Talk:Graphic adventure game
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merger proposal
Aren't graphical adventure games and Point-and-click adventure games pretty much the same thing? Point and click adventure games are always graphical adventure games. And graphical adventure games are almost ALWAYS point and click adventure games -- except the early forms that still used a text parser. Since you don't see text parsers very often anymore, it's safe to say they're an artifact. The graphical adventure game article should mention text parsers in its history section. Separating PNC from other graphical adventures is messy enough to reduce the overall usefulness of two separate articles. The information is better off together. 65.95.157.232 (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- There IS some research to support this. This page [1] shows that PNC adventures are closely related to graphical adventures. I've been busy with lots of other video game genre pages, but I will get around to this issue soon enough. Randomran (talk) 08:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'd tend to agree, the point & click adventure game is at most a deviation of the graphic adventure game. I'd merge it here. -- Sabre (talk) 22:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, just make sure that P&C get a top-level section for distinguishing them. --MASEM 05:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Wow, the WP:video games project never ceases to amaze me. You guys were pretty quick. This article has been sitting here with no real feedback or improvements for a few months and has bugged me every time I pop in. So I'm going to get to that merge right away. Randomran (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Support merge, graphic adventure is text adventure's/interactive fiction's opposite number, the point and click interface is just the natural progression within the genre. Someoneanother 15:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:C64 Maniac Mansion.png
The image Image:C64 Maniac Mansion.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)