Talk:Urd (Oh My Goddess!)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Personality section

I rewrote that section abit. I removed reduddent repetive lines by merging them a bit. I also removed several examples of her failiures as the list can get long very easily :)

Also please do not revert rewrites. Just trying to improve article quality here :)

--Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• I see your point, but the elaboration I added back in helps explain Urd's complex character persona and various situations of how it gets her into trouble. :) Please allow me to kep the elaborative anaylisis, but I agree to remove some of her screw-ups; I see what you mean by repetitive. :)-MegamanZero|Talk 16:40, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

And I made an edit by simply rewriting the section over again, I didn't make any reverts. -MegamanZero|Talk 16:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[1] is a result of a revert. The total diference between your edits is minimal and in the process my edits are completely gone aside from a link to belldandy... Thats a revert. There is a level of unequenes but thats a still a revert. "For a Goddess" is redundent for example. I spent 3 hours typing that, least you can do is read and modify it rather than disregarding it and completely removing it. I havent removed any info, I reorganised existing info, removed some quotations of belldandy (and converted them to actual analysis sentences) and reorganised material. I also deleted redundent repetive sentences. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

In the end, however, we came to concensus, I, for one am sastified with the section. Its all good. -MegamanZero|Talk 16:38, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

You know... we are not debating about the material, we are debating about how its presented. Rearange stuff I done without reverting, I am cool with that, revert? That causes stress. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. I just was a bit flustered when the personality section was left basically untouched for over a month, then suddenly it was changed and run-on sentences were inserted. But, you are correct, we weren't debating, we just came to concensus, and I believe your edits are helpful. -MegamanZero|Talk 16:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

I am not happy with my version. I do not mind it being further improved. So long as it doesn't get reverted I am OK :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 16:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)