Talk:Hattrick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of massively multiplayer online games. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the the assessment scale. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 Archives |
|
Contents |
[edit] Hattrick nominated for MMOGCM
I have nominated Hattrick for the Massively Multiplayer Online Game Collaboration of the Month. Please take a second to look at Hattrick's nomination over at the MMOGCM nominations page. -DMurphy 23:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Material added by 80.86.98.234
This material does not appear to satisfy Wikipedia's verifiability policy, from which I quote:
- "Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for fact-checking or with no editorial oversight."
There is no editorial oversight in a forum posting.
- "Material from self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources in articles about themselves, so long as:
-
- it does not involve claims about third parties;"
Since these edits (and the questionable source cited) details claims about the behaviour of third parties, it fails to satisfy the verifiability policy.
If a source from a mainstream publication with editorial oversight (e.g. a gaming magazine) can be cited for this, then the information may be able to be added back. Until then, it should not be. - Mark 07:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Material added by 80.86.98.234
I see your point and you are right. Although the case is real, and the abuse is obvious, I can't prove anything, because it's my word against theirs. This material intended to show that sometimes the decisions of the GMs are not the correct ones, and that the Senior GMs are also impassible to the appeals. I wanted to show that the abuses are tolerated, and despite my statement no changes were made regarding this decision. I'm very disappointed, and I'm sorry I "invested" two years of my life in a game I thought it was a fair-play promoter. Sorry for the trouble! You have nothing to do with this...
Save God it was only a game... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.86.98.234 (talk) 13:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV... 5.3 Scandal.
Significant data missed:
1st, (unofficial) voting on National Coaches forum. Coaches voted for changes. 2nd, change of rules as rollback for age reform. Any eligible (for this world cup) player before age reform become eligible after change of rules. 3rd, mad night. September, 14.
HT: Preferansist, coach of U-20 Russia. 195.131.163.29 14:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Economy section
Does anyone else think the Economy section of the Problems sections is too opinionated... not to mention unreasonably negative? It comes across as being written by a particular use with a major objection to the game, while the points about difficulties retaining players are verifiably false, given the many long-time users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zealotus (talk • contribs) 14:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion reason
Trophy Manager was speedy deleted, and hattrick is basically similar in terms of notability, so I speedied it. Smartyllama (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, Trophy Manager is played by less than tenth of the number of people that play Hattrick. I think that anything that's as big as a small state should be kept. I don't mind adding references to the article, as there must be some. I've seen even couple of TV-programs that interviewed Hattrick users. --Jhattara (Talk · Contrib) 07:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sources
Find sources: Hattrick — news, books, scholar
- Add this as independient coverage of the game. Use it to source some claims instead of sourcing everything from hattrick.org --Enric Naval (talk) 03:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
