Talk:St Kilda, South Australia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
St Kilda, South Australia has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment. | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
 |
St Kilda, South Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Good Article, well done. Auroranorth 14:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References
Some of them are just the same ones over and over again! For example, Taylor, E. is repeated about ten times! Footnotes. Auroranorth 14:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- In the notes section this is true but each work is only the in references once. This appears to be a common academic format else there is no way to note which part of the text is references to which part of a book. As a small suburb there is not a great deal of published material on St Kilda... leading to only a few works used for the majority of the material. Look at the bottom of Report of 1800 (today's front page FA) for a slightly similar usage - Peripitus (Talk) 06:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA Pass
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Epbr123 17:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
