User talk:Uniqueuponhim
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Uniqueuponhim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 01:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] License tagging for Image:Cashflowdiagram.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cashflowdiagram.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sawrry, this page is nawt aboat Australia
I did not dispute that and I am getting a bit upset with that reversion, becuase it made comparsons the Britsh and American English, so I decided that it should be consistant, this is becuase UK/US centric notations, rferneces and comparisons are a pet peeve of mine on the English language edition of wikipedia (I'm an Australian wikipedian), are you saying that Australian English is non-sequitur becuase the two "main languages" in the English langauge edition of wikipedian are British and American English? Not very fair on us. Myrtone@Uniqueuponhim.com.au:-(
- The reason that it is UK/US Centric is that the UK and US are virtually the only two contributors to Canadian English (along with France). The reason for this is that we were colonized by the British, and are right next to the Americans. Australia is literally on the opposite side of the globe, and Canadian and Australian dialects have evolved completely separately from one-another, each being influenced in its own way by British English. Uniqueuponhim 14:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I have been debating this with JackLumber about this see here and here. Myrtone@Uniqueuponhim.com.au:-(
[edit] Re:Archmage
Hi there, thanks for contacting me.
I deleted the article because it had been proposed for deletion and the PROD went unchallenged. It had a valid deletion reasoning; that is it was unverified by reliable sources. I can email you the text of the article at the time of the deletion for you to work on off-wiki if you'd like. Just note that recreation of deleted material in the same state as it was when deleted is a candidate for speedy deletion. So if you'd like to spruce it up and then repost it, let me know. Keegantalk 02:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of Leaders in Panzer General II
I'm a bit surprised by the outcome myself; one would think that would've gotten deleted or merged by now. And no, there's nothing problematic about renominating an article, especially when the discussion didn't reach consensus, though the community standards are usually that at least a month or two have passed since the no-consensus result, to give a new discussion a better chance of reaching consensus. In this case it's been over a year, so just fine if you do so. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
