Talk:Yasui v. United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Yasui v. United States has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment. | |||
 |
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on November 22, 2007. | |||
|
||||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been assessed as Low-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This page is part of WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon. To participate: join (or just read up) at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion. |
|
| PSU stuff & Applegate Trail are the current Collaborations of the week. | ||
| GA |
This page is rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. | |
| Mid | This article is rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. |
| GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. |
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Asian Americans, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Asian Americans on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
[edit] Good article nomination on hold
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of January 23, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Yes, but see comments.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Yes
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes
- 4. Neutral point of view?: No problem
- 5. Article stability? Stable
- 6. Images?: Ok
The article satisfies GA criteria with one exception. The lead should be longer. I suggest two paragraphs.
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Ruslik (talk) 08:57, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- The lead has been expanded, thank you for your comments and effort reviewing the article. Let me know if this is enough or anything else needs to be addressed. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
I think that is enough. Ruslik (talk) 10:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
