Citizen media

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The term citizen media refers to forms of content produced by private citizens who are otherwise not professional journalists. Citizen journalism, participatory media and democratic media are related principles.

Contents 1 Principles of citizen media 2 Modes of citizen media 2.1 Radio 2.2 Television 2.3 Internet 2.4 Video 3 References 4 See also 5 External links

[edit] Principles of citizen media

There are many forms of citizen-produced media including blogs, vlogs, podcasts, digital storytelling, participatory video and more, and may be distributed via television, radio, internet, email, movie theatre, DVD and many other forms. Many organizations and institutions exist to facilitate the production of media by private citizens including, but not limited to, Public access, independent media centers and Community technology centers.

Citizen media has bloomed with the advent of technological tools and systems that facilitate production and distribution of media. Of these technologies, none has advanced citizen media more than the Internet. With the birth of the Internet and into the 1990s, citizen media has responded^{[citation needed]} to traditional mass media's neglect of public interest and partisan portrayal of news and world events. Media produced by private citizens may be as factual, satirical, neutral or biased as any other form of media but has no political, social or corporate affiliation.

By 2007, the success of small, independent, private journalists began to rival corporate mass media in terms of audience and distribution. Citizen produced media has earned higher status and public credibility since the 2004 US Presidential elections and has since been widely replicated by corporate marketing and political campaigning. Traditional news outlets and commercial media giants have experienced declines in profit and revenue which can be directly attributed to the wider acceptance of citizen produced media as an official source of information.^[1]

Many people prefer the term 'participatory media' to 'citizen media' as citizen has a necessary relation to a concept of the nation-state. The fact that many millions of people are considered stateless and often without citizenship limits the concept to those recognised only by governments. Additionally the very global nature of many participatory media initiatives, such as the Independent Media Center, makes talking of journalism in relation to a particular nation-state largely redundant as it's production and dissemination do not recognise national boundaries.

[edit] Modes of citizen media

[edit] Radio

The "Public Broadcasting Service" in the United States initiated by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 sets aside some public funding for producing electronic programming. Traditionally, PBS radio affiliates have not made concessions for private citizen programming or production.

• Stations like WBAI, KPFK, KPFK, and Pacifica Radio Network have program models which allow citizen participation in aspects of the station, including production.

• Many low power FCC non-commercial/educational license holders are considered community radio stations (including high school radio and college radio), with various levels of participation by the public.

[edit] Television

With the birth of cable television in the 1950s came public interest movements to democratize this new booming industry. Many countries around the world developed legislated means for private citizens to access and use the local cable systems for their own community-initiated purposes.

• Public Access Television in the United States is a government mandated model that provides citizens within a cable franchised municipality to get access to the local cable channels to produce and distribute their own television programming. Public access programming is community initiated and serves as a platform to meet local programming needs.

• Community channels in Canada also provides access for citizens to distribute their own programming content, as well as community television in Australia.

• Community technology centers are private non-profit organizations found in the US that serve to increase access and training in technology for social applications.

[edit] Internet

Affordable consumer technology and broader access to the internet has created new electronic distribution methods. While the corporate media market enjoyed a long period of monopoly on media distribution, the internet gave birth to countless independent media producers and new avenues for delivering content to viewers.

• The technological development of Content Management Systems (CMS) in the late 1990s, which allowed non-technical people to author and publish articles to the internet, spawned the birth of weblogs or blogs, Podcasting (audio blogs), Vlogs (video blogs), collaborative wikis, and web-based bulletin boards and "forums".^[2]

• The social development of Independent Media Centers (IMCs) introduced collaborative Citizen media with concepts of consensus decision making, mandatory inclusion of women and minorties, non-corporate control, the anonymous accreditation. IMCs have been founded in over 200 cities all over the world.^{[citation needed]}

• Commercial models that use these new methods are being born and acquired by media corporations on a daily basis.

[edit] Video

Participatory video is an approach to and medium of participatory or citizen media that has become increasingly popular with the falling cost of film/video production, availability of simple consumer video cameras and other equipment, and ease of distribution via the Internet.

Although videos/films can be produced by a single individual, production often requires a group of participants. And, so participatory filmmaking includes a set of techniques to involve communities/groups in conceptualizing and producing their own films. Chris Lunch, a preeminent contemporary author on participatory video and executive director of Insight, explains that “The idea behind this is that making a video is easy and accessible, and is a great way of bringing people together to explore issues, voice concerns, or simply to be creative and tell stories.”^[3]

Participatory video was developed in opposition to more traditional documentary film approaches, in which indigenous knowledge and local initiatives are filmed and disseminated by outside professional filmmakers. These professionals, who are often from relatively privileged backgrounds use their artistic license to design narrative stories and interpret the meaning of the images/actions that they film. As such, the film is often created for the benefit of outsiders and those that are filmed rarely benefit from their participation. The objectives of participatory video are to facilitate empowerment, community self-sufficiency, and communication.^[4]

Participatory video techniques were first implemented by Don Snowden, a Canadian who pioneered the idea of using media to enable communication between policy-makers and isolated indigenous communities.^[5] These initial interventions took place in 1967 on Fogo Island, Newfoundland and Labrador, in collaboration with a small fishing community off the eastern coast of Newfoundland. By watching each other’s films, the villagers realized that they shared many of the same concerns and they joined together to create solutions. The villager’s films were shared with policy-makers, many of whom had no real conception of the conditions in which Fogo Islanders lived. As a result of this dialogue, policy-makers introduced regulation changes. Snowden went on to apply the Fogo process all over the world until his death in India in 1984.^[6] Since then, most of the development of the participatory video technique has been led by non-academic practitioners in the United Kingdom, France, Australia, and Canada.

Participatory videos are distributed online and offline. Online, they are uploaded and shared through vlogs, social software, and video publishing sites.

Participatory video can be particularly effective when utilized in addressing community health concerns.^[7]

[edit] References

1. ^ Peter Leyden, New Politic Institute [1]
2. ^ The more proper "fora" is rarely used in this context.
3. ^ Lunch, N., & Lunch, C. (2006). Insights Into Participatory Video: A Handbook for the Field (1st ed.). Oxford: Insight.
4. ^ Lunch, C. (2004). Participatory Video: Rural People Document their Knowledge and Innovations. Indigenous Knowledge Notes; 71.
5. ^ Snowden, D. (1968). Eyes See; Ears Hear: Memorial University, Newfoundland.
6. ^ Lunch, C. (2006, March). Participatory Video as a Documentation Tool. Leisa Magazine, 22, 31-33.
7. ^ Catalani, Caricia. (2006). Videovoice Theory. Accessed at http://video-voice.org/theory.html on Oct 18, 2007.

[edit] See also

• Alternative views
• Community Media Association
• Independent World Television
• Independent Media Center
• Media democracy
• city wiki

[edit] External links

• The OneWorldTV site has a section devoted to Participatory Video
• The VideoVoice Collective does research and evaluation on participatory video.
• Center for Citizen Media
• Media Democracy Day
• Media Democracy Project
• Center for Media and Democracy
• Demosphere Project — The wiki & global project to develop a community based media framework using open source and interactive software. (Wikinews article)
• McChesney, Robert, Making Media Democratic, Boston Review, Summer 1998