like a professionally staged photo, not a candid, and thus PD-self would only apply if the person who took the photo is releasing it. Corvus cornix 23:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
