Talk:SOMAN

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The reason why it was tagged for SD was becuase the article does not cite any sources, not even a web site which led me to believe that it was personal article created, no relevance to history. It should of been one the first things you did. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 12:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

There is nothing to suggest that this article should be deleted. It is a simple history of the industrial act Soman, with an extensive discography. There is nothing to suggest promotion or spam. As there are many Wiki pages devoted to other artists of this genre, It is only right that Soman should be included historically on wikipedia. I see no reason why this page should be deleted. The artist in question is an established artist in that genre of music, with an extensive discography and history of playing live. Just because an overzealous editor may have heard of the Artist, is not grounds to remove it. Talksportterry (talk) 11:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

As the reviewing administrator, I think the article does not qualify for speedy deletion. Not having sources is not a reason for speedy--or even a reason for deletion at all. Not being sourceable, on the other hand is a reason for deletion at afd, but still not at speedy. This article really must have some 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases), any language. DGG (talk) 20:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)