Talk:Zia-ul-Haq's Islamization
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
Interesting to read ! --Bhadani 16:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV?
The article repeatedly condemns Zia'a Islamic laws and expresses the author's point of view - that these laws have damaged Pakistan, etc.
While I don't think I actually disagree with the author's assessment, the article might be edited to make it more neutral?
I think it's fine. What good do you suggest came out by forcing the definition of Islam upon people? Some of the things that he did were nowhere near what Islam teaches and merely his own fantacies. Some of these odd biased and prejudiced laws are still in practice in Pakistan, and in clear violation of basic human rights, and the UN has tried many a times to get Pakistan to change them, but in vain. Islam is a universal religion and thus should be attractive to all the peoples of the world in its original form.
umair m
I also agree that this article is 100% fine. If the truth about Zia is hard to endure I guess you should read other articles. 24.90.163.84
It's irrelevant whether you agree with an opinion, really. There -is- a difference between fact and opinion and this needs to be made clear; NPOV is to be upheld even (especially?) when we're discussing the Holocaust or female genital cutting. I'm doing some gnomework to fix the more blatant examples.
Also: please remember to sign the talk page when you post. Ramidel 21:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
