User talk:Species8473
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Species8473, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Edison (talk) 15:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Homeschooling
Yes - it looks as though the objection is that individuals should not be included in this list unless it can be shown that they were specifically homeschooled despite having the alternative of free public education. For many individuals in those time periods, this may not have been an alternative that was available to them. Black Kite 10:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your quick reply, one of my issues is the warning above, can anyone just give them while they are not allowed to be removed? Secondly about the list, how big may such a list be in an article and/or at what point should it be moved to a separate article? Would the latter be allowed? Species8473 (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Feel free to...
...remove anything you like (or dont) from your talk page. (I came here by following a discussion on User: Diligent Terrier's talk page) While its usually best that the person who gave the warning come by and strike through it if they feel that you have explained you case, if you truly believe it to be unwarranted, then you are more then welcome to remove it. If you check out the Talk Page Guidelines you will see that you are free to remove anything you want to, although archiving is best. I believe you have more then explained your side of the issue, and you could always restore the warning with a note at the bottom of it explaining that you had tried to reason with the person who added the template, but in the end, that person was unresponsive. That might be best, as when people some looking through your history later and see you removed a warning, they'll wonder why.
Anyway, I just wanted to let you know. You seem to be a new user with a good heart.
Qb | your 2 cents 14:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hello Queerbubbles, and thanks for your comments! I was hoping Diligent Terrier would remove the warning himself, or give me a reply at least. But I consider it settled now. Anyone wondering why it was removed can go here - Species8473 (talk) 21:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Perfect! See? You're learnin quick! Qb | your 2 cents 01:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
