United States federal budget

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Budget of the United States Government is a federal document that the President submits to the U.S. Congress. The President's budget submission outlines funding recommendations for the next fiscal year, which begins on October 1st. Congressional decisions are governed by rules and legislation regarding the federal budget process. House and Senate Budget committees each develop budget resolutions, which provide spending limits for the House and Senate Appropriations Committees' subcommittees, which then approve individual appropriations bills to allocate funding to various federal programs. After Congress approves an appropriations bill, it is sent to the President, who may sign it into law, or may veto it. A vetoed bill is sent back to Congress, which can pass it into law with a two-thirds majority in each chamber. Congress may also combine all or some appropriations bills into an omnibus reconciliation bill. In addition, the President may request and the Congress may pass supplemental appropriations bills or emergency supplemental appropriations bills.

Several government agencies provide budget data and analysis. These include the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the U.S. Treasury Department. These agencies have reported that the federal government is facing a series of important long-term financing challenges. Expenditures related to entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are growing considerably faster than the economy overall, as the population matures.

Contents 1 Budget Basics 1.1 Major receipt and expenditure categories 1.2 Federal Budget Data 1.3 Federal Budget Projections 2 Long-term Budget Issues 2.1 Mandatory Spending and Entitlements 2.2 Social Security 2.2.1 The Social Security "Surplus" 2.2.2 Budgetary Treatment of Social Security 2.3 Medicare and Medicaid 3 Debt relative to gross domestic product (GDP) 4 Current Budget Issues 4.1 Earmarks 4.2 Responses to the 2008 Economic Slowdown 4.3 Budgetary Implications of the 2001 and 2003 Tax Cuts 4.4 Dynamic Scoring, Supply Side Economics and Taxes 4.5 War Funding and the Budget 5 Basic Budget Terms (based on GAO Glossary) 6 See also 7 References 8 External links

[edit] Budget Basics

The U.S. Constitution (Article I, section 9, clause 7) states that "[n]o money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time."

Each year, the President of the United States submits his budget request to Congress for the following fiscal year, as required by the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921. Current law (31 U.S.C. 1105(a)) requires the President to submit a budget no earlier than the first Monday in January, and no later than the first Monday in February. Typically, Presidents submit budgets on the first Monday in February.

The federal budget is calculated largely on a cash basis. That is, revenues and outlays are recognized when transactions are made. Therefore, the full long-term costs of entitlement programs such as Medicare, Social Security, and the federal portion of Medicaid, are not reflected in the federal budget. By contrast, many business and some foreign governments have adopted forms of accrual accounting, which recognizes obligations and revenues when they are incurred. The costs of some federal credit and loan programs, according to provisions of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, are calculated on a net present value basis.

Federal agencies cannot spend money unless funds are authorized and appropriated. Typically, separate Congressional committees have jurisdiction over authorization and appropriations. The House and Senate Appropriations Committees have 12 subcommittees, which are responsible for drafting the 12 regular appropriations bills, which determine amounts of discretionary spending for various federal programs. Appropriations bills must pass Congress and be signed by the President in order to give federal agencies legal authority to spend. In many recent years, regular appropriations bills have been combined into "omnibus" bills.

Congress may also pass "special" or "emergency" appropriations. Spending that is deemed an "emergency" is exempt from certain Congressional budget enforcement rules. Funds disaster relief have sometimes come from supplemental appropriations, such as after Hurricane Katrina. In other cases, funds included in emergency supplemental appropriations bills support activities not obviously related to actual emergencies, such as parts of the 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Special appropriations have been used to fund most of the costs of war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan.

[edit] Major receipt and expenditure categories

The U.S. Federal Government collected $2,568 billion in FY2007, while spending $2,730 billion, generating a total deficit of $162 billion, which was added to the United States public debt. Since 1970, the U.S. Federal Government has run deficits for all but four years (1998-2001)^[1] adding to a total debt of $9.34 trillion as of April 24, 2008. ^[2]

Individual income taxes (45%) and Social Security/Social Insurance taxes (34%) are the primary receipt categories. Social Security, Defense, and Medicare/Medicaid spending are the main spending categories, at roughly 20% of total expenditures each.

[edit] Federal Budget Data

Several government agencies provide budget data. These include the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the U.S. Treasury Department. CBO publishes an economic and budget outlook in January, which is typically updated in August. OMB, which is responsible for organizing the President's budget presented in February, typically issues a budget update in July. GAO and Treasury issue Financial Statements of the U.S. Government, usually in the December following the close of the federal fiscal year, which occurs September 30. The Treasury Dept. also produces a Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances each December for the preceding fiscal year, which provides detailed data on federal financial activities

[edit] Federal Budget Projections

CBO calculates 10-year baseline projections, which are used extensively in the budget process. Baseline projections are intended to reflect spending under current law, and are not intended as predictions of the most likely path of the economy. In recent years, OMB has presented 5-year projections. CBO and GAO issue long-term projections from time to time.

[edit] Long-term Budget Issues

[edit] Mandatory Spending and Entitlements

Social Security and Medicare expenditures are funded by permanent appropriations, and so are considered "mandatory" spending according to the 1997 Budget Enforcement Act. Social Security and Medicare are sometimes called "entitlements," because people meeting relevant eligibility requirements are legally entitled to benefits. Some programs, such as Food Stamps, are appropriated entitlements. Some mandatory spending, such as Congressional salaries, is not part of any entitlement program. Interest on the national debt is not discretionary. Funds to make federal interest payments have been automatically appropriated since 1847. Mandatory spending accounted for 53% of total federal outlays in FY2007, with net interest payments accounting for an additional 8.6%. Discretionary outlays, which rely on annual appropriations for funding, accounted for 38.2% of total federal outlays in FY2007. Over the past four decades, the proportion of federal outlays spent on mandatory programs has increased on average.

[edit] Social Security

Social Security spending will increase sharply over the next decades, largely due to the retirement of the baby boom generation. Most projections, however, estimate that payroll tax revenues will be exceeded by benefit payments starting in 2017 if current policies remain unchanged. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that an increase in payroll taxes equivalent to 1.8% of gross domestic product (GDP) would be necessary to put the Social Security program in fiscal balance for the next 75 years. (CBO, The Long-Term Outlook, Dec. 2007) ^[3]In other words, raising the payroll tax rate to 14.1% immediately (from the current 12.4%) or cutting benefits by 11.4% would address the program's budgetary concerns indefinitely; these amounts increase to around 16% and 22% if no changes are made until 2041.^[4]

[edit] The Social Security "Surplus"

Main article: Social Security debate (United States)

Since recommendations of the Greenspan Commission were adopted in the early 1980s, Social Security payroll taxes have exceeded benefit payments. In FY2007, Social Security received $186.5 billion more in payroll taxes than it paid out in benefits, which reduced the total reported budget deficit. While this "surplus" is deposited into Social Security trust funds that hold special non-negotiable Treasury securities, these funds have been borrowed and spent and are a component of the national debt. Projections of Social Security's solvency are sensitive to assumptions about rates of economic growth and demographic changes.^[5]

[edit] Budgetary Treatment of Social Security

Social Security payroll taxes and benefit payments, along with the net balance of the U.S. Postal Service are considered "off-budget." The total federal deficit is the sum of the on-budget deficit (or surplus) and the off-budget deficit (or surplus). Since FY1960, the federal government has run on-budget deficits except for FY1999 and FY2000, and total federal deficits except in FY1969 and FY1998-FY2001. ^[6]

[edit] Medicare and Medicaid

Main articles: Medicare (United States) and Medicaid

Spending on Medicare and Medicaid is projected to grow dramatically in coming decades. While the same demographic trends that affect Social Security also affect Medicare, rapidly rising medical prices appear a more important cause of projected spending increases. According to CBO projections (The Long-Term Outlook, Alternative Fiscal Scenario), spending on Social Security is projected to reach 6.1% of GDP and Medicare and Medicaid are projected to total 12.5% of GDP in FY2050. By comparison, federal outlays in FY2007 were 20% of GDP and federal revenues were 18.8% of GDP. In other words, spending on those three programs is projected to take up nearly the same proportion of the economy in FY2050 as all federal revenues in FY2007. Unless these long-term fiscal imbalances are addressed by raising taxes or drastic cuts in discretionary programs, the federal government will at some point be unable to pay its obligations.^[7]

[edit] Debt relative to gross domestic product (GDP)

Main article: United States public debt

GDP is a measure of the total size and output of the economy. One measure of the debt burden facing the economy is measuring debt relative to GDP. In 2000, government spending was 18.4% of gross domestic product (GDP), the lowest level since 1966. It had fallen from 23.5% of GDP in 1983.^[8] However, this measure represents the debt held by the public and excludes intra-governmental debt, such as the $2.2 trillion owed to the Social Security Trust Fund.^[9] Including the intra-governmental debt roughly doubles this ratio, which is currently around 66% of GDP.

Further, historical analysis of government spending or debt relative to GDP can potentially be misleading, according to the GAO, CBO, and U.S. Treasury Department. The rate of increase in entitlement spending is now significantly higher than the growth in GDP and expected tax revenues. If significant reforms are not undertaken, benefits under entitlement programs will exceed government income by over $40 trillion over the next 75 years.^[10] In addition to debt as a percentage of GDP, they also monitor the ratio of entitlement spending to government revenues. These non-partisan organizations have used words such as "unsustainable" and "trainwreck" to describe the budget situation 20-40 years hence if substantive reforms are not made.^[11]

[edit] Current Budget Issues

[edit] Earmarks

GAO defines "earmarking" as "designating any portion of a lump-sum amount for particular purposes by means of legislative language." Earmarking can also mean "dedicating collections by law for a specific purpose." ^[12] In some cases, legislative language may direct federal agencies to spend funds for specific projects. In other cases, earmarks refer to directions in appropriation committee reports, which are not law. Various organizations have estimated the total number and amount of earmarks. An estimated 16,000 earmarks containing nearly $48 billion in spending were inserted into larger, often unrelated bills during 2005.^[13] While the number of earmarks has grown in the past decade, the total amount of earmarked funds is small relative to overall federal spending.

[edit] Responses to the 2008 Economic Slowdown

The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 provided an estimated $170 billion in tax rebates to stimulate the economy. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the Act "would increase budget deficits (or reduce future surpluses) by $152 billion in 2008 and by a net amount of $124 billion over the 2008-2018 period."^[14]

[edit] Budgetary Implications of the 2001 and 2003 Tax Cuts

A variety of tax cuts were enacted under President Bush between 2001-2003, through the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA). Most of these tax cuts are scheduled to expire December 31, 2010. Since CBO projections are based on current law, the projections discussed above assume these tax cuts will expire, which may prove politically challenging. CBO has estimated that extending these cuts would cost the U.S. Treasury nearly $1.8 trillion in the following decade, dramatically increasing federal deficits and exacerbating the entitlement-related risks described above.^[15]Senator John McCain has proposed extending the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for all income levels, while Senator Barack Obama has proposed extending them for low- and middle-income taxpayers.^[16]

[edit] Dynamic Scoring, Supply Side Economics and Taxes

The appropriate level and distribution of federal taxes has long been a controversial topic. Since the 1970s, some "supply side" economists have contended that lowering taxes could stimulate economic growth to such a degree that tax revenues could rise, other factors being held constant. However, economic models and econometric analysis have found scant support for the "supply side" theory. Thus, nearly all serious economists believe that cutting federal taxes would, other things equal, increase the federal deficit.

Some economists have called for using "dynamic scoring models," which incorporate feedback effects of tax cuts. CBO has concluded, however, that standard scoring methods incorporate the most important and immediate feedback effects and that attempting to include other feedback effects would lead to speculative results. CBO^[17], and Gregory Mankiw, a Harvard macroeconomist and former head of the Council of Economic Advisors in the George W. Bush administration, have concluded that cuts in federal taxes could stimulate new economic activity that would generate revenues that offset nearly half the cost of the tax cut, if reduced revenues were matched by spending cuts. Offsets when lost revenues were not matched by spending cuts were much lower.^[18] In 2007, the U.S. Treasury issued an analysis of dynamic scoring models that implied that only 7% of lost revenues would be offset by revenue feedback effects. These studies suggest that federal tax cuts would dramatically increase deficits. ^[19][20]

While total U.S. tax receipts grew from 2004 to 2007 by an average of $189.4 billion per year in current dollars^[21], the studies cited above would conclude that such tax receipts would have been significantly higher had the tax cuts not been made.

[edit] War Funding and the Budget

Much of the costs for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have not been funded through regular appropriations bills, but through emergency supplemental appropriations bills. Some budget experts argue that emergency supplemental appropriations bills do not receive the same level of legislative care as regular appropriations bills. In addition, emergency supplemental appropriations are not subject to the same budget enforcement mechanisms imposed on regular appropriations. Funding for the first stages of the Viet Nam war was provided by supplemental appropriations, although President Johnson eventually acceded to Congressional demands to fund that war through the regular appropriations process.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the President's FY2009 budget proposals would provide $188 billion in budget authority for FY2008. ^[22] CBO estimates that appropriations for operations in Afghanistan and Iraq since 2001 through February 2008 total $752 billion. ^[23]

Budget authority is legal authority to obligate the federal government. For many war-related activities there may be a long lag between the time when budget authority is granted and when payments (outlays) are made by the U.S. Treasury. In particular, spending on reconstruction activities in Iraq and Afghanistan has lagged behind available budget authority. In other cases, the military uses contracts that are payable upon completion, which can create long lags between appropriations and outlays.

In principle, the Department of Defense (DoD) separates war funding from base funding. In most cases, however, funds for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan use the same accounts as other DoD accounts. This raises challenges to attempts to achieve a precise separation of expenditures on operations in Iraq and Afghanistan from the base defense operations.

[edit] Basic Budget Terms (based on GAO Glossary)

Appropriations "Budget authority to incur obligations and to make payments from the Treasury for specified purposes."

Budget Authority "Authority provided by federal law to enter into financial obligations that will result in immediate or future outlays involving federal government funds."

Outlay "The issuance of checks, disbursement of cash, or electronic transfer of funds made to liquidate a federal obligation." The term "outlays" is usually synonymous with "expenditure" or "spending."

The amount of budget authority and outlays for a fiscal year usually differ because budget authority from a previous fiscal year in some cases can be used for outlays in the current fiscal year. Some military and some housing programs have multi-year appropriations, in which budget authority is specified for several coming fiscal years.

Total Outlays in Recent Budget Submissions

• United States federal budget, 2009 - $3.10 trillion (submitted 2008 by President Bush)
• United States federal budget, 2008 - $2.90 trillion (submitted 2007 by President Bush)
• United States federal budget, 2007 - $2.77 trillion (submitted 2006 by President Bush)
• United States federal budget, 2006 - $2.7 trillion (submitted 2005 by President Bush)
• United States federal budget, 2005 - $2.4 trillion (submitted 2004 by President Bush)
• United States federal budget, 2004 - $2.3 trillion (submitted 2003 by President Bush)
• United States federal budget, 2003 - $2.2 trillion (submitted 2002 by President Bush)
• United States federal budget, 2002 - $2.0 trillion (submitted 2001 by President Bush)
• United States federal budget, 2001 - $1.9 trillion (submitted 2000 by President Clinton)
• United States federal budget, 2000 - $1.8 trillion (submitted 1999 by President Clinton)
• United States federal budget, 1999 - $1.7 trillion (submitted 1998 by President Clinton)
• United States federal budget, 1998 - $1.7 trillion (submitted 1997 by President Clinton)
• United States federal budget, 1997 - $1.6 trillion (submitted 1996 by President Clinton)
• United States federal budget, 1996 - $1.6 trillion (submitted 1995 by President Clinton)

Budget resolutions and appropriations bills, which reflect spending priorities of Congress, will usually differ from funding levels in in the President's budget. The President, however, retains substantial influence over the budget process through his veto power and through his congressional allies when his party has a majority in Congress. The Democratic Party has had control of Congress since 2006.

The President's budget also contains revenue and spending projections for the current fiscal year, the coming fiscal years, as well as several future fiscal years. In recent years, the President's budget contained projections five years into the future. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issues a "Budget and Economic Outlook" each January and an analysis of the President's budget each March. CBO also issues an updated budget and economic outlook in August.

Actual budget data for prior years is available from the Congressional Budget Office ^[24] and from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) ^[25].

[edit] See also

• United States public debt
• United States budget process
• National debt by U.S. presidential terms - Includes federal spending and GDP

[edit] References

[edit] External links

• Columbia University selective guide for research on the U.S. Federal budget process
• FederalSpending.org "Federal Contracts and Grants"
• The Heritage Foundation's "Federal Revenue and Spending Chart Book"
• Historical budget statistics