Talk:Yum cha
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Odd picture
The picture of the teacup and bowl looks a bit odd. Shouldn't the cup be on the table and the rice bowl on the plate? LDHan 15:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Every restaurant has its very own way of how to put their cups and plates. -- Jerry Crimson Mann 16:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. LDHan 18:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
The picture at the top is not a restaurant in Hong Kong, it's a restaurant in Chatswood, Australia. I've lived in both countries and there aren't any restaurants in Hong Kong that still use those carts. Sausageman 10:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thats Hong kong city hall. I have changed it back. You can also check the image license. It is part of a HK photo set. Even the comment saids HK city hall Benjwong 16:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mandarin version
Does this term 飲茶 exist in Mandarin? If this term is unique to Cantonese, then it is meaningless to include a Hanyu pinyin transcription of it. Instead, a translation of the term used in (Mandarin) Chinese should be given.
- 飲茶 doesn't exist in Mandarin. Sure, it does translate as "Drinking Tea," but that's not what it's implied in Cantonese. As the article correctly pointed out --- Yum Cha, as a way of eating breakfast, is limited to the Chinese people who are mostly Cantonese speaking. In fact, the pronunciation of “Yum Cha” is strictly Cantonese, a Mandarin speaker would pronunciation it different. TheAsianGURU 20:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Because dim sum is quite cantonese, yum cha would make sense as a name. The pinyin is like a translation bonus. Don't over analysize it. Benjwong 02:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Classification and Pricing
- The "Classification and Pricing" section is badly in need of something resembling a reference to back up that rather interesting list of prices. It's a noteworthy chart, and I'm guessing it's probably based on someone's personal experience (and may be largely correct) but "in my experience" generally isn't a valid reference for an encyclopedia article. --Astarf (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)