Talk:Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict 2001
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Either I am real dense or StarOfDavid is being real impulsive at best. His compulsion to call any and all violence against Israeli "terrorism" strikes me as very wrong, as does his treatment of BL. I have only been here for a few days, but I sincerely feel that Star deserves a warning at the very least, and possibly a temporary blocking if he does not behave. -- Luis Dantas 15:53 Feb 5, 2004
I agree completely with Luis. This article needs rewording, without the clear bias, and merging with a page to detail all the violence in the conflict, as it is most definitely a two-way story. Bias has no place on wikipedia.
- Violence done in the name of a political aim, whether it is intifada, or independence of Palestine, or whatever is terrorism as opposed to someone killing another for his money, over a lover's quarrel, or just being mean. Carlossuarez46 21:10, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
I completely agree. This article stinks of massive bias. The wording wherever possible is biased. Someone change this please.
I agree, very POV page, and where are the references? why is this page up with no links or references??
Awful article, showing none of the israeli violence commited on palestenians, and exagerating palestenian violence. I guess a list of israeli terror acts would take up too much space.
I agree too, this article is biased and thus has no merit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.187.21 (talk) 10:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree too. This article is totally unsourced and incredibly biased. Even the few references to Palestinian victims (even though there are, in fact, more of them) are not counted in some the monthly 'totals'. Buttockhat (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)