Talk:Yi I

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (major fields): Philosophers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea (History), a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
	Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please help us improve this article.
	Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] References Please !

This article on a truly important Korean is in need of references. 64.229.149.239 21:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comment by User:Mark A. Peterson

moved from main page

In the table to the right Yi I has his name listed under two romanizations: in the revised system, it is correct as: I I . In the McCune-Reischauer table it is liste INCORRECTLY as I I. The title of the article, the biography, is Yi I , which is the McCune-Reischauer standard. The table should be corrected from I I, it should be Yi I.

Indeed, "Yi" is widely used (and widely used in the Revised system as well), which is why it's reflected in the article title. However, it does not appear to have official status, and so here and elsewhere it is not reflected in the name table. -- Visviva 07:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

“Actually [李] is pronounced in the standard dialect and should be Romanized I, but some may prefer to retain the older Romanization, Yi, because that is already the familiar form. In any case the other Romanizations of 李, Ri and Li, should not be used.”—McCune, Reischauer

(Emphasis mine.) As I understand the above quote, McCune and Reischauer say that while the McCune-Reischauer romanisation is I, some may prefer to use Yi, which – unlike Ri and Li – would be all right, but wouldn't be McCune-Reischauer. Wikipeditor 13:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)