Talk:Species richness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles. |
|
| Start | rated as start-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
This article would be much more elucidative if it included the biotic (like the spatial heterogeneity theory, competition theory, predation theory and pollinator theory) and abiotic theories (productivity theory, area theory, Rapoport rule) that try to explain species richness. Thank you very much. Hrodrik
[edit] Nonsense
I deleted the words "hello II darwin" as the words looks like nonsense. Shrimp wong 03:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article is awful
This article is impenetrable to a reader who knows little about biology, and personally, it looks like it could use some wikifying. Waelwulf 10:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Back to the drawing board
An excellent example of an article that should have stayed in development before being posted: an abomination! 7 March 2007. ~Timios
Species richness is a different thing altogether than species diversity. Species diversity should not be redirected to species richness. Species richness is a measurement used to calculate diversity, but species evenness must also be taken into account. I suggest that a new article be written on species diversity as a whole. -seafoamshame
