From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
unblock|I did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to deserve my 48-hour block's change to indefinite
- Reviewed. No this account was used for nothing but vandalism and the blocking admin extended the block since the same vandalism continued after this was blocked using a sockpuppet. --pgk(talk) 16:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "User:Francs2000 did not have CheckUser access at the time, so what proof is there that I used a sockpuppet after being blocked 48 hours?"
Decline reason: "Obvious cases of sockpuppetry do not require checkuser access"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
Then what obvious proof is there that I used a sockpuppet? Apparently the "What links here" link from my user page brings up User:V9, but that user did not engage in the same vandalism I did. --Z6 19:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
